The Death Penalty Analysis

Improved Essays
In the United States there are several topics that are considered morally ambiguous. Among these contended topics is the death penalty. There are many arguments for and against capital punishment. One proponent for the death penalty is Ernest van den Haag who in his article, “The Ultimate Punishment,” argues a case for the death penalty. I believe he successfully counters the arguments against the death penalty leading me to believe it is not something that should be viewed as inhumane and wrong. I will argue that the death penalty is not morally ambiguous but a justified sentence some deserve. Van den Haag believes that in upholding a death sentence, potential murderers are being deterred, victims protected, and justice served. Many may …show more content…
Those opposed to the death penalty use this as one of their reasons to do away with it. Because it is so finite, a wrongful conviction with capital punishment is not something that can be rectified. Death is final, there is no reversing it. Just because the death penalty is a possible punishment, though, does not mean it is the answer to every sentencing. It also does not mean it is something that is carried out immediately. Inmates sentenced to death sit on death row for years before actually being executed. This time allows for appeals which may end up clearing the name of the convicted. Since it is nearly impossible to be 100% sure that the correct person is apprehended and tried for a crime, the death penalty should not be handed out lightly. This does not mean it should not exist at all, though. With technology constantly changing and advancing, the risk of making a fatal error in these cases becomes less and less …show more content…
Once someone is convicted and sentenced to death, they are not immediately killed in the most cost effective way. The manner in which they file for appeals could cause them to live for several more years. The cost of them living coupled with the cost of the appeals and the medical care that is required to be given to them could be pretty pricey. The cost of a life sentence is also expensive but not to the extent of a death row inmate. However, with a death sentence victims of the family may feel more of a sense of justice. Murderers with a life sentence have a lot more privileges than those with a death sentence. A convict with a life sentence is also able to corrupt and influence fellow inmates as well as any followers they have in society who are not incarcerated. A perfect example of this is Charles Manson. Even from prison he still has a lot of reach and has hundreds of people willing to do his bidding for him. Death row inmates are separated from the rest of the general population in prison. This means that nonviolent offenders are not at risk of being harmed or influenced by murderers on death row. Nonviolent offenders, like a car thief, and people facing life sentences are all thrown in together. This means a teenager tried as an adult could be stuck in a cell with a subhuman being with violent tendencies. The likelihood of this is reduced with the death

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is a controversial subject with plenty of opponents and supporters. The supporters of the death penalty make the argument that there are some criminals that as long as they are alive they’re a danger to everybody else. The opponents of the death penalty say that a judge and a jury shouldn’t be able to decide whether or not a person should live or die. Whether or not the death penalty is a fair and just punishment for criminals has been something that has been disputed ever since the death penalty was created. One of the death penalties supporters is Ernest Van Den Haag.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, Jeffrey Dahmer was a notorious serial killer and known cannibal who raped, murdered, and dismembered his victims. Instead of facing retributive punishment for his crimes, he was sentenced to multiple life terms and was later killed by an inmate. A person who has taken the life of another purposely and premeditated deserves to face the punishment of death under law. Executing a criminal who murdered another human being offers a way of retribution to the loved ones of the victim because even though they cannot change what has happened or have their loved one back, by seeing justice be served it assures to them that there will be no other victims and families who face the same tragedy, giving them some closure.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty has no consistency, and it seems like a random pick of who get executed or not. In a country where we value equality and our rights, this system is not fair. There are several factors that affect how likely a criminal is to be put on Death Row. For example, Hull talks about the “Vagaries of…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When someone commits a crime there are many punishments they can receive. House arrest, fines, jail time are some of the most common. But one type of punishment is the most polarizing of them all, the death penalty. Whether the death penalty should be used is often a debated topic between the science of killing someone for their crimes, or the more religious beliefs that it is cruel and unusual to use the death penalty. When considering people who were sentenced to the death penalty like Gregg, Penry, and Baze.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ernest Van Den Haag begins his article asking if the death penalty deters more than life in prison. Haag says that even though life in prison is unpleasant, it is still very different from taking the life of a person. He says that 99% of people on the death row would rather be in life sentence (Pg,392 right column). I think anyone would prefer to stay alive, but isn’t a life sentence just like the end of a persons life? They will be confined to a cell for the rest of their life.…

    • 2134 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ernest van den Haag, “The Ultimate Punishment: A Defense of Capital Punishment” (Analyzing Moral Issues, 234-238 in the 6th Ed.) Ernest van den Haag idea for government role was “securing rights and duties by specifying them through laws and enforcing the laws.” Haag argues that capital punishment is morally permissible on the arguments of retribution rather than deterrence it can be clearly reflected in his work. Ernest also addresses the idea of justice, and deterrence. Ernest van den Haag main point was, if the government should not only have the right to punish but to also enforce more extreme laws.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death sentences are imposed in a criminal justice system that treats you better if you are rich and guilty than if you are poor and innocent. Also if the crime the person committed was vicious crime,they should be sent to death. Because if a dangerous person did something to a innocent person and hurt them in any way, the innocent person would be living the pain its whole life and could be thinking of suicide because of the pain they go through.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Opposing Viewpoints

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages

    "Transferring an inmate from death row to life without parole allows for the aggrieved families to have a sense of calmness in their life without having to relive the tragic events over and over again.’ (“Preface to “Does the Death Penalty Serve the Public Good””)" He explains this not only helps the grieving families feel the criminal has been punished, but it reduces the risk of innocent people being…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is viewed as excessive and harsh, yet the criminal assumed all consequences when they committed the crime as mentioned earlier. This punishment is argued to be morally degrading to some even though there is nothing that can make the crime committed any better morally. The social consequences are effective with the use of the death penalty for the murderer. The murderer has dehumanized themselves by killing another person, so much that they can no longer live among the living. Even though this may be view as inhumane, Hagg still believes that the punishment is warranted.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty is the most severe form of current legal punishment. The question that is hotly debated is if this form of legal punishment is just and necessary. Hugo Bedau argues that capital punishment is not ethically acceptable. On the other hand, Ernest Van Den Haag argues that this penalty is completely necessary. This paper will summarize both opinions and give two reasons why the death penalty should be abolished, both from a ethical point of view and from a practical perspective.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Texas

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “After all, crime is only a left-handed form of human endeavor,” John Huston (Silver and Ursini 237). Crime has become a part of human life. To prevent it, human has created the punishment system to scare others from sin, and the ultimate payment for a crime is death sentence. Death penalty was and still thought to be the most effective and definitive way of examples for crimes’ consequences. Since 1976, the death penalty was re-instituted in the U.S:…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The key features of the argument on supporting the death penalty developed by Ernest Van Den Haag first focuses on matters of mal-distribution and determining if an individual really deserves it, second the miscarriages of justice, third if the death penalty is a better deterrence than other punishments, fourth the incidental issues that the death penalty promotes, and fifth justice, excess, and degradation. The first argument that Ernest Van Den Haag argues is on the matter of mal-distribution, and determining whether an individual really deserves capital punishment. He expresses his view that mal-distribution being compared between those individuals who are guilty or innocent is undeserved. The acts of capital punishment upon an individual who knowingly commits a crime and is considered guilty in that sense deserves the punishment. However, on the other hand he considers that when mal-distribution is then put upon an innocent life that did not commit the crime but is considered guilty is seen as than unjust.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi Punishment

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    We should not allow one who has murdered to remain a murderer. The ones truly affected are the victims and the ones sentenced to death no one will shed a tear for. Prison is a vacation for most prisoners they are fed three times a day, have a roof over their heads, and are given jobs. To allow them to live with a life sentence is giving them an easy out not the death penalty. By taking their life they will not be given the luxuries to see family, have meals, and live day to day.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is a subject that can be and has been debated for lengthy amounts of time. There are still many countries that perform executions today, but many of these countries differ from the United States greatly. While the death penalty has been used as early as eighteenth century B.C., there is no doubt that there are many factors that make the death penalty a questionable subject in the modern United States. The death penalty should not be utilized in the United States because it is costly, inhumane, and inaccurate.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People live in a society that is surrounded by violent behavior for that reason the justice uses the death penalty to send out a positive message for those who tend to commit capital offence. Capital punishment is not an act we wish to place on a single soul, but it is the best way to keep the killer out of society and prevent any further murders. There is no concrete evidence of either positive or negative effect, but this does not mean it would not help lower the crime rate. People need to understand that the best way to prevent any possible murders in the future is not let the killer walk free. The death penalty allows us to see the seriousness of a crime and the value of life.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics