The Exclusionary Rule In Criminal Investigation

Improved Essays
The Exclusionary Rule
The gathering of evidence is an important part of the Criminal Investigation, and ultimately the Criminal Trial. Certain procedure such as the issuing of a warrant and probable cause must be followed in the gathering of evidence, in order to prevent the possibility of any evidence being dismissed at trial. The exclusionary rule is a court-created rule which was adopted in 1914 (Weeks v. United States), and then first applied in state trials in the case Mapp v. Ohio. By definition, the exclusionary rule is one of the simplest rules in the legal system which excludes the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. (Garland, 2015, p264) In other words, if the evidence is obtained in a manner that violated the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Unusual Suspect Cases

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Case Study: The Unusual Suspect According to the case The Unusual Suspect, Diann had committed an embezzlement fraud that she pleaded guilty to embezzling approximately $500,000 from her employer and she was sentenced for 18 months in Florida prison. Diann's fraud scheme is a form of an anti-organizational crime, and she had committed several types of the fraud schemes such as: First, she started to mistakenly pay for her vacation expense through her company’s account, Second, she called the payroll company and told the company to make changes to her salary range. Third, she made duplications of her bonus checks.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R Vs Misaac Case Study

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    32) HOLDING a) The trial judge engaged in speculative reasoning while rejecting evidence which led to a conviction and denied the Apl. a fair trial, which justifies a retrial. b) Not answered. c) Not answered.(para.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 vote that the evidence was illegally obtained and thus could not be used in the court of…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Respondent requested that the cocaine be excluded from evidence, but the trial court denied his request and he was found guilty. The issue…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The evidence presented was too defining to not believe. The Colorado Supreme court backed the use of their evidence with the fact that, “in 1925 that evidence secured through searches and seizures in violation of the Colorado Constitution was still admissible in the state’s courts.” (Cortner) Thus, the court was allowed to use the evidence from the search and it would be accepted, even though done illegally, since it was under the law of Colorado. Meanwhile, Wolf and his attorney’s argument and objection was that the evidenced shouldn’t be introduced or yet only allowed to be used.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Identify the case: The case California v. Greenwood can be found in volume 486 of the United States Supreme Court Reporter, page 35. The case was argued January 11, 1988 and decided on May 16, 1988. Background information: In February of 1984, a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agent informed Jenny Stracner, an investigator for the Laguna Beach Police Department, that a U-Haul truck full of illegal drugs was en route to Greenwood’s address.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Da Vs Harris Case Study

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Police officers did not have the right to approach the porch of Jardines’ house to find evidence, this is know as exclusionary rule,improperly gathered evidence may not be introduce in a criminal…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Other exceptions include open fields, canine sniff, booking search and inventory, public safety, and officer safety. The purpose for this rule can be looked at like a way for law enforcements to conduct searches and seizures that do not violate the Fourth Amendment and individuals that have had their rights violated. This legal rule first made its appearance during the U.S. Supreme court case Weeks v. United States (1914). Freemont Weeks was arrested under suspicion of using the U.S. mail to transmit lottery tickets.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Merritt Vs Dillard

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages

    P. 56(c). While the Court must view inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, “this does not lessen the burden of the non-moving party in any way.” Rollins v. TechSouth, Inc., 833 F.2d 1525, 1528 (11th Cir. 1987). Thus, the nonmovant still bears the burden of providing “sufficient evidence” for every element she must prove. Id. (Citing…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elizabeth, I do concede that Dripps model of the contingent exclusionary rule is fascinating; yet, it is my opinion that there are pros and cons. It is without doubt that the present exclusionary rule is controversial. I also concede that there isn’t a need to completely re-invent the wheel. Conversely, Dripps argues in regards of the contingent suppression order in which prosecutors would have to choose between accepting exclusion of evidence obtained through infractions of the Fourth Amendment or accepting the imposition of a damages judgment obtained through infractions of the Fourth Amendment or accepting the imposition of a damages judgment against the state under an administration of statutory damages (Tipton, 2010).…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In view of the modification of the exclusionary rule, the Court of Appeals' judgment cannot stand in this case. Only respondent Leon contended that no reasonably well trained police officer could have believed that there existed probable cause to search his house. However, the record establishes that the police officer’s reliance on the state-court judge's determination of…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Al Quade Pros And Cons

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages

    material support. Finally, under this statute Congress made the decision to target anyone in the chain of causation. the key term here is support the government is criminalizing anyone that provides support to terrorist foreign terrorist organization.) passed the “Material Support Statute.”…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 1: Discuss the arguments for and against the exclusionary rule. Be sure to provide examples and explain your position on the exclusionary rule. Answer: The exclusionary rule is “A judicial rule that makes evidence obtained in violation of the U.S. Constitution, state, or federal laws, or court rules inadmissible” (Gardner & Anderson, 2016, p. 214).…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The words freedom, rights, equality, and liberty are important words to America. These four words emulate what the United States Constitution stand for. The United States Constitution was created to allow every citizen freedom to pursue their goals and dreams, as well as make important decisions regarding the direction of their life. Nearly 300 years later, the United States still tries to follow the laws and rights granted by the Constitution. There are many individuals who abide and uplift the Constitution; however, others chose to neglect what was written in the Constitution.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    pp. 50-52 United States. Congress. House of Representatives. Committee on the Judiciary.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays