Cloning In Frankenstein

Improved Essays
Catarina Garcia
Engbrock
English DC
9 March 2018
Mini Research Paper
An example of modern science/technology that I think oversteps moral boundaries and has yielded unwanted consequences is cloning for stem cell research. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein creates life, which could have it’s benefits, but he did not think of the problems and unwanted consequences that could result from it. Although there are benefits to cloning there are also unwanted effects and unnecessary consequences.
The main reason cloning is done is to harvest stem cells for research and for the creation of new tissues and organs. In an article by John Shea titled “What’s Wrong with Human Cloning,” he states that “the Health Department is considering
…show more content…
It may seem like a good idea in the short term but in both situations the long term consequences were not thought through. In the beginning of Frankenstein, Walton, a sailor trying to reach the North Pole, is writing to his sister and says, “One man’s life or death were but a small price to pay for the acquirement of the knowledge which I sought, for the dominion I should acquire and transmit over the elemental foes of our race.”(Shelley pg 25). A life lost was not worth as much as his success in his scientific endeavor, to lose the life of one man was a risk he would not hesitate to take if it meant he would reach his goal. Although there were benefits to Victor creating life and there are benefits to cloning the benefits do not outway the damage that was caused by the monster and the damage that is caused by cloning. Human embryos are being destroyed unnecessarily just like the creature caused Victor unnecessary problems that could have been avoided. Stem cells can be obtained without doing any harm and Victor could have avoided the damage done by the creature if he would have thought of the consequences or if he would have taken responsibility for his mistake instead of abandoning his creation. “Why did you form a monster so hideous that even you turned from me in disgust?”(Shelley 140). The moment Victor saw the creature alive he ran from it, if he would have taken responsibility and taken care of his creation it would not have become the monster that it did. It may not have been unethical when he first had the idea to create life but once he abandoned what he created it became morally wrong. It was wrong for him to bring the creature to life and not take care of it as its

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He failed in his responsibility of enlightening Frankenstein on matters relating to ethics and drawing of the line in such matters. A modern example of such an ethical dilemma is related to cloning where human have undertaken the cloning of animals although there is yet to be an agreement on human cloning. The real overall long-term effects related to cloning have not been understood yet. Science cannot ascertain what should be but just that which can…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a world where everything must be donned “good” or “bad’, one has to ask the obvious question, is the science and experimentation in the novel Frankenstein good or bad? Victor Frankenstein sets a precedent of what not to do when you want to perform a science experiment. For this creature to be constructed out of absolutely nothing, Frankenstein must had to “desire it with an ardor that far exceeded moderation” which is unnecessary (p. 45). When someone wants something that bad, it needs to be planned out and organized, not thrown together with no regard to the safety of others. He wanted it more out of selfishness and didn’t realistically think about it and consider the consequences, thus resulting in a catastrophe.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Graft In Frankenstein

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Science has come a long way since its surge from the Renaissance, a time of discovery and acceptance of new scientific practices. Biology, a science concerning life structures, has made very pronounced advancements. From subduing the black plague with sanitation to restarting hearts shortly after it seizes, it seems that there is no limit to what can be accomplished now in the 21st century. Creation of life has been a debated subject recently. The science and advancements we've made leave us with the question of its possibility.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a human race, we continue to gain scientific knowledge with and without moral restraints. Inventing new cures for diseases and creating new products to help people around the world are helping people and saving lives everyday, but some discoveries are going unnoticed and unchecked and could potentially be violating the code of ethics that nearly every human being is raised with. With all of these great advancements, how far can we take it before it stops being beneficial and starts to violate our moral standards? Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is the tale of resurrecting an inanimate being into a living creature. Frankenstein is told as a cautionary tale to the people living in the time period of the industrial revolution, but also successfully admonishes readers in modern times.…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley appears to be against cloning due to the treatment the creature faces from society, the creatures negative behavior, and how Mary Shelley describes the creature. A clone is a cell, cell product, or organism that is genetically identical to the unit or individual from which it was derived (Dictionary). The term cloning describes a number of different processes that can be used to produce genetically identical copies of a biological entity. The copied material, which has the same genetic makeup as the original, is referred to as a clone. There are three different types of artificial cloning: gene cloning, reproductive cloning and therapeutic cloning.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr Merrick Analysis

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    No. We disagree with Dr. Merrick’s justification. This is because human clone is living things. The human clone would be every bit as much a human being.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mary Shelley provides many social conflicts and valid arguments in her famous book, Frakenstien. This book created an uprising in the discussion of ethics and potential conflicts, and is used as a resource to prove frequent points made in the argument involving these issues. There have been many articles concerning the use of the forbidden science of the altering of genes. Science expresses the actual dangers of Genetic engineering. Biotechnology and Genetic engineering can be very destructive to society; this is proved in the accomplished novel, Frankenstein by Mary Shelley.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Simon Smith stated, “Theories exist about how cloning may lead to a cure for heart attacks, a revolution in cosmetic surgery, organs for organ transplantation, and predictions abound about how cloning technology will save thousands of lives.” Therapeutic cloning will bring medical breakthroughs that we’ve never had before. Many adults aren’t able to have children and cloning will give them another option of having their own child. Also, cloning will be able to save animals from extinction and possibly bring back animals that are extinct.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this world there are positives and there are negatives. For every action there is a reaction. Scientific advancement is necessary in society and has been present for thousands of years. It’s seen everywhere in the world from the first invention of the wheel to the modern-day car. Sadly, sometimes there are some unpredicted consequences like in the book Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, Victor creates a creature that ends up having terrible consequences to his health and life.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Frankenstein created a monster that was intended to improve the life if humanity. Frankenstein wanted to improve how long a person could be alive for. He created a monster, with feelings and emotions, who ends up killing humans he encounters. Victor Frankenstein never intended to create a killer monster. He intended to create an extension of a person’s life.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No ethical man could abandon something who he had just given life to just because of its hideous exterior. We eventually learn in Chapter 11, Page 87, just how difficult life had been for the creature. Without a guide to show him how to properly navigate this complex and unfeeling world, his creation turned bitter. Even today, if you were to release a child out into this harsh and unfeeling world, they would either die or be so hardened by the world that their innocence is lost forever. Because of the creatures abandonment, it turned into the cold-hearted killer that we observed throughout the book.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cloning a human would violate God 's given human dignity by giving his or her life to the interest of others. Children are originally supposed to come from the fruit of a one-flesh love relationship not science (10). Us as human being should learn to accept what we are given. People may say, well God gave us the knowledge to know how to clone, so why would it be against him? What they don 't understand is that God gave us the knowledge to use it in his power not against him.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cloning Persuasive Essay

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tisya Shah I believe that Cloning violates the deepest principles of humanity and nature for many reason. Cloning has a low success rate, the clone won’t identical to the human or animal are the reasons why humans shouldn’t clone and clones can dies earlier than their normal life span. The articles“Cloning Overview” by by Courtney Farrell and “Counterpoint- Human Cloning Treats Human Life as a Commodity” by Sally Griswold talk about the cloning and why it’s good or bad. First, cloning as a low success rate. In the article “Cloning Overview” it talks about cloning not working all the time.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cloning Technology

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Some of the mammals that were cloned had health problems and even reduced their life span. Plus, it is against the will of nature, the clone has no say in being created or its own…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Next, the cons According to, Health Research Funding “there is a possibility of faster aging this can occur because an older cell is often being used to create human clones” (HRFnd). Meaning the clones would be a waste of resources if they age quickly. Another issue would be that there would be a reduced sense of individuality. The clone would be a new life with unique qualities, but there would be a loss in individuality because a clone is simply a twin of someone else. Last issue cloning can cause is, it may reduce the overall value of life.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays