The Great Conqueror Research Paper

Improved Essays
A Conqueror's Growth Cut Short

A family owning the most in the world started from humble beginnings, Philip II was born in a slowly disintegrated kingdom Macedonia in the north of Greece. Facing many invasions, Philip II taken into captivity by the Thebans from between 386 to 365 BCE. While hostage, he noted their military techniques and brought them back to Macedonia to defeat Illyria. His army supremacy granted him the domination to become emperor. His influence turned deadly when others became offended by his power.

Under his strong prominence Macedonia went through an intensive transformation. “Philip built a powerful military machine that enabled him overcome the traditional clans and make himself the ruler of Macedon.” (Bentley
…show more content…
Nobody saw anyone aid the killer. Though he was definitely acting out of spite, other indicators show he could have possibly been working for another person of high position. Only major emotion or money would make someone capable of betrayal. Biography.com revealed “The Persian king was another possibility, as he would have wanted to avert Philip’s invasion.” Philip II was an important figure as he threatened his power. Another theory, as rumor has it, Philip II was hesitant to pass the empire along to his son Alexander. It could explain why Alexander’s friends finished Pausanias immediately instead of capturing …show more content…
With him as king, there was centralized imperial rule with a robust military. Like said in HistoryOfMacedonia.org , “After all, it was Philip who created the powerful Macedonian army and turned Macedonia into a strong nation in arms.” He brought his country unification and power. Alexander had a lot to live up to - which he did, earning the nickname “Alexander the Great.” Alexander with Philip’s army marched into Asia and conquered as far as India, destroying the Persian empire. Philip’s legacy made Alexander be ambitious, which brought their empire’s expansion at its

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ancient Greek democracy appears to have ended as a result of both internal and external factors. Like the subsequent Roman Empire, the Athenian state appears to have over-reached in its militaristic ambitions, ultimately weakening it; while the relative strength of other empires enabled them to take Greece over. The imposition of rule by foreign empires finally ended Greek democracy. From internally, Athens moved from being a defender of its own nation to an aggressor though it would have no doubt maintained that this was in its national security interests. One of the consequences of this aggression and ambition was the loss of the alliances that had helped repel the Persians and in some cases their subjugation (Brand, n.d., p.28).…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Soon after his father's death, alexander took his fathers thrown and was in power and control. He used this opportunity to successfully conquer the Persian empire. he had a very powerful army, and he was known to be a genius for the military force. Alexander also succeeded to colonize the city of tyre.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King Philip conquered Greek city-states and planned to fight the strongest empire, the Persian Empire. At age 20 his father King Philip was tragically assassinated, which left him to take the rule and finish what his father started. The Persian Empire was the strongest in the world, which gave Alexander the motivation to fight. He pushed through Persian controlled land, across Asia…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the background essay, it states “Alexander inherited his father's kingdom and set out with the army to conquer Persia” Consequently, Alexander took his leadership role and took action immediately to ensure success for both him and his kingdom. Leadership is undoubtedly one of the most important components in being a great leader, which is why Alexander is a great…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The conquests and empire-building of Alexander the Great changed the history and culture of Europe, with his battle tactics being used by many future military leaders, as well as Hellenistic influence being spread throughout…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great lived for just 33 years, but he left a mark on history that has survived for over two millenia. Born in 356 BCE in Macedonia, Alexander spent his childhood envious of his father's conquests. He watched his father, Philip of Macedonia, head off to great battles and Alexander read of Greek heroes who were celebrated for their bravery. All the while, he wished that he too could become a hero in history.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Alexander of Macedon: A Great Leader Being the first person to conquer the Egyptian, Greek, and Persian empires in just over a decade was no walk in the park, and neither was integrating a culture into all of those empires nor attempting to unite them all. Alexander of Macedon was this man: he conquered the greatest empires, spread the Greek influence, and lead in a unique way with his inspiring character that he is famous for. Although he was not the ideal leader such as Plato’s idea of a philosopher-king, he was an ethical man who wanted his people content. His well-known title, “Alexander the Great,” was very appropriate for him: his fine character and social goals, his unique political leadership and strategic conquering, and his economic…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Once Alexander III of Macedonia’s father died, he inherited his throne and took over his empire at the age of twenty. Following in his father’s footsteps, he controlled a vast area of land, from Greece to Egypt extending to the Hindu Kush Mountains. Alexander did conquer over 3,000 miles of land, which is absurd, but his ruthless and sadistic manner doesn’t deserve the honoring title of “great”. Alexander was so power hungry, that his actions became deadly. He would pilfer every town and eradicate any obstacle in his quest for victory.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In spite of the fact that he was pulling together his boundless realm, the Macedonians felt they were losing their pioneer. He began self-love to unite his differed regions with a typical religion, yet he brought it too far with prokynesis. (Prokynesis is the demonstration of bowing before somebody) .Alexander had the general population of his realm do as such. After this, Alexander still held quite a bit of his energy, yet it would soon be detracted from…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander the Great is considered the Greatest, because he has never been defeated in a battle. Alexander is still considered one of the most successful military leaders in history. Even though Alexander the Great is a legend, he still has ton of accomplishments and the impact after his death. When Alexanders father was assassinated during the invasion on the Persian empire that’s when he became king Alexander. Further more into the next paragraph we will be talking about how Alexander made all of those accomplishments, There are so many things that Alexander the Great has accomplished and one of them is when Alexander was the king of Macedonia and how he conquered an empire that was from Balkans to modern–Pakistan.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “It seemed to the Macedonians a very critical time; and some would have persuaded Alexander to give up all thought of retaining the Greecians in subjection by force of arms, and rather to apply himself to win back the gentle means the allegiance of the tribes who were designing revolt, and try the effect of indulgence in arresting the first motions towards a revolution.” (Plutarch, 12) Plutarch explains that the citizens of Macedonia did not want to be ruled by Alexander, but he rejected the ideas previously stated and found this “very critical time” was a time to prove himself and win over the Macedonians, and he did so when he battled in the city of Thebes, and he showed no mercy when he pillaged it. Plutarch wanted these battles to show the power of Alexander, as he often compares him to Julius Caesar for being a great leader, and a calm collected man even though Alexander was not that. Plutarch was biased with Alexander, for he praised him for the choices he had made because he made judgements on Alexander and not the situation. I believe that with his bias Plutarch has a persuasive document with Alexander the Great, which makes me feel as if this writing is credible.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great was a significant historical figure who was as great a commander as his name suggests. Whether it be his two million square miles of conquered land, or his contribution to science through his expeditions, he certainly was one of the most important people of his time. In fact, Alexander the Great had such a lasting effect, the era after him was named “The Hellenistic Period”, from Hellas, which is the word for Greece. Alexander the Great was a fearsome figure of the ancient times, who had conquered Egypt, Central Asia, and had even beat Persia’s army. Historical evidence suggests that Darius III, the then king of Persia, had set the battlefield to his favor.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The life and history of Alexander the Great, and the empire that he formed, has been studied by people ever since his death. Alexander’s empire ruled over a large portion of land from Greece in the west to India, in the east. His actions brought an end to the long standing conflict that the Persians and Greeks had with each other, established multiple cities that bore his name across the land that he conquered, had a major influence on future rulers, and had remnants that lasted until the time of the Roman Empire. Alexander not only had a prominent place in history, but he also contributed to advancements in military tactics of the ancient world. The life of Alexander had a far reaching effect on world history that lasted for centuries after his death, and the study of his life can help a person understand various facets of history that were inspired or influenced by his actions.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great was very important in Western Civilization, he conquered more land than any other king in this time. His reign as the King of Macedonia was important because he was able to lay down the foundations for the Hellenistic era. Alexander was the son of Phillip of Macedonia and king of Macedonia. His father, who had died wanted revenge on Persia and Alexander continued with his father’s plan to seek revenge against the Persians. Alexander on the other hand wanted total conquest, he had a dream of one world.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This most likely stems from him always wanting to outdo his father, Philip II, as it was originally Philip’s plan to invade Persia, not Alexander’s. By invading India, Alexander was finally stepping out of his father’s shadow but at the expense of the opinion of his own men as opposition in the army…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays