Classified Boards

Improved Essays
Classified boards may be effected through provisions in a corporation’s certificate of incorporation or in a corporation’s bylaws. Effecting a classified board in the certificate of incorporation maximizes protection to the board because it is more difficult to remove the classified board provision and declassify the board effected in a charter than in a corporation’s bylaws . If a corporation’s certificate of incorporation contains a provision classifying the board of directors, declassification cannot be done by stockholder vote alone because declassification will require an amendment to the certificate of incorporation. Amendments to a certificate of incorporation require action by both the board of directors and the stockholders. See. …show more content…
See 8 Del. C §109(a) In such a context, a potential acquirer may generally declassify the board by amending the corporation’s bylaws. The moment that by-laws are amended, the board is declassified. At that point, the corporation’s directors may be removed without cause. Unlike a charter that must be filed with the Secretary of State or similar public official to become effective, a bylaw amendment is effective immediately. The declassification amendment can provide that the directors’ terms automatically expire upon declassification or it can phase out the classification over time. If it does not provide for an immediate declassification, then the activist or acquirer would typically remove all the directors or all the directors not elected by the activist or acquirer. Once the directors are removed, the activist or acquirer and its elected directors can either appoint new directors to fill the vacancies or (if possible) adjust the size of the board to their preference. Declassification through a corporation’s bylaw can be made more difficult if the bylaws contain a supermajority stockholder vote provision limiting amendments. As noted above, limitations on action by written consent also may prevent a potential acquirer from amending the bylaws at its chosen time. Another issue raised by declassification in general—but most relevant when the classified-board provisions are in the bylaws (because declassification is more possible)—is the existence of so-called “poison debt.” Poison debt typically refers to borrowing agreements that contains large balloon payments that become due upon the change of control in a board of directors. Therefore, declassifying the board may be made more difficult not only due to provisions in charter and bylaws, but also due to provisions in a corporation’s

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This is because the members’ rights are limited to SEC’s decisions. The act states clearly that SEC is only allowed to remove members only on a purpose. The members of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board had a complaint that their appointment by neither the president nor the head of the SEC violated their rights. The court however, granted the entire…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hrm 531 Week 2 Case Study

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    • The first new thing I learned is that adherence to principles and practices for nonprofit excellence in Michigan are not mandatory. • The second new thing I learned tis a nonprofit with annual total revenue of 500,000 or more must subject its financial reports to an annual audit by the Certified Public and for nonprofits with an annual total of 250,000 they must have an independent review. •…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However in Revance Therapeutics, the top owner is a board member, Ronald W. Eastman, and he also has the most shares owned by board members excluding the CEO. On the latest DEF14A, Eastman was listed to own 14.33% of the shares whereas the board including Eastman own 14.53% of the shares. This could be a problem in the sense that Eastman could try to convince the board to listen to his ideas for the company because he has a bigger interest. When looking at Radius Health’s top owner, Ansbert Gadicke, there is a larger difference between the percent of shares owned by the board and what percent of that is just owned by Gadicke. This would reduce the amount of pressure that he could inflict on the rest of the board, and…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All activities of the company is done with the governance of a person called Director of the company. Director’s duties comes from common law and statue law under Corporation Act 2001.They designed so that director can provide good direction and ensure that they are working for the interest of the company. They do not use their position and information provided to them improperly. Sometime there is the situation of insolvent trading where the director of the company allow their company to incur debt when the company is already debt.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the board does not have an obligation to follow the recommendations of the delegates, they are an important link between the board of directors and the…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, in certain circumstances this corporate privilege is used as a mean of exploiting loopholes in the legal system, leaving the courts with the option of uncovering the corporate veil and imposing liability upon individuals within the corporation. Today, the courts will rather enforce the principle of separate legal entity to a company as in the case of Salomon v Salomon Co Ltd, than apply the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil. However, the courts will not hesitate to pursue a person who willingly takes advantage of the corporate legal system by acting in a fraudulent manner. The intention of the law is to create a fair and just process of incorporation as evident in both judicial decisions and statutory provisions.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The answer depends on the organization's culture, the nature of its mission, the experience and expertise of board members, and the board work that must be accomplished" (BoardSource, p. 49). " Experience has shown that the smaller the board, the easier it can be…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Directors duties which are related to this case are listed as follows:  Duty to act bona fide (in good faith) in the best interests of the company;  Duty to avoid conflicts…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I decided to call in the main office to find out about if the government body is elected or appointed and I was informed that the board of directors are elected. They each have overlapping four year terms. Board of directors are: John L. Varela, Richard Santos, Tony Estremera, Gary Kremen, Barbara Keegan, Nai Hsueh…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fiduciary Duty Essay

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Under this duty, the directors of a company are expected to act in the company’s…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of their main responsibility is to hire and manage the CEO. They only hired a potential CEO but did not follow through with management. They were not able to guide the CEO or control his actions. In this case the Board of Directors may not have compensated the CEO fairly leading to this sort of corruption. The board of directors is also responsible for creating a mission and vision statement and to also adhere to the statements to ensure correct progression.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It encompasses the board of directors and various stakeholders…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Shadow Director Case Study

    • 2248 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In that sense, they would be controlling the affairs of the company by instructing the Board, rather than being appointed as directors. However, in a recent case, State for Trade and Industry v Deverell , Morritt LJ stated that a shadow director may openly operate as one. This was also noted in Re Paycheck where Lord Walker stated, “a shadow director need not be hidden from view.” It could be that a subsidiary’s board are habituated to act upon the parent company’s directions…

    • 2248 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is well known that corporate governance has been defined as “the system by which companies are directed and controlled. Boards of directors are responsible for the governance of their companies, including setting the company’s strategic aims, providing the leadership to put them into effect, supervising the management of the business and reporting to shareholders on their stewardship.” (Financial Reporting Council, UK Corporate Governance Code) Leadership and Board Effectiveness According to the recent annual report, Diageo has been in compliance with The UK Corporate Governance Code which was published by the Financial Reporting Council in September 2014 until 30 June 2016. In this year, Diageo has 13 board members in total and 5 of them are women.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If they were improved we would see situations like Enron, but similar to Enron we have scandals that are common place like Green Mountain coffee, Chesapeake Energy and Groupon. Continuing issues with the Board of Directors calls for additional changes. A few recommendations would be to set term limits for board members (not a bad idea for congress as well), require continuing education, require ethics training. (Forbes, 2012) The control environment is corrupted when owners / cofounders are able to set their own compensation and manager the board of directors. How can you maintain independence if the board is not truly…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays