A white man and a black man could be within the same bracket of wealth but because of complexion the black man will always be inferior to the white man, and that is interclass inequality. There are various other classes that show and explain a capitals rise, but these are the main concepts, they feed on the people below them. The authors reason, Richard Peet, for this article is to synthesizing two concepts: the Marxist principle that inequality and poverty are inevitably produced by capitalist societies, and the social-geographic idea that inequality may be passed on from one generation to the next via the environment of opportunities and services into which each individual is implanted at birth. His goal is to show that Inequality and poverty cannot be eradicated without fundamental changes in the mode of production of industrial reserve army’s within cities. Peets reason for this article shows he agrees with marxist theory of inequality and poverty but felt that there was something missing to it, thats why he introduced the social geographic idea or theory to show that this correlates to Marx theory as well. To me, this is a very interesting article where I completely agree with Marx theory, but I 'm 75/25 on Peets social-geographical theory. I do agree with Peets arguments for the majority of the matter. Throughout the article he states various …show more content…
I feel as though racial equality was beginning to get to a point where everyone would be completely equal, but it seems that are other races that were against it and were offended so retaliation and abusement of power began to surge. we are entering an era of racial equality where everyone should consider themselves equal, but we are fighting against that. to me it seems that the new generation(us) are far more accepting of racial equality than the older generation (parents and grandparents), and that is something that not just because of our surrounding environment, but some kind of social