The Freeport Doctrine Dbq

Decent Essays
The Freeport Doctrine was enacted by Stephen Douglas and stated that essentially slavery could be ended by the territories themselves. The uninformed refusal of the voters to enact laws to protect slave “property”. Essentially the territories not pushing for laws protecting their “property” means that slavery could ultimately be ended. If the people of a territory supported slavery, legislation should ultimately be provided for its continuation. Stephen Douglas this all during the Lincoln-Douglass debates, eventually it led to his loss in the 1860 presidential election. This was a retort to a question that Lincoln asked Douglas, and the South would recognize that Douglas did not truly support their ideals. Douglas was a Senator from Illinois,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Before the Missouri Compromise there was a lot of tension between the North and South because of slavery. Though it became even more heated after the Missouri’s 1819 request for admission into the Union as a slave state, which threatened the balance between slave and free states. The reason why the balance was disrupted was because before the request from Missouri there were an even amount of slave and free states. As well as, it would set a precedent for congressional consensus to the increase of slavery. So, to help ease the tension between the states Congress created a two-part compromise, which is known as the Missouri Compromise.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Research Paper

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Their heated debates were primarily focusing on the issue of slavery and states’ rights. The format of the debate was the first speaker spoke for sixty minutes; the other speaker spoke for ninety minutes, and then the first speaker returned for a thirty-minute “rejoinder.” Although the senators were elected by the congress in the 19th century, Douglas and Lincoln took their debates to the public was mainly for their party’s broader election interests of aiming to become the majority in the Illinois legislature. Similar to the political rhetoric in today’s elections, Douglas tried to label Lincoln as the extreme Abolitionists to instill fear in the local suffrage; partisan politicians’ mud slinging, crushing opponents’ moral conscience or patriotism were common practices even before the two-parties…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In pursuing a very different direction of the passage “a house divided against itself cannot stand” and the Fredrick Douglas excerpt[i], the opposing argument remains, centralization takes away individual freedom. Justin Buckley Dyer in his work, Revisiting Dred Scott: Prudence, Providence, And the Limits of Constitutional Statesmanship stated the Court logic of the Scott decision[ii]. Dyer rightly surmised, “The principle announced by the Court, in other words, tended toward the resolution of the slavery question through the nationalization of slavery via the judiciary. ”[1] Nevertheless, Douglas still endorsed a nationalization movement, "When I join any movement such as I suppose contemplated, I must have a country or the hope of a country…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Constitution Dbq

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Constitution is the one document that essentially holds the nation together. It defines what is and is not permissible under the law of the land — it IS the law of the land. Being that slavery was a major problem during the nineteenth century (and late eighteenth century), it was only natural that historians turn towards the dogma of the United States. Although historians had different interpretations, there is only one that seemed logical and had substance. The forefathers of America whom wrote the constitution intended for it to offer protection for the institution of slavery (in other words, it was pro-slavery) because they, themselves, were slaveowners and made no conscious effort to eradicate slavery even though they had to opportunity…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Radical Abolitions

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The United States in the mid-19th century was as divided as ever. Conflict between anti- slavery North and pro-slavery South arose due to new states forming and whether slavery would be implemented into these new states. There was also division inside these two groups, more specifically, the Anti Slavery North. The Abolitionists were divided into two groups, the Radical Abolitionists, headlined by Frederick Douglas and William Lloyd Garrison, and the Anti-Slavery Republicans, headlined by Abraham Lincoln. The book, The Radical and the Republican, by James Oakes focuses on the impact that Frederick Douglas and Abraham Lincoln had on each other through their different views which led to the abolition of slavery.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Emancipation Dbq

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The next paragraph narrates and relates the Proclamation of Emancipation and how President Lincoln made the decision to fight for freedom and confronted enemies regardless of the fear of losing the war. The following is related to my way of thinking because they decided to fight for their freedom without thinking about defeat, considering defeat was not in their language they only had in mind to succeed. They were positive and they fought. An example is on page 1 "Slaves in rebel states".…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 stated the California would enter as a free state, but Utah and New Mexico would also enter and determine if they were a free or slave state by popular sovereignty of the residents; both were declared as free states (doc 5). The Fugitive Slave Act also came into existence because of the Compromise of 1850; something in favor of the south, if it would have been enforced. The North ignored the Fugitive Slave Act and freed escaped slaves. As if the Southern and Northern states couldn't disagree more, the Dred Scott decision drew them even more apart and pushed the south a little closer to secession (doc 7). In 1854, Stephen Douglas introduces the Kansas-Nebraska Act which then creates Kansas and Nebraska territories and they again are decided if they are slave or free territories by popular sovereignty (doc 6).…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Despite the opposition of fellow Southerners” ( Politics or Principal… 405). Johnson was being challenged by other southerners and being criticized for what he was…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Douglas’s position favoring popular sovereignty flew in the face of Lincoln’s designs as so, at a debate In Freeport Illinois Lincoln asked Douglas to explain how the people of territory could exclude slavery in light of the Dred Scott ruling. Douglas’s reply became known as the Freeport Doctrine. He said, Slavery needed the protection of “local police regulations.” In any territory, citizens opposed to slavery could elect representatives who would “by unfriendly legislation” prevent the introduction of slavery. This would become Douglas’s solution as he approached the 1860 election.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lincoln-Douglas debates, also known as the Great Debates of 1858, were a series of seven debates between two politicians running for the senate seat of the state of Illinois. The politicians were the republican nominee, Abraham Lincoln, and the democratic nominee, incumbent Stephen Douglas. The debates covered a series of topics, the most pertinent being the issue of slavery and its expansion into the newer western territories. The idea of the debates came forth after both Lincoln and Douglass had given speeches opposing one another in two of Illinois’ congressional districts. Lincoln and Douglas agreed to the series of seven debates in the remaining congressional districts: Ottawa, Freeport, Jonesboro, Charleston, Galesburg, Quincy, and…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the late 18th century, the Constitution of the United States was ratified and the unification of the union along with it. Although the Constitution was created to produce order and unity, the nation was split into two by the mid-19th century. After a vast amount of territories being brought into the union due to the nation 's’ Manifest Destiny, the issue of slavery became the center of politics. The cause of such political and social chaos was the fact that the Constitution had not specifically addressed the issue of slavery and what was to be done about it. It’s consequences were that the nation had felt it’s repercussions years later.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With respect to the federal Constitution, the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. To what extent was this characterization of the two parties accurate during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison? As war wages on in Europe, economic and political influence is spreading to America. As the President’s, Jefferson and Madison are challenged by upholding their country’s honor and putting their beliefs into action.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the antebellum period before the Civil War, the southern states of the US depended heavily on slave labor to facilitate economic development. Protecting slavery was essential to them, and they took every measure possible to do so. Trying to prevent any possible path to abolition, they fought to maintain states’ rights as they believed the expansion of the federal government would undermine their ability to protect their “peculiar institution.” However, as they fought the centralization of Washington which they saw as increasingly despotic, they didn’t see how their enslavement of millions of African-Americans was so contradictory to their states’ rights claims. Frederick Douglass, a former slave-turned-abolitionist, however, did.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Brown Dbq Essay

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This claim drew a political wedge among the Democratic and the developed Republican Party that Lincoln was a part of. The abolitionist perspective of the North attributed to their growing hostility towards the southerner’s ideals about slavery as shown in Lincoln’s denouncement of southern ideals. Frederick Douglass, a free African-American author, reminisced about his relationship with John Brown and how he respected him very much, so much to claim that it is an “honor to ourselves in doing and honor to him, for it implies the possession of qualities akin to his” (F). Frederick’s heightened respect for Brown stems from Brown’s purpose of his cause. John Brown sought to free slaves in his attack on Harpers Ferry.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1829, American settlers began to reside in Mexico’s territories in the southwest, disregarding their customs and laws. American colonists in Texas protested Mexican rule, sparking the Texas Revolution in 1835. Soon after, Mexican dictator Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna attacked Alamo and won, but the Treaty of Velasco gave Texas independence and created the border between Texas and Mexico (Berkin 314). Unfortunately, Mexicans wanted renegotiation of the treaty, threatening war. On April 22, 1846, Mexico announced that its territory had been invaded and declared war.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays