The Ethics Of Fieldwork In Daniel Keyes Flowers For Algernon

Improved Essays
Did you know that almost 19 million people participate in clinical trials, but it is impossible to say how many are harmed? A character named Charlie was involved in a test to see if we can artificially improve human intelligence. Some say it was for the good of science, but many others can argue otherwise. The argument has arisen because of the side effects of the operation, the fact that the Ethics of Fieldwork were not followed, and the unfortunate death of Charlie. The short story “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes, Scientists performed an operation to possibly triple the IQ of the test subject: Charlie. The doctors had good reason for the operation, but when they chose Charlie as the test subject, it was a not a good decision.
In the first place, it was wrong of Dr. Strauss and Dr. Nemur to choose Charlie as a test subject for the sake that the doctors did not follow the “Ethics of Fieldwork” and how they took advantage of his position. In the text it states, “Dr. Strauss says I shud rite down what I think and evrwy thing that happins to me from now on. I dont know why but he says its importint so they will see if they will use me.”(Keyes 182). The quote shows that Charlie was not the best at reading/writing and that Charlie is not the most intelligent person. This makes him easily persuaded and can be possibly manipulated. This is probably the reason why they wanted Charlie to be their test subject for no one in their right mind would want to have an operation on them. Another quote from the text that suggests that the doctors should have never operated on charlie is because they did not follow the “Ethics of Fieldwork”. It states, “The principals of respect for persons… (includes)... two separate moral requirements: the requirement to acknowledge autonomy and the requirement to protect those with diminished autonomy.”(“The Belmont Report”). The doctors did not follow this code in which they should not operate on someone who is “Susceptible to Coercion” meaning one who is easily influenced one way. Charlie Gordon is “Susceptible to Coercion” yet the doctors knowingly used Charlie. Someone might say that the doctors did follow the “Ethics of Fieldwork” and Charlie was fully aware of what was happening. A quote they may use to support their claim is when it states, “Then Dr Nemur nodded he said all right maybe your right. We will use Charlie. When he said that I got so excited I jumped up and shook his hand for being so good to me… After the operashun Im gonna try yo be smart. Im gonna try awful hard”(Keyes 185). Although this claim is evident it is untrue because Charlie still had a low IQ and surely could not understand what was going to happen to him or the possible risks in the operation. Another reason why the doctors made a bad choice in choosing Charlie is by reason of that the few improvements of Charlie were completely reversed and the operation had almost no contribution to science. An excerpt from the text reads, “Deterioration progressing. I have become absent-minded. Algernon died two days ago. Dissection shows my predictions were right. His brain had decreased in weight and there was a general smoothing of the cerebral convolutions…”(Keyes 205). The quote expresses how Charlie did indeed become more intelligent, but also how those improvements of Charlie were reversed in the story. Since they were reversed there was almost little if not completely no point in the operation to increase human intelligence artificially. In addition to the reduction of Charlie’s tripled IQ there was no point whatsoever in the operation. It even states in the text, “I must not become emotional. The facts and the results of the experiments are clear, and the more sensational aspects of my own rapid climb cannot obscure the fact that the tripling of intelligence
…show more content…
They wrongly did this because it caused the death of Charlie, they did not follow the “Ethics of Fieldwork”, and the few improvements were completely reversed, so the operation was pointless. Was a small glimpse of being smart enough to pay the price of death, what is the value of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    He was chosen to have an operation on him for research to see it would make him smarter. Charlie willingly agreed to the operation because he understood that it would make him smarter, that’s exactly what he wants. In progress report 7, Charlie describes how he feels after having the operation done. He doesn’t quite understand why he has to write the progress reports but he understands that it’s important. Charlie writes, “Then when I am smart they will talk to me and I can sit with them and listen like Joe Carp and Frank and Gimpy do when they talk and have a discushen about important things” (Keyes 15).…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Maybe they aren’t going to use me. ”(Keyes,54) So Charlie is going to have an operation to make him become smarter. Here are three reasons why I think that Charlie shouldn’t have the operation.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlie wasn’t harmed or treated unfairly, however they didn’t tell him the possible outcome of the experiment. The psychologists tried to benefit him and other people with the same disability. To the best of their ability, the psychologists took responsibility for the project. As far as the integrity part goes, they weren’t completely honest with him about whether or not it would work or the outcome of the situation, later on towards the end of the book they did admit they weren’t totally sure. Charlie wasn’t aware of what he was getting into, I don’t think the surgery was fair because charlie didn't know the possible danger.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Medical Practices

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In places that are not the U.S. the experiments only get worse and the talk about reparations are in the distant future. By allowing studies to go on for decades, the patients are only subjected to harsher conditions and the self realization that the help they thought they were receiving is never going to arrive. The quick and udder destruction of unethical studies are necessary to allow those who were victim to feel somewhat…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Also, because charlie eventually declined to the same IQ level? Charlie was grateful for his time being smart and was pleased with his decision. He learned to understand his feelings and showing his feelings. Not only did he understand his own feelings he also understood other people's. After the operation charlie had better relationships with people because he could understand…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Should significant resources be expended in order to phase out the use of animals in preclinical testing? Topic Preclinical animal testing is an outdated research method which is inaccurate, unethical, and extremely costly; sponsor companies should expend the necessary resources to begin adopting non-animal testing models as they become available in order to progressively reduce, and ultimately discontinue their use of animals. The contents of this paper will discuss supporting ethical, scientific, and economic evidence, in addition to evaluating possible opposing arguments, and proposing a relevant plan of action. Background Preclinical animal testing has been a boiler plate topic for nearly a century.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the book and movie Flowers for Algernon, Charlie, a mentally handicapped man, has a surgery to make him smarter, but later finds that it is temporary. When Charlie begins to get smarter, he starts to get rejected by his friends at the factory. All he wanted was to fit in, but when he became smart, he was treated as though he was an alien. Dr. Nemur and Dr. Strauss begin to argue and everything isn’t what Charlie thought it would be. Then he slowly begins to go back to who he was before.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlie got to see that no matter what he could never be intelligent for the rest of his life and he was okay with…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If anyone could gain extreme knowledge, even for a small period, that would open their eyes to reality, would it not be reasonable? On the other hand, wouldn’t that make every passing minute filled with intellect worth the hardship and pain that would eventually follow? To tell the truth, some may think that in the end Charlie gained little for how much he lost, but sometimes, the little we gain in life is of much more importance than what it may seem that in the end we lose. In the short story “Flowers for Algernon” written by Daniel Keyes, considered Science fiction, the main character Charlie has Down's syndrome and is selected to have a surgery on his brain to make him smarter. Throughout the book he writes progress reports that show how he progresses after his operation.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tuskegee syphilis experiment was a horrific study done on African American men in 1932, with many unethical actions. The men were told that there were being treated for having “Bad blood”, when in fact they had a sexual transmitted disease that can lead to painful, and deadly symptoms such as hallucinations, weak nervous system, or even cardiovascular problems. The are many unethical points in this study that were overlooked. One being is that the men were not informed on the whole purpose of the experiment or the dangers of the study. In the beginning I understood the sole purpose of the study, and how it could have been beneficial for them and whoever else had the disease.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This suggests that Charlie does not understand the hatred and mean people before his surgery. This is a good thing. It is best described by a famous English scholar Thomas Gray, he once said, “ignorance is bliss” (Gray) in his Ode on a Distant Prospect of Eton College. This applies directly to Charlie. What he does not know cannot hurt him.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people have the idea that during WW1 Nazis killed and tortured many Jews freely and even willingly. What Milgram is doing in his experiment is trying to figure out how easily people follow orders, orders that could harm and potentially kill someone. Milgram got participants through a newspaper article, and paying them $450 to complete the experiment (random sampling). The experiment was carried out in a lab at Yale, causing ecological validity to be good, as it 's a very trustworthy institution and subjects are more likely to abide when in a laboratory compared to a real world setting. He was using a deceiving method by tricking the “teacher” to believe that every time he flipped a set of 30 switches, which were ranged from Slight Shock…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram Experiment Introduction Many people question whether the Milgram experiment was ethical or not, and whether the experiment should had been allowed at all. But like most significant psychological discoveries, sometimes ethics could’ve been overseen in order to obtain great data. Because of Milgram experiment, psychologists today have a better understanding of group dynamics. Milgram’s experiment enabled better understanding of human obedience to an authority figure. Ethics that might have been violated throughout the process of Milgram’s study can be justified in the experiment itself.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Night Doctors

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The infamous Night Doctors of the 19th century (and late 18th century) haunted the lives of African Americans, snatching innocent minds and bodies away from their rightful owners. Night Doctors are widely known for their history in body-snatching, which was simply the act of kidnapping and killing innocent blacks (mostly blacks) off the streets for the use of medical experimentation. For dozens of years, scientists, and even just the modern, everyday population have debated on the subject of whether the experiments done by Night Doctors, though horrific and unjust, had made a big or important enough impact on the movement of medical research to somewhat justify their actions. Treatment from the notorious Night Doctors ruined and wounded more…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays