The Importance Of Descartes Approach To Knowledge

Improved Essays
In this essay, we as the students were given the following instructions:
“Discuss in a philosophical-critical manner the significance of Descartes' approach to knowledge (epistemology) as one of the main historical starting points of the Modern world view”
To contradict the various segments of this assignment, the following points will have to be made prominent and then discussed as a whole:
- Discussing Descartes approach to knowledge or better known as epistemology.
- How this approach contributed to the historical starting point of the modern world view.
Descartes approach to knowledge or better known as epistemology
Firstly, René Descartes (1596-1650) is regarded around the world as the father/mentor of modern day philosophy. His immense
…show more content…
To understand everything clearly and distinctly. (Spinoza: 11)

How this approach contributed to the historical starting point of the modern world view.
To summarize the previous points, Descartes made a foundation of knowledge where he utilized a methodological doubt so that a fact or ideology could not be doubted.
Descartes shaped the Modern World-view in the following
…show more content…
He believed that all individual possessed the natural right of reason and argumentation, that each individual has the capacity to discover truth and also undermine the Roman Catholic authoritarianism. Although Descartes was a devoted Catholic, this belief gave support to the Protestant affirmation of the supremacy of individual conscience.
2. The world is understandable through laws of nature and science and can be subjected to the control of man.
3. Descartes believed that the analysis of personal experience is key when approaching philosophy.
4. Descartes’ famous declaration “I think, therefore I am” raises questions about the nature of personality and personal identity. What is the self, the “I” that Descartes establishes as the foundation of knowledge? Maybe a true paradigm and polar opposites of sort?
5. The idea of mind and matter making up the universe is so much part of our human and intellectual heritage that those not trained and teached within philosophy, consider it common sense.
6. Descartes’ quest for certainty determines the direction of much subsequent philosophy. Questions concerning epistemology and methodology take on an unprecedented importance (Introduction to Western Philosophy:

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I will be explaining a meditation in Rene Descartes’ book, Meditations on First Philosophy. First I will summarize how he got to his point in meditation three, and then I will give my opinion on whether or not his claims are successful or unsuccessful. In meditation three Rene Descartes tries convincing the reader that God actually does exist. He starts off by briefly explaining the first two meditations.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sor Juana Analysis

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A Critical Analysis of the Epistemological Projects of René Descartes and Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz In the examination of Descartes and Sor Juana’s epistemological projects, it is evident that the two possesses distinctive pictures of the nature of knowledge. In opposition with one another, Descartes epistemological project culminated in his firmly held belief that he has succeeded in grasping certainty in human knowledge; while Sor Juana, despite multiple efforts to attain absolute knowledge, has conceded that she cannot do so, as the intelligibility of her own intellect is limited and bounded. In this paper, we shall engage in a critical analysis of the epistemological projects of both Descartes and Sor Juana.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Such radical process has a purpose of inquiring and questioning our knowledge by looking at its foundation. If foundation proves to be doubtful, everything else collapses; thus leaving one to own device to decide what knowledge is genuine by using reason. Furthermore, Descartes strives to utilize skepticism as the mean to an end, that is, the doubting all our beliefs for the purpose of acquiring genuine knowledge. However, Descartes himself admits that it might be impossible to know all the truths, but at least the skepticism would help him to eject the false beliefs, replacing them with justified and certain…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes is known for doubting physical objects and people around him. He argues anything that can be doubted should be treated as false. The term knowledge to Descartes means an event or occurrence that is true. Knowledge requires certainty, and without that certainty, it cannot exist. Descartes’ dream hypothesis and evil demon hypothesis show that anything in our world can be fabricated.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, in this essay, I will be looking into the process of two philosopher’s arguments and comparing them. In addition, I will reveal that Locke’s argument against Innateness of the idea of God could be questionable based on his theory of obtaining true knowledge and idea. Rene Descartes asserts the principle of innate idea in the one of his philosophical treatise named “Meditations on First…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Meditations of First Philosophy, Descartes explains philosophical meditations written over six days. The Second Meditation concerns the nature of the human mind. Descartes argues that the human mind is better known than the body. A major claim of his is his most famous quote “I think, therefore I am,” meaning a thinking thing, such as himself, can exist. In this essay, I will prove that Descartes’ argument in the Second Meditation for his existence as a thinking thing is convincing.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael Huemer’s essay, “The Lure of Radical Skepticism,” he expands on the idea that ‘we cannot know anything,’ by outlining four different arguments supporting the claim. (Huemer 47-57) René Descartes holds the opposite opinion, which he discusses in ‘Meditations One and Two.’ While there is validity to both sides of the argument, Huemer’s essay proves to be more reliable after dissecting Descartes’ concepts of existence. Huemer proposes that no one can know anything about the external world, or anything that exists outside of the mind.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay “Discourse on Method,” Descartes argues that the reason our conclusions vary in knowledge is that we do not have a systematic or methodical way of thinking. Therefore, in his essay he tries to provide such a method which could conduct our minds to achieve a complete and certain truth. Though, I wonder, how could one single person be able to come up with a method that could be used by everyone, and function for everyone in the same way. though Descartes was an intelligent philosopher, he could not have been able to concoct a method for everyone’s way of learning. Descartes’ argues that the way we think can vary depending on many reasons.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ideas are defined as whatever is perceived or understood about something; despite this simple denotation, humankind 's capacity to acquire and understand these complex thoughts remains a controversy in philosophical literature. As major role models in the foundation of modern philosophy, Descartes and Locke feud over the definition of these ideas, the acquisition of these concepts, and the content of these thoughts. Descartes identifies with a rationalistic view where knowledge is based on innate ideas and these ideas are acquired through reason, whereas Locke believes in empirical explanations which state that ideas are formulated from sensory experiences with the outside world. In many of Descartes’ works, he emphasizes the importance of…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes is most famous for his promotion of the Cartesian dualism. However there are many alluring subjects that arises during his meditations, and the problem of other minds is one of them. This essay will answer the question how does Descartes arrive at the problem of other minds in the second mediation, and does he offer an adequate solution to it. This essay will be separated into two sections, the first section will comment on how Descartes uses the method of doubt to arrive at the problem of other minds. The second will analyze Descartes ' solution and evaluate its adequacy.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates and Rene Descartes are alike in their most fundamental motives but yet contrasting in results both trying to improve thinking but about two different things. One example would be how they each convey their message formal versus informal, another would be their life style and beliefs of how things should be done. Both Socrates and Descartes have completely different views on getting their desired results, and the level of risk one is willing to take to accomplish certain results. Socrates and Descartes even had vastly different upbringing, and views on which sciences are important and others’ inferior to the rest.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays