The 4th Amendment: The Components Of The Fourth Amendment

Improved Essays
One of the most commonly known amendments are those that are considered part of the Bill of Rights. However, one of the most important amendment that every citizen should know is the Fourth Amendment. This Amendment is broken in three parts that imply that people should have the right to be secure in and of their property, no warrants should be issued without any unreasonable cause and that if there is a warrant, then they should specify the place and people of search. Many citizens do not completely understand this amendment to the extent to exercise this right.
When this nation was being establish there were many controversies about law enforcement coming into the citizens’ home to search for property of the owner or for the owner itself with an unreasonable cause. This is the reason why this part of the amendment was created, to protect the
…show more content…
First, a citizen should make sure that the address and name that appears on the warrant in accurate to that domicile. If is not, then no one should enter the house for any means. Second, a citizen should check to see if it is sign by a judge in the state in which that person resides. More importantly, the citizen should read about the specifications that indicates what and where the officers can search. No one can look through a part of a house if it is not specify on the warrant. For example, if the warrant only states that the officers can only look through your roommate’s property, then they cannot look through your property by any means. They will need to stay only on your roommate’s side of the dorm. Also, if the warrant specifies that only John Smith should be arrested then the officers have no right to arrest anyone that is under the same roof without a probable cause. If they suspect that others in the same room are accomplices or suspects, they will need to have another warrant to have the right to arrest anyone else inside that

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Government introduces you to a precedent that has to do with DLK’s case because in this case they intended for their info to be private, but the government used something that goes above the five senses so you would need a warrant to use it. This is important because in DLK’s case he intended for his info to be private, but since the government used a thermal imager without a warrant just like the bug in the Katz case, they found out he was growing marijuana in his home. No one else would want someone else to find out something that they are doing if it is private. While some may argue that the government can do that without a warrant if they are suspicious, no one would want their private info to be found or heard by the government. In conclusion, the Government should not invade your privacy unless given a warrant to do…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilson Vs Arkansas

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Issue- Whether it was reasonable under the 4th amendment for the officers to enter a home without a warrant. Rule- Knock and Announce rule law enforcement has to knock and announce that they are police and wait a reasonable amount of time, usually seconds, before entering place before they search. (Wilson v Arkansas)…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fourth Amendment Warrants

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages

    As followed, searches incident to arrest do not require a warrant if the search is in radius of the suspect. The officer may search the surrounding area for illegal contraband or weapons. Ultimately, to protect the officers around as well as to collect valuable…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Another part good for the Fourth Amendment is that the authorities may not take anything without a good reason. At the time many people thought that people were listening to their phone calls, and taking information from the phone calls. President Obama has openly said that no one Is listening to you’re phone calls. Another major point is a federal judge ruling, that said that the NSA’S surveillance program is illegal. This gives the citizens more reassurance that no one is taking anything or in this case private information from them.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, searching the privacy of the home would be unconstitutional under due process of law and the fourth amendment. The marijuana plants being in plain sight do not constitute a search of property within the home, just as it being unlawful does not merit enough evidence to request a search warrant within the premises under probable cause. With only a personal belief that the owners are dealing or doing drugs, there is no substantial evidence to request a warrant either. In addition, we do not have probable cause to enter the premises unless asked to enter by the owners while responding to the premises due to a noise ordinance violation. Even with permission to enter, we do not have a warrant to search the premises.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They still needed to get a warrant, or her permission, to even take the bomb from out of her house. The 1st amendment is being violated in this scenario; for the 1st amendment states that; “U.S. citizens have freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition.”…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This paper reflects upon the establishment of the Fourth Amendment, added as part of the Bill of Rights on December 15, 1791. From the colonial era to the establishment of the United States Constitution in September 17, 1787, Philadelphia. The implementation of the United States Supreme Court in 1789; under the Judiciary Act of 1789. The many challenges surrounding the notion that “Every man 's home is his castle” The Constitution of the United States: Fourth Amendment Rights…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dk Dbq Analysis

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since the search was done from outside of the home, it did not reveal any of the activities inside of this house. (Doc. C) According to Justice John Paul Stevens, “The officers’ conduct did not amount to a search and was perfectly reasonable…”. The imager did not go through the walls of the home, therefore it was not a search and did not require a warrant. (Doc. F)…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 4th amendment prohibits unreasonable search and seizure of property. The 13th amendment abolished slavery. These three amendments have helped to shape America and the way that government runs the country. The 8th amendment prohibits the federal government from imposing…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment is “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The goal of this amendment is to protect people’s privacy. The Fourth Amendment protects the people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. However, the fourth amendment is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Neubauer & Fradella, 2015) The four amendments of the Bill of Right that deal with criminal procedure protect citizens. The Fourth Amendment states that the law enforcement cannot arrest a citizen or search his or her property unless there is probable cause. The Fifth Amendment…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Whether a specific category of search is reflected as reasonable in the judgements of the law, is ascertained by examination two principal interests: Intrusion on an individual's Fourth Amendment Right Legitimate government interests, such as public…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The statement, “The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places,” is one of the most controversial statements in Criminal Procedure. The amendment’s purpose is to secure individuals’ rights to privacy within their houses, papers, and defends them against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, to what extent does the law preserve a person’s privacy? The Law of Search and Seizure and the Search Warrant, give the government strict to stipulations as to how they are able to rightfully obtain information that is presumed to be private. Although Searches, Seizures and Warrants seem to have simple guidelines, they are each intricate categories.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He seeks authorization to search the suspect 's home and any evidence which would connect the suspect to the scheme. The officers walk into the home, and search every inch of the house, and find bundles of cocaine in the bathtub. The law enforcement agent seizes the drugs because they are now in plain view of his search. He was searching for paperwork in relation to a financial scheme the officer now arrest the book the suspect for possession of an illegal substance, with intent to sell, which is a completely unrelated crime. In this example you see that, a warrant stating exactly what they are looking for is needed so that law enforcement agents can 't walk into a residence and search in hopes of finding something illegal regardless to if it 's connected to a crime or not.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays