The Guilty Of 12 Angry Men

Improved Essays
Disagreements tend to happen often, which most likely causes arguments, threats, and other unpleasant actions. When a person does not agree with you, you automatically want to convince them otherwise. In the play ‘’12 angry men’’ all 12 men that are on jury have to come to an agreement of guilty or not guilty for a case of a nineteen year old male who is begin charge of murder. As soon as the play began one of the twelve men had already accused the boy as guilty without any discussion or evidence as the play continued he also makes remarks of the color of his skin and how he isn't a mature young man. I quote juror number ten “‘ You're gonna tell me were supposed to believe his kid, knowing what he is.” As the men kept arguing the case

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The conflict he has is that the other Jurors vote guilty without actually looking at the evidence. Juror 8 believes it should be thoroughly looked at and they should discuss if the boy is guilty or not guilty. Unlike Terry Malloy from ‘On the Waterfront’ that doesn’t face his conflict till the end of the text, Juror 8 decides to cause conflict straight from the start of the text. He does this because he believes the boy is not guilty and also causes conflict because he is upfront and tells the other jurors how it…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article, Minority Matters: 12 Angry Men as a Case Study of a Successful Negotiation, by Eirini Flouri and Yiannis Fitsakis, meticulously analyses multiple strategies and angles taken by juror 8 in the film 12 Angry Men. The article examines what factors contributed to juror 8’s success and the ever changing tactics juror 8 uses to gain supporters for his cause. The negotiation is held to decide the fate of an eighteen year old minority, which allegedly murdered his father. The elements surrounding the negotiation are 12 jurors in a hot conference room, no relationships formed prior to negotiation and none expected or necessarily desired as an outcome. The jurors answer only to themselves and to the law, grounded in the expectation by…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The film “12 angry men” takes place in a courthouse in New York City. There is a trial going on involving a boy that is being charged for murdering his father. His sentence if guilty is the electric chair. The only thing that is deciding his fate, is the jury 's verdict. Guilty or non-guilty?…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Similarly, juror three has prejudice against the defendant as this boy reminds him of his estranged sons perceived ingratitude and he rails against every argument that does not support what he already believes because “that’s how kids are nowadays”, although this is only revealed as the play…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men is a compelling and profound film produced in 1957 directed by Sidney Lumet. This film set in a single room with just twelve cast member, these twelve play a jury called together to judge a murder case involving a young boy who is accused of murdering his father. The jury is charged with coming to a unanimous decision because the punishment is death penalty. Throughout the movie the cast is never referred to by name, rather by their jury numbers offering the viewer an air of mystery and intrigue. The film further shows its artistic talent by offering not only a story to challenge the mind but also the audience’s ethical beliefs.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    NAME: Swathesh Shetty DATE: 12/10/2015 Leadership for Global Citizenship Questionnaire for the movie “12 Angry Men” 1. In one or two sentences, answer the following: a) What is the purpose of the 12 person jury? The purpose of the 12 person jury is to unanimously decide whether the accused is guilty or not guilty of the offence for killing his father based on the data and evidence gathered during the trail in the court.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his play Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose brings us back in time to 1957, to a jury room of a New York Court of Law where one man, Juror #8, confronts the rest of the jury to look at a homicide case without prejudice, and ultimately convinces Juror #2, a very soft-spoken man who at first had little say in the deliberation. Throughout the play, several jurors give convincing arguments that make one think about whether the boy is “guilty” or “not guilty.” Ultimately, one is convinced by ethos, logos, and pathos. We can see ethos, logos, and pathos having an effect on Juror #2 as he begins as a humble man and changes into someone brave at the end. Although all three modes play a part in convincing Juror #2, pathos is the most influential because…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the B A 321 textbook, facilitation is the set of activities carried out before, during, and after meetings to help a group achieve its own outcomes. A facilitator is someone who performs these activities, helping the team by monitoring and improving its internal process. Twelve Angry Men, a movie about an open-and-shut murder trial in which one juror stands alone in his beliefs, made use of facilitation. When the twelve jurors were sent to deliberate a unanimous verdict, the case was not as clear-cut as they once thought. The jurors were made up of twelve men of diverse backgrounds.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuading someone to take your side in an argument is not an easy task to accomplish. There are many things a person must learn in order to become an effective persuader. In the movie twelve angry men, persuasion plays a huge role; as the jury has to decide whether the boy (who is accused of murdering his father) is guilty or innocent. This movie is a great example of ad hominem; which is a logical fallacy in which the argument is countered by attacking the person, their motive, or other things relating to the person who is making the argument. In the movie, every juror is convinced that the boy is guilty of the crime; but there is one juror, juror number eight pleads not guilty.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Set in New York, 12 Angry Men follows twelve jurors as they decide whether or not a young 18-year-old Hispanic boy is guilty for stabbing his father in the chest. In a rather small room, the jurors must reach a unanimous decision, and if there is ‘reasonable doubt,’ the young boy will be freed. In one of the initial scenes, a vote is facilitated where 11 jurors find him guilty, and one juror, juror 8 votes that he is not guilty. He expresses to the group that a discussion needs to be made prior to sending a young boy to the death penalty. There is a lack of evidence which supports why the young 18-year-old boy stabbed his father and in turn leaves some of the minds of the jurors in a place where they are unable to convict within moral certainty.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roles In Twelve Angry Men

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Roles] Each person has a role to play in society, whether it be a small role or a big role. One can look at roles as a drama script for actors. In the Twelve Angry Men movie, each jury men had their own roles to play during the decision-making process, depending on their personality. Starting from the first jury man, the foreman plays an active role in guiding the whole jury group towards making a decision. He leads all the jury men through the discussion with guidance without any biases.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the beginning of the jury deliberation every single man but one believed that this particular case would result in a unanimous guilty verdict. When the men went around the table to announce their verdicts of guilty or not guilty every man raised their hand in a guilty verdict besides one. Juror eight was the only man who walked into that deliberation room with doubts about whether or not the boy did in fact murder his father. Every man that was apart of the jury had their own reasons as to why they believed with every ounce of their being that the verdict was nothing other than guilty. Along with those men and their particular beliefs as to why the boy was guilty also came a window into the men’s lives.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Thesis

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What if you were on trial for first degree murder? In the movie 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose, a young eighteen year old male was on trial for supposedly murdering his own father. The twelve men on the jury were faced with different opinions and facts that questioned their morals and values in life. I feel as if this movie did have “worth” in my life. I think the movie had worth because no one should ever be stereotyped, judged, and accused based on what other people say.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Biases In 12 Angry Men

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Looking Glass of One’s Own Self People base their opinions through opinions they have learned through experience. Some take what parents or elderly people have taught them and apply it to their own life. This is one major way one makes decisions, as well as forming biases. With these developed biases people then come to a conclusion, solution, or verdict with any scenario thrown in their direction.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To what extent is 12 Angry Men a critique of the legal system? The 1957 film, 12 Angry Men, revolves around the discussion in a courtroom regarding the alleged killing of a Hispanic boy’s father. Reginald Rose, through some of his characters, showcases the flaws in the legal system and how prejudice influences the men’s decisions. The film shows the racist, personal biases that sway the decisions of the men, as well as the un-cooperation between the jurors.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays