The Federal Arbitration Clauses: A Case Study

Improved Essays
Reasonover is not bound to the clause. The Federal Arbitration Act regulates arbitration of disputes which are subject to arbitration clauses. Even though the FAA has put in place a policy favoring arbitration, it is first necessary to determine whether the parties actually entered into an agreement to arbitrate disputes.

Reasonover subscribed to a seven day trial period with Clearwire. The modem was shipped to her via FedEx, however when the package was attempted to be delivered she was not home so FedEx held the shipment for her. Because of this Reasonover was not able to pick up the modem before the free trial concluded. Once Reasonover was able to retrieve the modem she attempted to install it but was only able to get “one green

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The actuality of the case of State v. Stewart consist of a variety of mental, physical and emotional abuse in which Peggy Stewart had been “pushed” in her own mind to kill her husband to escape from his toxic and cruel behavior. As a result, the facts of the case are a wide variety that contributed to Peggy’s “imminent danger” state of mind when deciding whether her actions were truly self-defense. These include the abuse at hand, physiological trauma that Peggy experienced, and professional opinions about Peggy’s actions. An important factor of the case is Peggy Stewart’s significant abuse by her husband, Mike. Additionally, Mike’s abuse was not only to Peggy; but also to her daughter, Carla.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the case of Casimaty v FCT 97 ATC 5135, the taxpayer was doing fencing and farming business, which his father inherited an amount of 998 acres land that was known as “Acton View” (Australian Tax Casebook p.162). He then purchased another 40 acres of land, which he built a homestead. As time goes by, he suffered some sort of difficulties as there were drought, severe financial debts, and as well as poor health condition. As he had no alternatives, so he decided to sell-off portions of the land from time to time as to reduce the burden of his debt. There was a series of eight subdivisions and a large portion of property was sold.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case name: Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987) Facts: Ardith McPherson was appointed a deputy in the Constable’s office of Harris County, Texas, on January 12, 1981. Her duties were only clerical. On March 30, 1981, McPherson discussed with her boyfriend, and fellow employee, a report about an attempt to assassinate the President of the United States. She made the remark “If they go for him again, I hope they get him”. Her remark was reported to Constable Rankin, who fired McPherson, even though she told him she did not mean anything by it.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gideon v. Wainwright,372 U.S. 335 (1963) Parties: Plaintiff: State of Florida (the prosecutor) Defendant: Gideon Petitioner to the Florida Supreme Court: Gideon (on a writ of habeas corpus) Respondent to the Florida Supreme Court: State of Florida Petitioner to the United States Supreme Court: Gideon (on a writ of certiorari) Respondent to the United States Supreme Court: State of Florida History: Gideon was charged with a misdemeanor (B & E).…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument In the case of Swidler and Berlin v. United States, the government issued a subpoena to obtain the handwritten notes of attorney Hamilton that had been written during a meeting with his client, Vincent Foster. A few days later the client, Foster, committed suicide. The argument of the United States government was that because the client was deceased they could legally obtain the notes disregarding the attorney – client privilege.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Judge Casas’ Ruling In APUSA Inc. v The State of California the court rules in favor of APUSA,Inc. The court finds the State of California violated the establishment clause using the Lemon Test and Agostoni test. In both instances the CCQEA explicitly violates the establishment clause by way of money being directly distributed from the government to the religious institutions, joined with a lack of specificity of how the money is to be used. The State of California would be served in adding guidelines to the law clearly dictating that grant money is not to be used for secular purpose.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    State V. Evans Case Study

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the case of State v. Evans, 671 N.W.2d 720, (2003). , we see the distress of the victim that suffered from both harassment and stalking from her predator for a period that span more than three years (Brody and Acker, 2010). The harassment aspect that Hubert Evans summited the victim, Rebecca Arnold, to started out at a very slow rate with it become more intense and leading to stalking over years leading to the arrest of Mr. Evans and criminal conviction for harassment and stalking (Brody and Acker, 2010). The criminal charges were heard by a judge and jury where Mr. Evans gained a criminal conviction for the charges that he faced in the trial. The criminal conviction of Mr. Evans lead to his appeal to the State of Iowa Appeals court to evaluate the case as it relates to the state statute for harassment and stalking (Brody and Acker, 2010).…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many in the industry will agree when we say that the contracts in the construction industry have become more and more complex. Many owners will attempt to put extensive contracts in place that leave all responsibility on the contractor for the job. In response, contractors provide pages and pages of classifications, clarifications, exceptcions and alterations to terms laid out in the original contract. Over the last two decades, it has become difficult for owners and contractors. They must rely more than ever on legal maneuvering in order to minimize risks that come with the situation.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    GIDEON v. WAINWRIGHT CITATION: 372 U.S. 335 (1963) FACTS: In the state court of Florida, Gideon was accused of breaking and entering. Gideon is so poor that he has no money to hire a lawyer. So he asked the justice to appoint a lawyer for him.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The supreme court justices Samuel Alito answered to this case that Mr. Salina didn't have the right to remain silent. Mr. Salina was free to leave, which didn't insert his Miranda rights and he had therefore no right to remain silent. Justices Samuel Alito stated that Mr. Salina´s should have affirmatively invoked his rights, because without Mr. Salina´s having a lawyer or being told the Miranda rights he should have been more affirmative about his invoking. (http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/06/salinas_v_texas_right_to_remain_silent_supreme_court_right_to_remain_silent.html) Salinas v. Texas is demonstrating the Miranda rules in a way where if the rules doesn´t apply the questioned from the beginning the Miranda rights doesn't apply either.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 1980 court case, Armstrong V. Kline, drew from parents of children with exceptionalities becoming upset with the education system’s 180-day school year rule1. Beginning in January of 1980, they decided that enough was enough and they needed to do something before summer vacation came so, their child/children would not lose everything they learned during the school year1. The parents took on the court case, filing three class action lawsuits, all of which were against Caryl Kline, the secretary of education and chief official of the Department of Education1. The result of this particular case relieved me but, the fact it had to become a court case, I found to be absolutely ridiculous. Also, the terminology they used while describing the…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on the aforementioned statements in this week’s assignment, I agree with the second statement regarding plea bargaining being right and proper. Like any tool utilized to find a solution, or to compromise, plea bargaining can be abused. A majority of the time I feel that plea bargaining is a great tool that allows for a reduction in the number of trails that judges oversee (Plea Bargaining, 2009). Moreover, I believe that our justice system is flooded and congested with pending trials and lacks the resources needed to pursue each trial with an equal amount of attention (Plea Bargain, 2009).…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Joint Commission Case

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3. What is the impact of the policy to this institution (economic, implementation, services, etc.)? The objective of the Joint Commission standard is to focus on quality improvement, not blame. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations has recently instituted new standards to encourage facilities to focus on infection control. Factoring in, all hospitals are required by the Joint Commission to demonstrate compliance with hand washing practices.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This case study, State v. Selalla (2008), involves Kevin Ballesillo Selalla (Selalla) who was charged in South Dakota on 27 July 2005 for drug possession, drug dealing intent and assuming fake identities intended to mislead law enforcement. Prior to the trial, Selalla claimed having limited knowledge of English and in response, the trial court hired a Spanish/English interpreter to assist Selalla. However, the Public Defender’s office took liberty in hiring another interpreter to facilitate communication between the defense counsel and Selalla. The trial court then dismissed the interpreter it had hired citing that retaining more than one publicly-funded interpreter is unwarranted. This analysis seeks to examine the role and administration of courtroom interpreters.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unions have two distinct viewpoints: the business and the union viewpoint (Shmoop Editorial Team, 2008). These two viewpoints help to forge the relationships within individual corporations that can impact the collective bargaining process. However, when it comes to unions differences can exist within public and private sector unions. This is why having a good understanding of the negotiating process and some of the various organizational leadership competencies can be an important aspect of unions (Shmoop Editorial Team, 2008).…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays