The Romanov Dynasty

Superior Essays
The cause of the fall of the Romanov Dynasty has been said to have many different causes by different people like Rasputin, Tsar Nicholas II and even fate has been blamed. The aim of this investigation is to find out to what extent Tsarina Alexandra can be held responsible for the fall of the Romanov dynasty. By doing this we need to dive into her life and find out the way she acted, lived and what she did and the reasons she did them. This investigation is not to say that the fall of the Romanov Dynasty was completely her fault but rather to find out what role she played in it. Alexandra has been documented to be a woman that was harsh and cold, other sources say that she was shy. The people did not like the Tsarina from the beginning and …show more content…
Source G suggests that Rasputin knew that the Tsarina was broken down and weak and so he took advantage of that so that he could fall into power. Rasputin’s power did not only envelop the Tsarina but also the Tsar. This was actually a major cause of the fall of the Romanov Dynasty as Rasputin’s influence led to major havoc in the country due to bad decisions. Rasputin was known to be highly influential and manipulative and the Tsarina was presumed to be weak and desperate and so the influence of Rasputin allowed for the wrong decisions to be made, and after months of suffering that the lower class people endured, a revolution started, which later ended the Romanov Dynasty. Rasputin’s power to heal Alexei won the trust of the Tsar and Tsarina and many people were against this because they did not know why Rasputin was a part of their lives. Source F is a view of what the people believed and it shows Rasputin’s control. The Tsarina is drawn to look up at Rasputin and the Tsar’s eyes are closed symbolising that he is blind to what is presumably going on due to the control and manipulation that Rasputin had over him and the Tsarina. Although Rasputin’s influence and decisions caused havoc in Russia, it was the Tsarina that entrusted him with the rulings of the country showing that his influence was her …show more content…
We are then shown the Tsar’s response where he pushes the news aside as if it were a lie. This shows the Tsars lack of care and leadership and also his ignorance. To make things worse and to prove that Tsarina Alexandra was an ineffective leader, Alexandra wrote back to the Tsar saying that it is a ‘hooligan movement’ and states that the situations are not bad, the people are just causing problems and then she blames the DUMA and says that they should behave themselves. This is an example of one of the many broken communications that took place and because of the Tsarina’s letter, nothing was done to help the people and so the people became angrier and turned against the Tsar, all because of the Tsarina’s lie or ignorance. This source is supported by Source C that shows that Alexandra, under the influence of Rasputin, started changing the ministers to people that were good in Rasputin’s eyes. She also followed his ideas and instructions on how to run the country, which caused more turmoil. . Nicholas was advised not to leave for the war, not to let his wife being in charge and he was told of the chaos going on in the country and yet he did not listen to his advisors, but rather listened to his inexperienced wife. This shows that the cause of the fall of the Romanov

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Rasputin is a contradiction, which is why when the nickname “Holy Devil” is introduced by ex-monk Iliador, it was widely accepted and used, because the people felt as if his actions contradicted what he claimed to be, which strengthened the mistrust from them. Lastly, there are other factors that contributed to Rasputin’s death. “Late in 1916, with the war going badly for Russia, food shortages leading to open revolt and the tsar and tsarina increasingly isolated, a plot was concocted to kill Rasputin” (Nott).…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That is why Nicholas and his family were killed and that's why Bolsheviks overthrew him. Nicholas the second was executed on July 6, 1918 with his wife and and children. He was the last Tsar of Russia under the Romanov rule. He was known as “Bloody Nicholas” because of the way he handled Bloody Sunday. His role in World War 1 and Bloody Sunday led to his…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Woodrow Wilson Book Report

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Richard obviously put much effort into this well-written book, and it is therefore both an enjoyable book to read as well a valuable tool to aid in understanding the animosity Russians felt toward America during the Cold War period, much of which was triggered by this episode. Nearly any reader can gain a new understanding of history by reading this book. The book is very important in understanding the history of US-Soviet relations, since it shows exactly why the Soviets disliked and distrusted the Americans so much. There is much in the book showing how the Americans continued backing the White Russian government (even if they did say directly that that was what they were doing), even though they knew, saw, and were told about how the Czarist leaders and army were abusing and maltreating the Russian people (let alone what they were doing to the Americans). Richard’s insinuation is that the Russians surely resented the Americans for this, and that the United States is therefore to blame for the souring of relations between the country.…

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, this publication influences nonfiction, historical studies as well as, unseen objects in life that all people need to observe. From reading this, I took the time to reflection my own life. The Family Romanov displays to us many commodities that reside in ourselves. Some of these are satisfying, and others are lousy.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nicholas Romanov Failure

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He firmly believed that Russia’s well being and prosperity depended on the Romanov autocracy. Susan Walker describes Romanov’s outdated policies saying: “[Nicholas] had total faith in the age-old formula which ‘reduced the essential elements of the Russian Empire to three: Orthodoxy, Autocracy, and Nationality.’ These sacred beliefs left little, if any, room for the development of new ideas or Russian progress. Nicholas’ close minded and weak nature was, in essence, the beginning of the downfall of himself, his family, and his nation.” (Walker) Like his father, Nicholas II did little to modernize Russia.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Romanov Dynasty Essay

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Russian Empire under the rule of the Romanov Dynasty for almost 300 years grew and cemented itself as a major global power, equalling its Western European counterparts. Through massive technological change, the kindling of international relations, and social and economic crises alike, imperial Russia was piloted by tsars and tsarinas to rise as a modern empire. From its ambiguous beginnings in 1613, the Romanov dynasty was born from the boyar nobles of feudal Russia, bearing historically significant figures like Ivan the Great, Ivan the Terrible, Peter the Great, and Catherine the Great; these characters formed a foundation that Russia would stand on for centuries to come. With economic, social, and political evolution, Russia saw the continuity…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lennon Research Paper

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Czar Nicholas II. (Russian monarch) Decided to shoot some of the protesters, which led to even more unrest with Russian Soldiers. Soldiers were treated badly, and on March, 1, they shot any Officer who didn’t want to rebel with them. They forced Russia's Czar, Nicholas II to step down as president of the cold, cold part of the world.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fall of the Romanov Dynasty was, in large part, due to the inadequacy and ineptitude of Tsar Nicholas II, who triggered; social, political and economic discontent, and hence, brought about his own downfall. He played a key role in the declination of his empire and thereby induced his own deposition through; his inability to lead effectively as a sovereign, as he didn’t possess the necessary character traits to rule and was determined to maintain his autocracy. Another contribution to this (his downfall), was his involvement in WWI, due to its disastrous effects on his government. These factors were instrumental in the ruination of Nicholas II and are part of the role he played in his own downfall.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Romanov Massacre

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages

    On July 16, 1918, in Yekaterinburg, Russia, Tsar Nicholas II, his wife and his five children, along with his loyal servants, descended downstairs and gathered together for a family photo shoot. However, the family photoshoot turned out to be a deceptive trick created by a communist leader, Vladimir Lenin and the Bolshevik troops to lure the royal Russian family, the Romanovs, out of hiding and to end Russia’s monarchical rule. Once the Romanovs and their servants made themselves known “...suddenly, a dozen armed men burst into the room and gunned down the imperial family in a hail of gunfire” (“Romanov Family Executed”). Not only did they open fire on the family members but the troops also continued stabbing those who were barely remained…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Downfall

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Because of his role in the war as the Supreme Commander, his people began to blame him for the military defeats and also the economic conflicts. This intensified the political disillusionment about Tsar Nicholas’s rule over Russia. Thus, Tsar Nicholas’s poor…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Romanov Dynasty reigned in Russia from 1613 until its fall in 1917. It was the last imperial dynasty to rule Russia. The fall was prompted by the February Revolution of 1917 which lead to abdication of Tsar Nicholas II. The fall of the Romanov Dynasty was precipitated by a number of changes in Russia, specifically changing attitudes towards the autocratic power held by the Tsar and a shift in the way many Russians viewed the Tsar himself. Many of these changes were caused by the advancement of Russia in terms of industry and the fact that Industrialisation had finally reached Russia.…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one were to have asked a Russian peasant what revolution means to them, they might answer samovol’shchina, or, translated “doing what you want.” In Sheila Fitzpatrick’s book The Russian Revolution she traces three broad themes through the course of the revolution that existed before 1917 and would continue until about the time of 1934. She examines the class struggle that was an important part of the revolution as well as the leadership that lead the Russian citizens through these tumuloous decades and she also examines the modernization that Russia experienced. Fitzpatrick breaks her book down in a chronological order in which she spends her introduction writing about the immediate events that happened prior to the outbreak of the revolution so that the reader, whether an undergraduate student, graduate student or just a fan of Russian history, can gain a true understanding of the air of change that was happening in…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, there are many longer term factors that could be held responsible for the collapse of the Tsarist regime, Russia was also a very backward nation and because of that it suffered many long-term social and economic problem such as extreme poverty and inequality, which led to a rise in opposition to the Tsarist regime and many revolutionary groups. Grigori Rasputin was introduced to Tsar Nicholas II and Tsarina Alexandra in 1907 in hope that he could cure their son Alexei who was suffering from internal bleeding as a result of his haemophilia B. He had been invited to the imperial court because the Tsarina was desperate for a cure for her son and had heard that Rasputin had extraordinary gifts of healing. Rasputin did appear to help Alexei with his condition, but, ‘Rasputin did not, of course, have the magical or devilish powers that the more superstitious claimed for him, but he was a very good amateur psychologist’ 1 (this is a reliable source…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To what extent was Tsar Nicholas Responsible for the fall of the Romanov dynasty Tsar Nicholas was responsible for the fall of the Romanov dynasty and accelerating the russian revolution. Tsar Nicholas was a major cause of the downfall but his wife tsarina and Rasputin also contributed. The tsar left to the war which was already creating uproar in russia as it was weakening the economy, creating worldwide hunger and unhappiness throughout. Unhappiness lead to demonstrations that developed into political action against the tsar. Furthermore the tsar;s leadership and understanding of reality was abysmal during the war.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People’s encounter motivated most of the protest actions in the Russian Revolution. Even though their effort did not gain a good result to give people a better life, people’s encounter still played an essential role in the Russian Revolution. The Russian Revolution accomplished the exchange between the czarist government…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays