Quasi Study Arbitrarily

There are two different groups of participants in the study who were chosen for the study arbitrarily. The goal of the study was to find the best way to help students learn better. The researcher chose to use quizzes that were given on a weekly basis. Since the quizzes are only a very small part of the students ' final grade, it is more logical to conclude that the investigator would use the exams that were given to the students as a better measure of student learning than their marks on the weekly quizzes. With this supposition used in the research, it is clear that the best plan of quasi study would be the nonequivalent control group post-test. It is possible that using the exams instead of the weekly quizzes. It is possible that using the exams instead of the weekly quizzes to measure student learning that layout of the study could be altered. Therefore, it seems that the best approach …show more content…
Even though a Quasi-experimental design does have certain weakness for the investigator, this form of research possesses advantages as well that help researchers accomplish their research goals. Ellis & Leavy (2011) stated that quasi-experiments in research are employed more than other quantitative designs. 3. As long as every member of the study is placed into groups without any criteria and are arbitrarily attached to the study, it can be said, with all probability, from the start of the study, that all the groupings are predominantly the same (Trochim & Donnelly, 2008). Yet, should those participating in a study be selected from those not associated with the study, equality will not be achieved. There will always be confounds that will make 100 % probability impossible and render it difficult to attain the goal of equity by the completion of the