Tort Essay

Improved Essays
Defination
The law of tort is defined as a body of rights, obligations and remedies that is applied by courts in civil proceedings to provide relief for individuals or victims (claimant or plaintiff) who have suffered harm from the wrongful acts of others (defendant).
Parties which can acquire an action the law of tort
Any individual can sue utilizing the law of tort. There is the potential for kids, kids who are conceived with handicaps because of mischief perpetrated preceding conception and even spouse and wife to sue one another. These are a few samples of the way the law has been produced to incorporate certain people.
Parties who an activity can be brought against
The following are examples of parties who can have an action brought
…show more content…
There are four elements to a tort, each of which needs to be present for a remedy to be provided. They are as follows:
Duty of Care-For a tort to occur the defendant for an action must owe a legal duty to the victim of the tort.
Breach of Duty-For a tort to occur the defendant for an action must have breached the duty that was legally imposed on him.
Causation-The breach of the legally imposed duty must have caused damage or injury, whether directly or indirectly to the victim
Damage or Injury -There must be damage or injury. This does not necessarily have to be physical damage or injury it could be monetary or often emotional distress or embarrassment are included PERSONAL RIGHTS IN TORT LAW

Privacy is the privilege to be not to mention or to be free from abuse or misuse of one's identity. The right to personal right is the privilege to be free from baseless exposure, to carry on with an existence of detachment, and to live without outlandish impedance by general society in matters with which people in general is not so much

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays
    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tort/Crimes Assignment Bethany Gardner 1. Martellio Bennetto a. Claims Against: i. Vs. Adam Pacman Bones 1. Rule: Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress a. Rule Definition: An intentional infliction tort of emotional distress is when the defendant performs an intentional act that results in emotional distress and b. Analysis: The defendant intentionally broke the electronic lift, out of anger, which caused the plaintiff to experience emotional distress.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To be successful in either a malpractice or negligence cause of action, the plaintiff must prove the following to establish liability on the defendant: 1. Duty owed to the patient. 2. Breach of the duty owed to the patient. 3.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this trial, the question the court is being asked to answer is whether Alex Cooper was responsible for his own injuries. Throughout this trial, the law applied was negligence. Negligence is broken down into four parts: duty, breach, causation, and damages. Due to the nature of this trial as a civil suit, the plaintiff had the burden of proof, meaning the burden to prove by the greater weight of the credible evidence.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Eeoc Case Study

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Protected Activity- Filing a formal complaint of discrimination or harassment with EEOC is a protected activity. Rebuttable Presumption: facts, that are accepted by a court until it is proved to the untrue. Relief Sought- Plaintiff must identify the damages or other relief sought in their complaint or pleading.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The injuries sustained in the Niles v City of San Rafael were foreseeable. The injuries resulted from the commission and the omission of act from the defendants. There was negligence in the city’s supervision of the school playground and medical malpractice at Mt. Zion Hospital. The medical negligence was nonfeasance meaning there was a failure to act when there is a duty to act as a reasonability to safeguard a person rights. The Plaintiff was an innocent party whom rights were violated by the defendants.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the laws about comparative negligence, you are able to seek damages from the other party in a car accident. Even if you were partially at fault, you are entitled to recover the percent of the damages that was not your fault. If you were 40 percent at fault for a $100,000 accident, you would be able to recover 60 percent, or $60,000, of the total amount. The “No-Fault” Laws in Florida…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Question 1 Area of the Tort law: Negligence Liability Material Facts: Benji v Parramatta Storms Rugby League Club, Jack and Bronco (Personal Injury- Head)/ Negligence act. Benji (Plaintiff), a first grade league player of Western Tigers Rugby League Football Club was severely injured following a spear tackle by Parramatta Storms Rugby League Club’s (first defendant) players Jack and Bronco (second and third defendants). Benji was therefore forced into career retirement at his peak due to negligent acts of the defendant. Subsequently, National Rugby League charged the second and third defendant with having made a dangerous throw, to which they pleaded guilty. Issues: The most pertinent issue at hand is the fact that whether the defendants…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While I always knew there was a difference in the types of legal cases such as criminal and civil, I was not aware of Tort law. According to Lau & Johnson (2011). “A tort can be broadly defined as a civil wrong, other than breach of contract” Simply stated, a Tort is some type of civil wrong that causes harm or loss. These law suits are brought for reasons such as personal injury, consumer protection or defamation.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are four elements of the intentional tort of battery. (1) There must be a voluntary, affirmative…

    • 1778 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Duty

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “It is primarily the blameworthiness of parental non-action, however, that justifies recognition of a tort duty to protect minor children” (Johnson & Hargrove, p. 319). “For example, in Laser v. Wilson,28 the high court of Maryland found that the parents of a two year-old child, and not their hosts, who had invited the parents and their child to a family gathering, had the duty to protect the child from the obvious danger of an open stairwell. 29 In a Texas case, a trial court entered a tort verdict against a mother who had failed to protect her daughters from abuse by their father.30 In another passive-parent case, in Minnesota, "the mother of a 21-year-old woman who was molested by her father as a child [was] found jointly liable for part of a $2.4 million jury award against him" (Johnson & Hargrove, p.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this case negligence by a building subcontractor led to the installation of a defective floor in a factory. The floor had to be repaired at substantial cost the owner of the factory. Free variety of reasons not all of which are clear, the armatures not sue the main contractor in contract as you might have been expected to do, but instead chose to pursue the subcontractor in tort. Because of the explicit nature of the expansion in this case objections to its reasoning set in almost immediately, criticisms were concerned with the fear of indeterminate liability and prospect of releasing a large number of unmerited and potentially oppressive claims thus opening the judicial floodgates secondly there was concern among the judiciary that the traditional relationship between court tort and contract was being disrupted with adverse consequences that the legal and commercial…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Negligence Tort Case Study

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Negligence occurs when a particular person fails to perform a duty that they are entitled to perform. According to laws.com, there are four things that must occur in or-der for a tort to be a negligence tort, “a person must owe a duty or service to the victim in question; the individual who owes the duty must violate the promise or obligation; an injury then must arise because of that specific violation; and the injury causes must have been reasonably foreseeable as a result of the person’s negligent actions. (laws.com)” The decision in the case, Tarasoff vs. Regents of University of California, demonstrates these four qualifying factors, therefore making it a negligence tort case.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Injuria And Tort-Feaser

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In tort law, this person or the entity (it can be a sovereign state or its agents like police/army or municipal authorities) is called the tort-feaser. In this paper, we shall try…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Every person owes of a duty of care to his neighbor, breaching this duty leads to a tort or tortious act. These tortious acts can be in the form…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays