In this paper, the authors argue that rethinking about concept of Bhineka Tunggal Ika is necessary to accommodate various differences which occur in Indonesian society today including LBGT communities.
Background
The author argues that three circumstances which are usually have historical implication from a country with a diverse cultures: 1. Present discrimination 2. Historical injustice 3. State establishment of culture. Since its establishment, Indonesia has tried to accommodate multiculturalism through its national motto: Bhineka Tunggal Ika (Unity in Diversity). The phrase has been derived from a book named Sutasoma by Empu Tantular during the era of Majapahit. The motto has been part of government regulation no 66 year 1961 which mentions that the multiculturalism in Indonesia is part of the cultural enrichment. The authors claim that …show more content…
The authors divide diversity as two things for social cohesion: strengthening or weakening factors. The interview suggested that respondent see diversity as “a concept representing a wide similarities and differences which are not necessarily to be listed” (142). Based on the interview, the authors argue that Indonesian society incapable of accepting the diversity around them and respond it with violence. The authors provide an example of how minority group in Indonesia being subjected to violence and discrimination. The respondents suggest that the state should protect and treat every citizen equally. The authors argue that as the Indonesian government has formally recognize diversity in its national motto “Bhineka Tunggal Ika”, the government should “properly managed in order to strengthen
Background
The author argues that three circumstances which are usually have historical implication from a country with a diverse cultures: 1. Present discrimination 2. Historical injustice 3. State establishment of culture. Since its establishment, Indonesia has tried to accommodate multiculturalism through its national motto: Bhineka Tunggal Ika (Unity in Diversity). The phrase has been derived from a book named Sutasoma by Empu Tantular during the era of Majapahit. The motto has been part of government regulation no 66 year 1961 which mentions that the multiculturalism in Indonesia is part of the cultural enrichment. The authors claim that …show more content…
The authors divide diversity as two things for social cohesion: strengthening or weakening factors. The interview suggested that respondent see diversity as “a concept representing a wide similarities and differences which are not necessarily to be listed” (142). Based on the interview, the authors argue that Indonesian society incapable of accepting the diversity around them and respond it with violence. The authors provide an example of how minority group in Indonesia being subjected to violence and discrimination. The respondents suggest that the state should protect and treat every citizen equally. The authors argue that as the Indonesian government has formally recognize diversity in its national motto “Bhineka Tunggal Ika”, the government should “properly managed in order to strengthen