The Dichotomy Of Democracy

Great Essays
One of the most fundamental orthodoxy of American political life, is the dichotomy between democracy and capitalism. This dichotomy stems from the tension of individuals trying to achieve economic prosperity, while the community is trying to achieve relative political equality. There is much debate about whether in our current state of economic inequality and disparity, political equality can be achieved. The nature of this debate stems from the different ways democracy is defined. Many scholars, including Howard Zinn have defined democracy operationally rather than conclusively thus creating a focus that goes beyond political institutions and addresses the quality of life of the citizens. This focus on equality and fairness of outcomes generally …show more content…
In 2010, in the case of Citizens United, the Supreme Court concluded that corporations are people and have the same inherent first amendment rights of everyday Americans. The result of this decision is that big corporations can legally donate any amount of money to various political causes and as a result get preference in terms of the laws. Without question, this undermines the very nature of a democratic society as it creates a system in which big business get to dictate the political decisions of our country in a major way. As analyzed by a statistical study done by the Princeton Journal, “when the preferences of economic elites and the stands of organized interest groups are controlled for, the preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact on policy.” If the average American has little or no power to influence decisions impacting the policies of the country then the next question is, “Who does?” The Princeton study argues that interest groups do have a substantial independent impact on policy and a few groups (particularly labor unions) do represent the average citizen’s view reasonably well. However, the interest group system as a whole does not, and the most influential business oriented groups are negatively correlated with the average citizen’s wishes. This means that the average citizen is not being fairly represented. Under this contemporary context, Tocqueville thesis of America’s political equality and great “middling” due to a separation from a royalty based system, begins to unravel. This is because while certainly different than traditional royalty, America’s has its own power elite that monopolized important decision making. In this system of interest groups and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Within Lasch’s three chapters, “Does Democracy Deserve to Survive?,” “Communitarianism or Populism?,” and “Conversation and the Civic Art,” he highlights the decay of civic virtue, while calling attention to the fact that American democracy was at its best when there was “small-scale production through cooperative buying and selling” (81). Small-scale production required qualities of responsibility and self-reliance, claiming that something more than morality that can generate virtue. Lasch refers to the “probing social commentary that took shape in the latter half of the nineteenth century, when it became evident that small property was disappearing and people began to ask themselves whether the virtues associated with proprietorship could be preserved, in…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When you give big corporations or groups the power to not only voice their opinion, but also influence the thought of the masses, it strips the people from thinking for themselves. Corporations have an unfair advantage because of the large amount of money they have. These big corporations practically own the Senate and have the power to heavily influence their decision [Doc D]. Touching back on how big corporations overpower the people's opinions, their money is what allows this to happen. Because of this court ruling, big corporations, unions and foreign companies "drown out" the people's voice [Doc L].…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mcadam And Kloos Analysis

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1964, 74 percent of Americans trusted their government “to do the right thing”. Contrastingly, only 19 percent believed the same when asked in October of 2013 (McAdam and Kloos, 325). The 2013 government shutdown and debt ceiling crisis has only fueled this lack of trust with many American citizens outright wary of Congress. Similarly, Eduardo Porter writes much of the same in his article in the New York Times. He writes that the US democracy has gotten increasingly dysfunctional in a time marked by a progressively polarized government and sweeping income inequality.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Paper Assignment Democracy is, obviously, one of the most commonly used concepts in modern society; but despite the frequent use, there is no universally agreed interpretation of the notion. The validity of this claim becomes particularly noticeable when comparing the interpretations of Thomas Jefferson and Carl Schmitt. This comparison is conducted with an aim to choose the most plausible approach to democracy which could be implemented in our contemporary U.S. society. It’s argued that although both Jefferson and Schmitt criticized their contemporaries for apathy in political participation, they suggested different ways through which Americans could contribute to building a democratic society.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Amendment Cons

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although the Constitution as ratified in 1788 excluded several key demographics, developments throughout history have steadily rendered our democracy more inclusive, creating the promise of a government in which all people have a voice in its path forward. However, one recent Supreme Court decision has acted as a deadly corrosive agent for the promise of democracy in America; the majority in the Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC has extended First Amendment speech rights to include unlimited donations made by corporations. The decision has opened floodgates allowing the wealthiest Americans to exercise increased control over the political process, thus drowning out the voices of the majority. In order to recover from this striking blow…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Democracy Dbq

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On a spectrum of authoritarian and democratic states, Senegal is further towards the latter. According to Freedom house, Senegal has a ranking of two out of seven in both political liberties and civil rights. (1) Senegal currently has a presidential republic system of government that is working for the country. (2) This system of government is successful in Senegal. This is evident by multiple peaceful transitions of power, example and aid given to surrounding countries, and the ability of the government to hold referendums meant to improve the political system there.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Recently, a number of academics have made the argument that the United States is no longer necessarily a democratic republic, but is more similar to a plutocracy, or a government structure in which the wealthiest citizens control key government activities. In this paper, I will make the argument that the United States has devolved from a democratic republic into a quasi-democratic representative plutocracy,…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Democracy for Sale Five years ago Citizens United spearheaded a campaign to steal the people's power and unfortunately the Supreme Court decided to rule in favor of the controversial right-wing group, in the devastating ruling of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. This disastrous move by the "Supreme Court scrapped the previous campaign finance laws and essentially declared that companies are allowed to buy politicians by circumventing restrictions via PACs, political action committees" (Tedford), thus stealing the power of the masses and giving our power to those whose bank accounts resemble that of a country's population. Sadly, the affluent 1% of Americans hold more power than the other 99% of this nation because of the current government's pay to win democracy. Without any…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It has been established by our Founding Fathers that the nation is to run on a government in which the power of the officials is limited and subject to the say of the people. A guarantee of this principle is the form of government in which America holds today. Although the system is seemingly ideal, it can develop deep cracks that root to problems and controversy over power and constitutionality. The operations of interest groups, political parties, and election campaigns play large factors into whether or not this form of government succeeds or fails. These are the stems that connect the work of the government to the people and how citizens contribute to policy and are fueled by the standards of democracy.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of selling one’s vote, while technically free exchange and perceived as beneficial for both parties, should not be allowed in America because it encourages a lack of virtue and responsibility which is essential for America’s government. Moreover, a vote is not just about self-interest in terms of short-term monetary return. A system that is based only on momentary gain cannot be sustained in the long-run. In voting, we have a duty to preserve the voting system itself for our own future and for generations to come; auctioning that right to the highest bidder undermines every other component of the system that supports the right to vote to begin with.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vega 1 Breanna Vega Professor Olmos English 101 23 April 2016 Citizens Rule Democracy is known to be a strong form of government, because it gives full power to the people of the nation. Many argue about how a democracy works, but do not understand it includes difficult tasks for it to be successful. In Cornel West’s reading, “The Deep Democratic Tradition in America,” the idea of a strong democracy is by the people, but the promise of a democracy has failed. In order to keep the promise of strong democracy individual practices such as voting rights, the principle of protection, and the representation of each individual must be practiced under no circumstances.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On December 29, 1940, the thirty-second President of the United States, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, delivered a speech via radio entitled "The Great Arsenal of Democracy. " The announcement was made a year before the Attack on Pearl Harbor, at a time when Germany had occupied much of Europe and threatened Britain. This speech 's purpose was to promise of the United States ' indirect support of the countries fighting for democracy and freedom in the Second World War, like Britain, against the Nazis and their allies (the Axis) through provision of weaponry and other supplies. However, in order to do so, he thanks current contributors and requests the help of more American people to put in their efforts to produce this massive amount of weaponry. In this time of crisis, the United States is not as safe as it thinks it is.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American democracy is driven by the foundation of equality. According to Tocqueville, the American Revolution had produced a great degree of social equality among the social classes. Conditions of equality in America, gives its citizens the ability to strive for equal status—socially and economically. Democracy allowed influence to be taken from a few aristocrats and given to the people—which leads to the end of legal differences in status, of noble ranks and titles, and of hereditary privileges. However, this is not to say that there is not a potential for a highly individualized society brought about through equality.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every nation and country has a way of running itself; a way to govern what is considered lawful and unlawful. In the United States of American, there is a massive controversial debate about whether our democracy is majoritarian or if it is more pluralistic in nature. Some may argue that the mass public, or every citizen in the country, is able to control the government’s actions. Others will state that many groups are able to work together amongst themselves to be able to allow more involvement of the citizens in a majority of the nation’s decisions. Both of these ideas of how our government works are similar in ways as well as different in many other ways.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is democracy? Democracy to me means freedom. Freedom to pick and choose the lifestyle I want to lead in life. The freedom to be able to follow any religion I please and marry whoever I choose. Also the freedom to own property and choose where to live.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays