Walker Vs Texas Division Essay

Improved Essays
Supreme Court cases have played a requisite role in modifying and defining certain amendments in the constitution. The decision of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans has displayed a monumental impact on American society, both at the time of the decision and in the latter future. Though the first amendment prohibits the restriction of speech and press, in this particular case the government was entitled to restrict those rights. The court argued that Texas specialty license plate designs constitute government speech, and thus Texas was entitled to refuse to issue plates featuring SCV’s proposed design. The court 's decision has stimulated great reaction in our nation causing dispute over whether the government passes off private speech as government speech.
In the years leading up to the Walker v. Texas Division, SCV case the core source of sectional tension and controversy among U. S.
…show more content…
The resolution reached by the courts included both positive and negative outcomes. The court 's decision to eliminate the confederate flag, because of what it symbolizes, is a positive outcome proving that our nation has come a long way from slavery. However, others viewed the decision as limiting their rights to free and private speech, which demonstrated to be a negative aspect of the ruling. Though the government no longer tolerates racially offensive symbols and speech, this negative side effect limits the ability for individuals to express their feelings on contentious issues. There is a negative aspect to every ruling, and the court tried its best to satisfy the public. The court’s decision corresponded with the public 's reaction. Since the public found the design to be offensive, the government has agreed to ban the confederate flag as an option to their list of license

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The paper ends the discussion on the significant changes that occurred following the Supreme Court decision, both for himself, UT, and future Texas…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Considering the ruling of Texas vs. Johnson, I think the court would rule against the banning of the Confederate flag. However times change and the court can change its mind. This ruling could also be applied to the controversy arising on many college campuses discussed in The Week we responded to last week. College students have responded to opinions stated by teachers or administrators with vigor taking their ‘first amendment rights’ to the next level. The professors and administrators are entitled to the opinions they presented.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Recently the United States have been subject to racial discrimination and the controversy surrounding the topic has resulted in multiple tragedies in our society. It can be considerably seen that the racial discrimination has created an undergoing turmoil for various hate crimes, police brutality and overall resurfacing discrimination throughout the country. The most recent subject at hand in which is being discussed is the banning of the Confederate flag. Should the confederate flag be banned? Why or Why not?…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States is known to have the freedom of speech under the Bill of Rights, however, certain speeches could be restricted. The court case Schenck v. United States has classified how the first amendment could be restricted from an individual if it causes a “clear and present danger”. The court ruled that Schenck’s words and expression are not protected under the first amendment as he attempted to disturb military efforts during wartime. The impact of Schenck v. United States was negatively substantial in the United States as it describes that free speech does not have unlimited authority when it comes to causing a clear and present danger to society. Furthermore, the case has negatively affected other court cases with similar aspects…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dred Scott Decision

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    DRED SCOTT V. SANFORD: THE ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS Jay Barber 25938654 HIUS-221 November 16, 2017 As seminal decision rendered by the United States Supreme Court, Dred Scott v. Sanford brought the issues of racism and slavery to the forefront of American political culture during the nineteenth century. It has also been considered by legal and political scholars to be a “ghastly error”, the “product of an overly ideological and reactionary judge”, and a cause of the Civil War. Many abolitionists and Northerners declared the Supreme Court’s decision to be illegitimate while others demanded obedience to the Court’s decision and labeled disobedience as rebellion, treason, and unconstitutional.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard about the slave sued his owner’s widow for his freedom? Well, the decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford is considered to be one of the most influential in legal history because the Supreme Court decided that the slaves are not defined as citizens of the United States, thus influencing their ability to sue in federal courts and this case eventually raised questions about slavery which led to the civil war. Dred Scott was a man who was once an African-American slave. He was sold in Missouri as a slave to an army surgeon, Dr. John Emerson, they later moved and lived in free states; Illinois and Wisconsin. Then, they moved back to Missouri, which is a slave state, but John Emerson passed away in 1846, so it is time he should become free.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Confederate Flag

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “American public opinion on the confederate flag remains about where it was 15 years ago, with most describing the flag as a symbol of Southern Pride more than one of racism.” (Agiesta 1) The confederate flag will always be a part of the history in the United States. It has been integrated in the culture for well over a hundred years, and now that all of a sudden a shooting happened everyone wants to blame a flag and remove it based on prejudice or racism. The flag is a symbol of patriots who were trying to protect a country and make sure it remained as the founders of the country intended it to.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Controversy of the Confederate Flag Does it represent slavery and oppression, or is it simply just a symbol of some people’s heritage? This is a wide controversy many people are talking about even today about the Confederate Flag. Society is trying to decide if it is disrespectful or not. Many people say it is disrespectful because the flag was used in times of slavery, whereas the other side believes the flag is just a part of their heritage. The Confederate Flag should not be removed from history and should be able to be flown without fear of people feeling that you are racist for flying it.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Taking down the Confederate flag on government grounds isn’t the only issue surrounding the flag but also the banning of the flag in public spaces. Schools are battling the display of the flag on vehicles and articles of clothing. In the Virginia high school of Christiansburg more than 20 students were suspended after they refused to remove cloths that had the Confederate flag on it. There suspension came shortly after a new district policy banning any Confederate symbol from the school, rear windows of vehicles and on mini flagpoles on trucks in the parking lot. The frustrated students held a rally with their supporters outside the school asking them to repeal the new policy, saying that they wore the cloths not out of hate but as the marginalized group that believes the flag is Southern history.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argument Against Welfare Testing

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited

    In The University Of Pennsylvania Journal Of Constitutional Law, Celia Goetzl agrees: “Such policies stereotype, stigmatize, and criminalize the poor without cause” (2013, p.1541). Studies support the assertion that applicants for welfare are no more likely to have substance abuse issues than are the general public. Moreover, problems that have arisen with drug testing results due to faulty testing and results. According to Pollack, et al, “Suspicionless, population-based chemical testing of welfare recipients will detect some “true positives” who are drug-dependent, a greater number of “accidental positives” with complex psychological problems, and a larger group of “false positives” who have no apparent psychiatric (including drug-related) disorder” (2002, p. 30). In this study conducted over two a year span, “the categories of “false positives,” and “accidental positives” each outnumbered the “true positives”” (Pollack, Danziger, Jayakody, Seefeldt, 2002).…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both articles describe the situation of the flag burning by Gregory Lee Johnson was a criminal act that should be penalized for, but the text of each of them explain their own opinionated answer on why so. The Texas vs Johnson Majority Opinion’s tone was more analytical, however, the editorial’s tone was a thoughtful and virtuous. Firstly, Texas vs Johnson, Majority Opinion article explicates the court case of Johnson about the burning of the flag in analytical tone. “We submit that nobody can suppose that this one gesture of an unknown man will change our Nation’s attitude toward its flag.”…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abel Fields Free Speech

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Today I’m here to express my views on the U.S. vs. Fields a very distinct and intriguing case that involves the topic of free speech. First we have the defendant Abel Fields who was convicted under the Stolen Valor Act, after Mr. Fields portrayed himself claiming that he had “military experience” claiming he had a Purple Heart, also the Medal of Honor, Navy Cross, and even the Air force cross. This made him believe that it gave him the right to speak with authority on the issues but these claims were false. Abel Fields appealed his decision to the court, stating that he viewed the Stolen Valor Act as unconstitutional and believes that his right to the first amendment was being violated. Field’s prosecutors argue that even though Mr. Fields…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our modern society, guns are entwined with escalating arguments about gun control and gun violence. Generally speaking, the quarrel scorches across the American terrain like a raging fire; practically every day there is a news story related to a firing arm. To demonstrate, a recent Central News Network article debriefs gun presence in relation to violence and other tragedies. In this case, guns association with homicides, terrorism and mass shootings. In compliance with statistics, there are more gun owners in the United States than anywhere else in the globe.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Alabama of 1932 was a landmark case in American history. The case brought to the forefront the issue of legal counsel being guaranteed by the 6th Amendment, and how that right applied to the States by the 14th Amendment. This case brought up the issues and concerns of what the requirements of the State was in this type of criminal proceedings. Due Process wasn’t given to the African American men in this case. The Incorporation Doctrine within the Fourteenth Amendment will now serve as a series of checks and balances so that state governments can’t make sure not to violate these rights that are given to our…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay, Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus (69 - 71), Derek Bok examines just how disruptive a confederate flag can be in a college campus as it has symbolic connections to slavery. Bok 's thesis is that such form of an expression can be offensive, however, this is not enough to prohibit such form of communication due to its First Amendment rights. Bok makes an adequate argument because he assesses the offensive nature of this act as well as the harm that is derived from censorship by mainly providing persuasive notions. Although Derek Bok makes a strong case behind his support of the First Amendment rights, the essay nevertheless conveys various weaknesses.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays