The Milgram Experiment: Social Influences

Improved Essays
Personality traits can be considered as a reasonably constant attribute that triggers individuals to behave in certain manners. Most personality traits naturally vary from occasion to occasion, but would maintain a core consistency which defines the individual’s “true nature”. (Matthews, Deary & Whiteman, 2003) Social influences on the other hand, is the action that was brought about through obeying authority figures such as our parents, police, teachers and politicians and by conforming to social norms. The simplest form of social influence in our lives comes from the roles we try to fulfil every day. This conformity of roles, influenced by various social agents can be performed regardless of self-perception or personal code of conducts. …show more content…
The experiment was exercised to measure the compliance of participants in obeying an authority figure who instructed them to execute acts that conflicted with their personal conscience. Milgram drew idea for the project of his experiment from the Nazis, who shows exemplary of the Milgram effect. (Boundless, 2016)
Stanley Milgram’s experiment on Obedience illustrates people's reluctance to confront those who abuse their power because due to the pressure of the authority. It was also observed that the subjects obey because they were allowed to allocate their responsibility, guilt and the consequences of their actions even though they are violating their own values. By obeying, the subjects are conforming to the social pressures and avoid the negative consequences of defying. (SSI,
…show more content…
Gang fights are a tactic of protesting by a group of members collectively with orders from a figure of authority. These adolescents partake in obedience through engaging themselves around social hierarchy, their gang leaders. These gang members partake in fights even if they oppose to the idea and acts. They obey their leaders and provide themselves reasons to avoid accountability by using their leaders’ orders as sufficient justification for their

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Milligram’s experiment was based on his interest in researching who and how would someone obey authority figures. He was driven by the thought that maybe there is something about human nature that led people to obey. Having studied previously both Milgram and Zimbardo’s obedience studies, it was easier for me to analyze and apply it to the purpose of the book. The authors point out that although general results are important, there was not much thought put into the difference among the individuals in the experiments. Milgram focused on the 65% of subjects who obeyed the authority, but was less interested on why the 35% of the subjects…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the articles “Just Do What the Pilot Tells You” and “Review of Stanly Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience,” authors Theodore Dalrymple and Diana Baumrind describe the aspects of the Stanley Milgram experiment, while they both partake different topics to discuss. Dalrymple, a British physician, claims that there is a difference between blind obedience and blind disobedience, and there should be a healthy balance between the two (Dalrymple 119). However, Baumrind believes that the subjects should have been treated in a more enhanced way; therefore, claiming that the experiment unsuitably took advantage of the inherent trust and obedience given by the subject when volunteering to participate (Baumrind 89). These two articles are relevant to…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a social experiment conducted by Solomon Asch of 1951, Asch studied the impact of how social pressure from the majority can affect a person to conform (McLeod). The experiment consisted of one participant in a group of actors and all were asked to match the test line to a line most similar. In revealing their answers, the participant was asked to answer last out of the group while the actors all purposely answered incorrectly. With over 12 trials of the experiment, nearly 75% of the participants conformed to answering the question incorrectly at least once. This trend of conformity is also seen in today’s social influence.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Further analysis will demonstrate the ways in which conforming to the conventions of society can have damaging effects by limiting the individual thoughts of people and their happiness. Society’s behavior is guided by a powerful set of unwritten rules. Those that act outside of the rules receive ridicule, criticism, or rejection. The main driving force which draws people to conform is their desire to feel accepted. In order to feel accepted, people often conform however, “When you adopt the standards and values of someone else, you surrender your own integrity [and] become, to the extent of your surrender, less of a human being”- Eleanor Roosevelt.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The experiment in “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram, Yale psychologist, has triggered many responses to the question of an individual’s willingness to obey and the credibility of the experiment he performed. Ian Parker, a regular writer for the New Yorker and common voice in other political/scientific compositions, has come to the table with his opinion and outside sources to discuss the facts of Milgram’s experiment and its consequences in his essay, “Obedience.” Milgram claims through his experiment on obedience we can logically determine an idea of the thought processes of the Nazis (Milgriam 89). This experiment arrived at the conclusion that people are surprisingly obedient to a legitimate authority figure even when the orders…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram and “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience” written by Diana Baumrind are both intriguing articles about Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience. Diana Baumrind believes that Stanley Milgram failed at his experiences on obedience rather than succeeded. Stanley Milgram believed that he succeeded on his experiments if an authority figure tells the test subject to do something then the test subject will. “Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that forced participants either to violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands” (Milgram 77). While both authors address experiments on obedience, Stanley Milgram approaches…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on Milgram’s experiment he uncovered that “For many people, obedience is a deeply ingrained behavior tendency, indeed a potent impulse overriding training in ethics, sympathy, and moral conduct” (691). Most Germans carried out the…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1962, Stanley Milgram surprised the world with his study on obedience. To test his theory he invented an electronic box that would become a window into human cruelty. In ascending order, a row of buttons marked the amount of voltage one person would inflict upon another. Milgram’s original motive for the experiment was to understand the unthinkable: How could the German people permit the extermination of the Jews? Stanley Milgram wanted to understand the necessary conditions in which a person would obey an authority who commanded actions that went against conscience.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article "The Perils of Obedience” Stanley Milgram describes obedience as a basic element in the structure of social life and the effects it has on all communal living(Milgram 693). What if one is asked to be obedient to something that doesn’t aline with their personal morals? Milgram wanted to run an experiment to find this out. He simply wanted to know if the Nazis were acting out in pure evil or just simply following direct orders by a person who, they thought, was placed in a position of authority. In order to do this, he sets out to test how a normal person reacts when given violent orders by a person, who they believe are in a place of authority.…

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s social experiment was an experiment in which laypeople (all white and male) were asked to deliver shocks to actors at the instruction of a scientist. The actor would beg the participant to stop delivering shocks, but the scientist would continue to insist that they continue, relieving them of responsibility if the actor “died,” which it was heavily implied they would. The significant majority delivered what would have been a killing shock, to the surprise of many of the scientists working on it. It was found that a lot of humanity (or, at least, white males) had the capacity for murder if instructed to by the right people; there was a clear blind trust for authority figures. On July 17th, 2014, Eric Garner died from a cop’s…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiment on obedience to authority is one of the best known studies in social psychology. It was repeated several times in different variations. These replications extended our knowledge about the phenomenon of complying to authorities’ orders. One of them was the experiment conducted by Hofling et al. This essay will outline the similarities and differences between these two studies.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some cause great suffering while others appear very helpful and valuable. Whichever group it is, the ultimate end is in the leader's discretion. The psychological method normative social influence is a type of social influence leading to conformity. It is defined in social psychology as the influence of other people…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The test proved that seemingly normal people are likely to follow orders given by a person of authority even to the extent of killing another because obedience to authority is ingrained in us all from the way we are brought up. This experiment forced participant to either violate their conscience by obeying immoral demands or not. Milgram’s experiment recruited forty males to take part in the study of “learning” with a total of six hundred thirty-six participants in eighteen separate tests. The participants actually believed they were shocking a real person unaware that the learner was actually acting like being shocked.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Comparative Analysis of Ross and Nisbett’s “The Power of Situations” and Fromm’s “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem” Introduction Ross and Nisbett disagree with Fromm about the causes for obedience or disobedience to authority. It states in the introduction to “The Power of Situations”: “Erich Fromm conceives of obedience and disobedience as products of one’s character or of one’s moral choices” (627). This is suggesting that Fromm believes a person will obey or disobey based on their personality traits. He states: “All martyrs of religious faiths, of freedom, and of science have had to disobey those who wanted to muzzle them in order to obey their own consciences, the laws of humanity, and of reason” (623). People…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays