Territorial Issues And Compromises During The Civil War

Improved Essays
Territorial Issues and Compromises On April 12, 1861 the legendary American Civil War broke out. This was a war that would decide the fate of the United States of America. A major problem within the government back then was deciding on whether or not the government had power to outlaw slavery in unmarked U.S. territories. As more territory was acquired, the greater the tension grew between the free and slave states. Luckily, the Civil War was delayed due to various settlements between political parties regarding slavery- such as the Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was proposed by Representative Henry Clay from Kentucky. Clay came up with this after Missouri demanded to become a state, which would have upset the existing balance among free and slave states. The compromise resulted in Missouri admitted as a slave state and Maine carved out of Massachusetts as a free state. Before this conciliation, sectionalism seemed to be on an increasing rise in popularity. This compromise delayed the Civil War by several decades. …show more content…
Henry Clay came up with the Compromise of 1850, and it was passed with the help of Senator Stephen Douglas. This compromise allowed Utah to become either a free or slave state depending on popular sovereignty, banned slave markets from Washington D.C., and allowed the Tougher Fugitive Slave Act to pass. It was a considerably even win for all, since both the northerners and southerners got a piece of what they wanted. The dispute over slavery in new territories was settled yet again for that time

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Many political issues had detrimental effects that caused the Civil War. One of those issues being the Missouri Compromise, which took place in 1820. The reasoning behind the Missouri compromise was due to the South feeling that since the North had gained Maine, as a free state, that the political power would be much stronger than it would be in the South. Therefore, Missouri was to become a slave state, which then also created the cutoff line for free and slave states. The Missouri compromise was not a problem that was solved quickly, the entire process took about two years to solve.…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, many disputes were presented when solving an issue. There were many arguments over the Louisiana purchase and the expansion of slavery in the new territories. The different views of a strict constructionist and a loose constructionist made the Louisiana purchase very difficult for Thomas Jefferson. Likewise, the expansion of slavery into the new territories was a very challenging decision between the Abolitionists and the South. A difference in opinion caused different arguments for expanding slavery and the Louisiana purchase.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry Clay, a planter and senate representative from Kentucky known as “The Great Pacificator”, organized politicians to determine the best way to divide the new land. Clay drafted the Missouri Compromise, which determined that any state below the 36” 30’ parallel would be a slave state and any state above the demarcation would be free states. The Missouri Compromise functioned for about thirty years until 1848 when land acquired as a result of the Mexican War raised new sectional tensions (PN 240). In 1850, Clay…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an era where slavery was viewed as a profitable and reputable source of wealth, income, power, and an economic driving force, divisions amongst opinions added fuel to the flame for an unavoidable conflict to ignite. The Missouri Compromise came about for views, even within a time with which like-mindedness was prized and raised to the highest of glories on a pedestal, vastly varied on the issue of slavery and its seemingly rather loosely tied boundaries. With two opposing sides, the North for the removal of slavery and the South in favor of its continued existence -- territorial issues were heavy on the mind. Though often revered as being a more verbal form of compromise that laid out specific boundaries within the states, or two states…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise was created by Congress in 1819 in order to solve the sectional and political rivalries between the Northern and Southern states. Maine was added as a free state in the North and Missouri was added as a slave state in the South. As a result of this Compromise, there were 22 states in America, divided equally between the two regions. Congress’s intentions was that by each region having 11 states, there would be equal representation in the Senate from the North and South. By dividing the North and South, this made political relations even worse because it completely separated the country.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, when the Dred Scott case declared them unconstitutional, tensions between the North and the South exploded, resulting in a full-blown Civil War once Abraham Lincoln was elected president. Between 1820 and 1854, Congress enacted three compromises to settle the disputes over slavery. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 proposed to regulate slavery in the western territories by clearly defining free and slave territories. In order to maintain a balance of power in the Senate between slave and free states, the act prohibited slavery in new states of the Louisiana Purchase territory North of the 36 30 parallel. It also admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free one.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The years following 1850 proved to be a time of political turmoil in the United States. With slavery still being utilized in the South, it seemed that the Northern and Southern politicians would always be at odds. This opposition would always exist between the North and South so long as slavery existed. During the period preceding the Compromise of 1850 politicians were able to formulate compromises that barely appeased both sides. Eventually there was nothing else to do to satisfy both sides of the country.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Missouri Compromise in 1820 basically had an equal amount of free and slave states. It made sense to have a compromise that balanced every state. However, the Compromise of 1850 threw off the first compromise because California would become a state. If California were to become a state there would not be an equal amount of free and slave states. Interestingly, laws were established, for example, "a stringent new law would allow southerners to reclaim runaway slaves... and the status of slavery in the remaining territories acquired from Mexico would be left to the decision of the local white inhabitants" (478).…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For the majority of American History leading up to the Civil War, civilians had been divided over the issue of slavery and politics. The nation had a long history of compromise that seemed necessary to keep the nation unified. Most of these compromises avoided the issue of slavery, as politicians and “great compromisers” like Henry Clay aimed to prevent the inevitable split between the North and South. There was a turning point, however, in the North and South, when compromise was no longer an option. Although the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 was the immediate and final trigger for southern secession, other attributes including the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Bleeding Kansas, and the Dred Scott decision of 1857 drove the South further towards…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the United States government took many steps to try and prevent sectionalism and tensions because of territorial expansion, the tensions between the North and the South In 1819 Missouri had a big enough population to be admitted into the union. However Missouri requested to be admitted as a slave state which would disrupt the balance in representation in the Senate. Congress enacted the Missouri Compromise which would admit Missouri as a slave state, admit Maine as a free state as well as outlawing slavery north of 36°30. This was criticized by many southerners because it established the principle that Congress could make laws regarding slavery; northerners, on the other hand, condemned it for acquiescing in the expansion of slavery. Thus resolving the crisis it did not help settle conflicts and eventually Missouri was repealed by the Kansas Nebraska Act.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 brought Missouri into America as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Everything above the Louisiana Purchase Boundary line, with the exception of Missouri, banned slavery. This action resulted in maintaining an equal representation for both the North and the South in the Senate. Following this, the Compromise of 1850 allowed California to be admitted as a free state, however popular sovereignty would be used in the land of the Mexican Cession. This caused controversy within the states.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, I do not feel that the Compromise should have ever been approved because it did not fix the problem, nor did it prevent a war, it simply prolonged the issues that would force the war between the two in the years to come. Not to mention the Compromise allowed slavery to continue, any negotiation that allows for the act of slavery to exist, is doomed. The fact is that both sides felt they had given up too much and not received enough in return. There were also many issues that led to the failure of the Compromise of 1850 such as, slavery and economics but it was primarily about states right, specifically the right to practice slavery. It is my opinion, that the American Civil War was unavoidable.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1820, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise. This compromise agreed to admit Missouri as a slave state and then admit Maine as a free state to keep the balance of free and slave states in the country. It also created the 36’ 30° line. The 36’ 30° line was an imaginary line on the southern border of Missouri above which it was agreed new states could not hold slaves. Many in the south saw this as an act in support of the abolition of slavery, which helped to increase tensions between the north and south over the issue of slavery (Missouri n.d.).…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secession Essay

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although the Northern states and the Southern states had their differences in their beliefs, on profuse occasions—specifically on slavery—compromises had squelch down the bad blood between them. However, in 1789, even after the Constitution was adopted by all of the States to amalgamate as a nation, for more than thirty years, the temporarily ceased frictions between the North and South went to and fro once more. Thus, by 1861, these opposing ideals between the disputants were so prodigious that the compromises do not seem enticing to either antithetical stance. Henceforth, this led to the secession of the Southern states, much to the Northern states’ disgust and eventually to the Civil War.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays