In my policy speech, I wrote about teen unemployment and how it is so low. I included information on why teen unemployment is low, and my solutions for it. As for which type of argument that I uses happens to be Argument1. Argument1 refers to the claims that people make. My claim was the low rate of teen unemployment. Also, in Argument1 you have to find and explain solutions for the problems that are being claimed. My solution to the problem of teen unemployment was quite simple. These solutions involved creating more career centers in highschool and jobs such as fast food or retail hire ages 16-24 years old. With Argument1 it allows us to have an intense desire to improve our world, and this is exactly what I wanted to achieve with my speech.
…show more content…
Deductive Arguments are basically are theories or principles believed to be honest claims by individuals. As using Deductive Arguments, the argument that I used was Arguments from Casual Generalization. Arguments from Casual Generalization is the direct counterpart of causal correlation. The way I used this argument was identifying the connection between the examples and research that I found. Also, I identified the connection between teens and the employers. As I did this, I acknowledged the fact that my audience all have a different experience with teen unemployment. Even Though, I knew this I still decided to identify the connection between teens and employers or examples and research with my audience whether they had the same experience or not. The reason for this is because even if they couldn 't find a connection between themselves and teen unemployment, they might know someone that have had the experience. By them knowing someone they were able to add a connection and gave themselves a better understanding of the topic of my speech.
In conclusion, I would like to take out the time to identify the arguments that I used and sum up this portion of my paper. The arguments that I used was Argument1, Argument2, Argument by Example, Argument by Analogy and lastly, Arguments from Casual Generalization. The reason that I used all these arguments were to make the connection to audience and my speech topic of teen unemployment more relatable. By using these arguments I believe that achieved just that. I felt that my audience were able to connect to my topic and left knowing a bit more on teen unemployment and how it is affecting our nation
Deductive Arguments are basically are theories or principles believed to be honest claims by individuals. As using Deductive Arguments, the argument that I used was Arguments from Casual Generalization. Arguments from Casual Generalization is the direct counterpart of causal correlation. The way I used this argument was identifying the connection between the examples and research that I found. Also, I identified the connection between teens and the employers. As I did this, I acknowledged the fact that my audience all have a different experience with teen unemployment. Even Though, I knew this I still decided to identify the connection between teens and employers or examples and research with my audience whether they had the same experience or not. The reason for this is because even if they couldn 't find a connection between themselves and teen unemployment, they might know someone that have had the experience. By them knowing someone they were able to add a connection and gave themselves a better understanding of the topic of my speech.
In conclusion, I would like to take out the time to identify the arguments that I used and sum up this portion of my paper. The arguments that I used was Argument1, Argument2, Argument by Example, Argument by Analogy and lastly, Arguments from Casual Generalization. The reason that I used all these arguments were to make the connection to audience and my speech topic of teen unemployment more relatable. By using these arguments I believe that achieved just that. I felt that my audience were able to connect to my topic and left knowing a bit more on teen unemployment and how it is affecting our nation