Why Is Charlemagne A Good Ruler

Improved Essays
Charlemagne as “Emperor and Augustus” Throughout the eighth and ninth centuries, Charlemagne, also known as Charles the Great, greatly expanded the Frankish kingdom into what came to be regarded as the Carolingian Empire. During his reign, Charlemagne successfully led many wars of conquest that had been started by his predecessors and in doing so, regained the wealth that had been lost during the Merovingian Dynasty. In addition, as a devout Christian, Charlemagne was aided by his alliance with the church. In what is known as the Carolingian Renaissance, he also implemented a variety of educational reforms in which he emphasized the seven liberal arts and the collection and correction of ancient texts. Charlemagne’s reign was so impactful …show more content…
While Einhard’s Life of Charlemagne focuses on the nature of Charlemagne’s military affairs and Notker’s Deeds of Charlemagne emphasizes the religious aspects of his life, both represent Charlemagne as a Christian ruler; this shows the important role that Christianity …show more content…
Charlemagne greatly cared about the activities of the church because he was a follower of Christianity himself, as shown by Einhard and Notker, and faith guided him throughout his entire reign as emperor. He was able to spread Christian faith in his kingdom by acting as a protector of the church and by trying to implement an unified practice of Christianity in all parts of his kingdom. This mutually beneficial relationship, in which Christian faith is upheld by the Pope and enforced by Charlemagne, was clearly established in Charlemagne’s coronation by Pope Leo III in 800 (Einhard, Life of Charlemagne 38 and Notker, Deeds of Charlemagne 76). In Notker’s version of the coronation, he states, “Then the holy man…asked the unconquered Charles to come to Rome, and since he was already ruler and emperor of many nations, to receive now the name of Emperor, Caesar, and Augustus by apostolic authority.” (Notker, Deeds of Charlemagne 76). The coronation was a recognition, by the papacy, of the power that Charlemagne already possessed. It was also a representation of the alliance between the church and the state, joined together by Christian

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ap Euro Dbq Essay

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Charlemagne was known as the King of the Franks, as he is known for establishing the Carolingian Empire through a series of conquests. He also believed in a knowledgeable revitalization, even though he was illiterate. 2. The term used by historians for the middle age of Europe was called medieval.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Frankish kingdom grew substantially, along with the church, during the reign of Charlemagne. As new territories were conquered they were they were Christianized; some brutally, such as the Saxons, Muslims were driven beyond the Pyrenees, and the Avars were practically annihilated. The Church looked to Charlemagne for protection, such as from the Lombards. Charlemagne wanted a center of control, however his territories were about the size of the European Union of today. This made is difficult to control.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was interesting to see that how Charlemagne has many different personalities as a leader. I found one short story that was very interesting about Charlemagne. In the story it said that “sons of two nobles, whose duty it was to keep watch at the door of the king’s tent” (88,Stammerer). The nobles did not do a very job with the task that they were given with. The nobles drank so much that they were passed out and left Charlemagne tent unguarded.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles The Great Dbq

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Charlemagne or Charles the Great is most famous ruler of the Middle Ages. He lived ca 742-814 and ruled over the Frankish kingdom which covered Belgium, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and a part of western Germany. He went on to conquer much of western Europe, all under a policy of friendship and cooperation with the Christian Church. He therefore greatly contributed to the expansion of the Christian Church’s power. He also introduced the basis of Feudalism and revived the political and cultural life of Europe after the fall of Western Rome.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Since his armies were always fighting, Charlemagne's gave land to his warriors so they could equip and support themselves. This important gift was able to secure an army of warriors who were deeply loyal and devoted to Charlemagne. By the year 800, the Frankish kingdom included all of modern Holland, Switzerland, Belgium, France, and most of Germany along with large areas of Spain and Italy. Clearly, it seemed that Charlemagne was another Constantine, and possibly even another Augustus Caesar.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlemagne Dbq Analysis

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Charlemagne reformed Europe for the better. He was a real force in the European empire; his people idolized him during his reign. He really innovated the empire. Charlemagne united the Germanic tribes because he forced them to convert to Christian (R) (P), he had a good relationship with foreign dignitaries (P). Finally, he created a one rule set.(P)…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlemagne loved the Christian religion because “He believed the church and state should be allied as forces in the unification of society” (Christian History). Charles received his education from his mother and the monks of Saint Denis. He could speak and read Latin and his native Germanic tongue, but he never learned to write, though he tried to his entire life (Charlemagne today). In his…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Notker and Einhard both wrote accounts about Charlemagne, titled "The Life of Charlemagne. " They both respected him as a Christian and leader of the Franks, however they take an alternate point of view on him. Einhard actually knew Charlemagne, and displays him as a three-dimensional, reasonable individual, with numerous achievements a few failings. Notker considers him to be a legend that he took in of from his older folks, overwhelming and larger than life. Einhard laid out his life story logically,as a kind of historical record of Charles’ life, while Notker put together more of a collection of anecdotes.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Chrlemagne Vs Charlemagne

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Charlemagne’s main concern was education and religion, so he attended one of his many schools as a student, and sent Monks to preserve and spread Christianity to new lands. After Charlemagne’s death, internal and outside…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 16 of The Life of Charlemagne, Einhard goes into extreme detail regarding the friendships that Charlemagne had with the rulers of other Kingdoms. At the end of the chapter, Einhard recounts a story in which “the emperors of Constantinople… were seeking his friendship and alliance. But after he had taken up the name of emperor they suspected that he might want to seize their empire, so he established such a firm treaty with them that no source of any trouble might remain between them” (Einhard 30). This goes to show the honorable way in which Charlemagne ran and expanded his empire. While Charlemagne was most definitely a ruthless leader, he also wanted to show that he was fair to his allies and did not wish to seize their empires.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Einhard composes Life of Charlemagne in 825 AD with the intention of commemorating King Charles’s well rounded devotion to his kingdom and his family, as he went beyond the expected duties of a King. Throughout the course of his life, Einhard had became very fond of the King and felt it his responsibility to preserve his knowledge of the King’s great deeds subsequent to the King’s death. Einhard provides a detailed piece of writing in which he eternalizes the deeds enacted by the King through which the King’s devotion, to both his kingdom and his family, is reflected. First, Einhard provides some detail about rulers who came before King Charles. In doing so, he provides the reader the opportunity to create a comparison in which King Charles…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlemagne’s accomplishments did ultimately outweigh his failures, and as a result, he did deserve the title “Charles the Great”. By 800 Charlemagne had succeeded in greatly extending his power while crushing several enemies. As the sworn protector of the Church, he was in fact the Holy Roman Emperor of Rome, which helped him in fulfilling his goal of converting all of the Franks to Christianity. In addition, Charlemagne attempted to create unity and harmony within his vast empire and to support laws and promote learning that would achieve his goals of the empire. Through his program of cultural revival and changes to the Church, he succeeded in improving the level of civilization in the West.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 771 it is stated that Charlemagne’s brother became ill and passed away, and Charlemagne was “unanimously elected,” (p.27) which says to me that he had found favor among those who had elected him. I believe that he was a good leader at the time of his existence, considering times were much different. He was relentless and pushed tirelessly forward until he was satisfied; such as the battle he fought with King Desiderius in which Charlemagne “exhausted the King, and forced him to surrender at discretion.” (p29) Einhard also states that King Charlemagne “wreaked vengeance” (p.31) against the Saxons in return for their “faithless behavior.” (p.31) Let me explain why I believe this is a good trait, then.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Roman history, there were many leaders treated Christian very bad, they regarded Christian as evil. Because they thought Christian is a threat to their traditional religion and their dominant position. So they started persecute, to frame and even killing Christian. On the basis of Tacitus which is a Rome historian’s record and narrate. Nero deliberately incendiary in Rome city and fabricate it against Christians.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlemagne as a successful ruler and administrator. He treated his subjects very well and knew when people needed to be punished, when to forgive them, and when to reward them for their actions. He traveled throughout his kingdom in order to exert his power and to help with any issues that may have come about. As a ruler he helped to spread Christianity throughout the kingdom. He made the laws for everyday people clearer and enacted new…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays