The Charlemagne's Feudal System

Improved Essays
When the Romans fell, all of Western Europe had no countries under any particular rule. Many tribes were fighting over the control of territories, but there were no forms governments or any type of national armies. The Frankish tribes seized control over large amounts of territories. The Frankish king, Charlemagne controlled and ruled a large part of Europe. Having controlled so much land, Charlemagne instituted a feudal system of government. In feudalism, the land was ruled by one power known as a king. The king will usually grant what is known as a fief or portions of land to nobles or lords or barons in exchange for their loyalty, protection and their services. The king could and would also give fiefs to knights for their military service. …show more content…
(1) Feudalism has allowed massive territories to be controlled and was normally controlled or governed when in the absence of a central government. Kings or lords had Knights raise armies to defend their lands to serve the current king in whatever way was needed. One major drawback to ¬this feudal system was that the¬ nobles were powerful because of their control over the armies. In fact, nobles often waged many wars amongst themselves over territories rather than war enemies. Feudalism offered a different new way for a person to grow and raise himself within society by going into military service or being in the knighthood. Knights have been known to have held a higher standard when compared to peasants, but they were never considered royalty like the lords. Knighthood was not usually something that can be easily obtained it was to be earned. It was normally to have the sons of lords to personally advance themselves through honor and hard work. Knights earned wealth through service under their lord or by the land in which they owned. The path to knighthood start usually when a boy was very young, official

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Most of histories notable stories are characterized by some great conflict or crisis. The books “The Two Lives of Charlemagne” by Einhart/Notker, “The Black Death” by John Aberth and “The Return of Martin Guerre” by Natalie Zemon-Davis are all historical accounts with vastly disparate perspectives but which are unified by a broad theme of overcoming (or attempting to overcome) hardships or trials. Given the uniqueness of each trial the attempts made at resolving the issues of the times are equally unique. “The Two Lives of Charlemagne” paints two pictures of King Charles the first king of the Franks, and his lifetime of trial and conquest. King Charles didn’t have just one characterizing trial but a life of near constant conflict, whether…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Frankish kingdom grew substantially, along with the church, during the reign of Charlemagne. As new territories were conquered they were they were Christianized; some brutally, such as the Saxons, Muslims were driven beyond the Pyrenees, and the Avars were practically annihilated. The Church looked to Charlemagne for protection, such as from the Lombards. Charlemagne wanted a center of control, however his territories were about the size of the European Union of today. This made is difficult to control.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Can you imagine living in a world where knights protected lords in exchange for land? Well, when the Franks invented feudalism (OI), that’s what happened. Knights would protect lords or kings, and then the kings would give the knights land. Peasants would work on the land and take care of everything while the knights were protecting the land. As you can see, feudalism influenced the social, economic, and political lives of the people who lived then.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Feudalism” as a term has been controversial since its conception. Its origin is the German “feudalismus,” and was first used in the English language in its current meaning in the 17th and 18th centuries. There is difficulty defining this term because of its inherently large scope; a feudal system is one in which there may be a social, economic, or political system of seigniorial landownership and general dues of the peasantry. This naturally describes many societies throughout history, and so, many historians would argue that to effectively narrow the subject and thus reasonably study the idea of a feudal structure, one must focus on specific criteria. Barendse would agree with this sentiment, as he states in his article, “The Feudal Mutation,”…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Written circa 826, Einhard’s Life of Charlemagne provides historians with rare insight into Emperor Charlemagne’s inner circle and intimate details of his life. Intended to commemorate Charlemagne’s character and achievements, Einhard’s document also delves into the nature of Charlemagne’s empire, examining which political strategies helped or hindered the Frankish Empire’s formation. In regards to the nature and scope of Charlemagne’s empire, Einhard draws particular attention to the ways in which the Frankish Empire was the continuation and embodiment of old, Roman prestige. However, Einhard ultimately draws attention away from traditional associations of empire and imperialism, instead focusing on a very specific– and often overlooked–…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Notker and Einhard both wrote accounts about Charlemagne, titled "The Life of Charlemagne. " They both respected him as a Christian and leader of the Franks, however they take an alternate point of view on him. Einhard actually knew Charlemagne, and displays him as a three-dimensional, reasonable individual, with numerous achievements a few failings. Notker considers him to be a legend that he took in of from his older folks, overwhelming and larger than life. Einhard laid out his life story logically,as a kind of historical record of Charles’ life, while Notker put together more of a collection of anecdotes.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Feudalism Dbq

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Back in the times of medieval Europe and early Japan the feudal system played a very important role. However, feudalism did not have the same structure in these societies. Life during these times was very different to how life is now. Everyone owed respect to another person. It is almost like the major corporate hierarchies in today’s world, but that was how life was all day every day.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two lives of Charlemagne is a book that has the writings of two people that wrote about the life of Charlemagne. The first person was a man named Einhard who wrote a biography of Charlemagne’s life. The second was Notker the Stammerer who wrote about the deeds of Charlemagne. The writings from Einhard and Notker combine to make the book Two lives of Charlemagne. The text will focus on six ideals from the text.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There was once a beloved ruler, who encouraged schools and knowledge for everyone, while conquering territory and governing the city to the best of his ability. Charlemagne, also known as Charles the Great, was a widely known emperor who ruled most of Western Europe from 768 to 814. His father, Pepin the Short, was Mayor of the Palace to king, who ruled over the Frankish kingdom for fifteen years until his death in October 768 AD. When his father died, the Franks placed the two brothers, Charlemagne and Carloman, to take over their father’s place; however, in 771 AD, Carloman died of disease and Charlemagne was immediately appointed as the sole ruler of the Franks. Consequently, Charlemagne impressed everyone with his military intelligence,…

    • 1368 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles the Great, also known as Charlemagne, ruled between the years of 768 and 814 CE. Einhard, a friend of Charlemagne, considers him the greatest king of the middle ages. Still, what characteristics does Einhard consider great, and how are those traits manifested in Charlemagne? Using Einhard’s work, The Life of Charlemagne, we can gleam insight into what made Charlemagne so great, as well as what is the mark of a great medieval king. Einhard, documents how Charlemagne was a great general, a friend of The Church, and a supporter of education.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Feudalism, or the feudal system, was a social and political system that existed during the Middle Ages (Nardo 14). It was based off of bonds of loyalty between people,…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The document reinforces Charlemagne’s powerful, effective, respected status as a Christian warrior by testifying and listing the several victories Charlemagne won. For example, the document includes accounts of his efficient conquest and defeat of the Bretons, the Barbarians, the Welatabians, the Sorabians, the Abodriti, the Bohemians, and his victory in the Saxon War, Bohemian and Linonian wars, and Danes. The multiple forces that tried to rebel, to reject, or to uprise against Charles’ dominion were subdued into obedience/submission using hostages and embassies. For example, in Charles’ defeat of Duke Tassilo in the Bavarian war, Tassilo was forced to surrender himself to Charles, “give him the hostages he demanded, [including his own son Theodo], and promised by oath not to give ear to anyone who should [rebel against Charles’ allegiance].” Additionally, the document even includes relics of people who willingly surrendered to Charlemagne’s rule, such as some barbarous German tribes between the Rhine and the Vistula.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Feudalism can be seen as quite similar to Clientage. This system was used in ancient Rome. Clientage is where a leader promises goods or money for political support. Feudalism is where a leader offers land in exchange for protection. Although it may be hard to see, knights have influenced so much more than they are given credit…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Feudalism, England’s alternative to a government during the Middle Ages, played a significant role in the age of war and monarchs, and in some ways continues to have a role in today’s government. The workings of feudalism are simple. A king, or lord, gives land, also known as fiefs, ownership to nobles, also known as vassals, and in return for the king’s overall protection, the vassals would be responsible for providing their support and defense in the form of knights. In reciprocation for their service, knights were given smaller sized fiefs, this was known as subinfeudation. The peasants, or serfs, would do all upkeep of the land.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlemagne Research Paper

    • 2591 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Introduction: Charlemagne was the King of the Franks from 768 and Emperor of the Romans from 800 until his death in 814. He expanded his kingdom to an empire, uniting most of west Europe. The Carolingian Renaissance is associated with his reign, a time when art and culture was revived through the Catholic Church, which encouraged a common European identity. Chapter 1 who is Charlemagne?…

    • 2591 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays