Having religion is very common throughout the ages, and it still diffuse these days. but do we ask our self why is the majority of human beings have their own religion? Nowadays, each one of us practicing the religion as the way we like, and this would probably generate great issue or distortion in religious descriptions. There is no doubt that the variation of religions is strongly wide, and sometimes these differences cause problems or war as it happened before in world war two. However, I think when most of the people practice a religion with the right instructions, many universal problems will disappear in short matter of time. Therefore, I respect the different opinions about a person embracing religion, but I believe that if a man converted
…show more content…
B “The most severe criticism of dominant such as Christianity, Islam, Judaism is that they promote aggressive behavior. As history convincingly shows, adherents of these traditions have supported a wide range of activities, including warfare, terrorism, genocide, witch hunts, and slave trading, that were boosted by the alleged support of God” (Grind Bjorn P. 282). In other words, that Christianity, Islam, and Judaism have the responsibilities of terrorism activities and warfare. In my opinion, we cannot badly judge on whole religion because of the human actions because the people who made these actions not the religions, and I believe if we take close look at what the religion discerptions says about these actions we will fine totally the opposite that what people …show more content…
Because the majority of religions do not promote hostility and violence but the people whom planting these ideas in human’s mind, and this is contrary in most religions. In instance, in the accident of Sept.11 2001 the majority of people accused of Islam to commit this heinous event. Regardless of whether perpetrator is a Muslim or not, the question here does Islam as religion promoted to such horrific action? Or people who have the aggressive thoughts? In my experience as Muslim, I never had or read in the entire Islamic instructions about anything encourage us to do like this actions to indecent
B “The most severe criticism of dominant such as Christianity, Islam, Judaism is that they promote aggressive behavior. As history convincingly shows, adherents of these traditions have supported a wide range of activities, including warfare, terrorism, genocide, witch hunts, and slave trading, that were boosted by the alleged support of God” (Grind Bjorn P. 282). In other words, that Christianity, Islam, and Judaism have the responsibilities of terrorism activities and warfare. In my opinion, we cannot badly judge on whole religion because of the human actions because the people who made these actions not the religions, and I believe if we take close look at what the religion discerptions says about these actions we will fine totally the opposite that what people …show more content…
Because the majority of religions do not promote hostility and violence but the people whom planting these ideas in human’s mind, and this is contrary in most religions. In instance, in the accident of Sept.11 2001 the majority of people accused of Islam to commit this heinous event. Regardless of whether perpetrator is a Muslim or not, the question here does Islam as religion promoted to such horrific action? Or people who have the aggressive thoughts? In my experience as Muslim, I never had or read in the entire Islamic instructions about anything encourage us to do like this actions to indecent