Summary: The Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb

Improved Essays
On August 31st, 1939 Germany invaded Poland, France and Great Britain responded by declaring war on Germany on September 3rd. This was considered the official start of the deadliest war in human history called, World War II with fatalities up to 50 million according to the authors, John Graham Royde Smith and Thomas A. Hughes (“World War II” Britannica.com, April 26, 2018). Meanwhile Japan was already at war with China two years earlier. The war consisted of two sides known as the Axis alliance which was formed by Germany, Italy, and Japan. While on the other side was the Allies also known as the United Nations. They were consisted of France, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union, and The United States. The United States did not officially join …show more content…
(page 3)” stood out to me as a summary as to why Truman had at that time chose to drop the bombs. The war at that point had already taken lives on both sides causing millions of deaths and large amounts of destruction on both ally and enemy sides. On July 26, 1945 United States President Harry S. Truman and James F. Byrnes along with Stalin and Molotov, Clement Attlee and Ernest Bevin issued a document known as the Potsdam Declaration which called for the unconditional surrender of japan (Smith, Hughes, “World War II”). This option was given to the Japanese but Japan refused to surrender and this forced Truman to look at his other options. Taking into consideration the amount of deaths being so high at that point and the Soviets continued expansion of communism, Truman chose to approve of the atomic bombings on japan. This choice saved not only Americans but many ally and Japanese lives from further sacrificing themselves for the war. It was the fastest way to end the six year long brutal war. This also served as warning to nations like the Soviets to not attempt to continue to cause conflict and put an end to it all. Obviously, it had worked, not only did the bombings play a part in the surrender of japan it also lowered

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    With over 200,000 casualties due to his mindset, he failed to account for the other opportunities he had to guarantee America’s success in the war. Other alternatives that could have been substituted for the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki include receiving assistance from the Soviet Union, intensifying existing war strategies and compromising on Japan’s capitulation. With all these in mind, President Truman had no right to put atomic bombs to use on the Japanese population. It is a shame that Harry Truman missed all these opportunities to end World War Two earlier than it did just because he saw it more fit to drop atomic bombs on a civilian population. This does not justify his actions though as mankind can never unseal the great magnitude of nuclear…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prompt & Utter Destruction is a book by J. Samuel Walker that details the events leading up the decision for the United States to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. Narrative-like descriptions of cabinet meetings, personal diary entries of important players, and first-hand accounts from soldiers in the war are all artfully pieced together to recreate the story of Truman’s decision, overturning many common misconceptions about the era and presenting new information. While Walker presents his own conclusions using the data he has compiled, he is careful to leave room for the reader to make his/her own inferences with the same data, and admits there are plenty of gaps in his information that could potentially…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DBQ: Dropping the Atomic Bomb on Japan The decision President Truman had to make regarding dropping a fission bomb onto Japanese cities in order to end the war would have been too hard for most of us to handle. America was weary after 4 years of almost total war with Germany, Italy, and Japan and the war needed to end. At this point, Japan was alone and dragging its feet after many losses. From the history we know, the decision was justified as it ended a devastating war with no end in sight and it saved more lives than were lost.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    World War II Dbq

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1 September 1939, Germany invaded Poland but the Allied nations issued an ultimatum that Germany must remove her troops under the threat of war. Germany did not give in to the Allied ultimatum and invaded Poland but Britain and France guaranteed Poland, independence and were going to defend her so on the 3rd of September 1939, Britain and France declared war on Germany and that was the start of World War II. World War II was fought by two alliances of countries, which was the Axis Powers, formed by Nazi Germany, Italy and Japan. The opposing alliance was the Allies, formed by Britain and France but the USA joined the Allies when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbour, also USSR joined when Hitler broke the Non-Aggression Pact and Germany invaded…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    due to its large military, “The total strength of the Japanese Army was estimated at 5,000,000 men… the major fighting would not end until the latter part of 1946, at the earliest” (Document #3). The size of Japan’s military and the estimated prolonging of the war provided the U.S. with an uncertainty that they would not have liked to accept. To eradicate this uncertainty and provide a rapid end to the war, the U.S. took the opportunity at hand and launched both atomic bombs. In the end, this decision proved triumphant as they evaded a lengthy battle with Japan and ended the long, treacherous…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As the Japanese already established their willingness to fight tooth and nail for Japan and the battles of Iwo Jima and Okinawa suggesting a substantial amount of loss of life and property for an invasion of Japan homeland. The atomic bombs were possibly the only alterative to what an invasion would hold, as author Bernstein defines with America’s potential Invasion of Japan on the horizon, Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, details an estimation of over 250,000 American casualties and up to a million men for an invasion of Japan (Bernstein, 550). With America’s estimations and the expected outcomes of invasion of Japan, suggesting a bloodbath “an all-out fight to the death” between the Japanese population and American soldiers, The atomic bombs had to be dropped, as not dropping the atomic bombs the invasion of Japan would have most likely preceded instead, thus prolonging the war, causing substantial amounts of casualties and costing a great amount of funds and resources to overtsee the operation. The atomic bombs provided an alternative to risking anymore American lives. Similarly, by July 1945, the Japanese military continued refuse surrender.…

    • 2113 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    " On the other hand, the United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was a military measure to ensure that Japan would fully surrender. In Document H titled, Radio Address, Harry S Truman, President Truman stated, “We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans.” He stated that the U.S had used the atomic bombs to end the war quickly and to save more American lives. However, as said by General HH Arnold, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” This meant that even if the bombs weren’t used, then Japan still would have…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were several justification that Truman weighed when he approved of the bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It was revealed on his diary of his uncertainty…

    • 1911 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tens of thousands were killed in the bombing, naming it inhumane. The bomb’s purpose was not to harm innocent people, its purpose was to first get the Japanese government to surrender, if didn’t surrender then attack cities that help create war material. Innocent lives could have been saved if they evacuated the cities as warned. The dropping of the two atomic bombs saved millions of lives of Americans and the lives of Japaneses. The Japanese government plan was to invade America in a land invasion, causing up to 5 to 10 million casualties of Japanese fighters.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Truman saw that by ending this war, it would not only save American lives, but also Europeans, Indians, Koreans, Vietnamese, and Chinese lives. In fact, according to Newman’s essay Dropping the Bomb was Necessary and Justifiable “ Harry Truman ordered the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki primarily to end the war as soon as possible and save lives”(Newman,414). However, I believe it is important to understand that it was not just Truman’s decision to drop the bomb. In fact the Interim Committee was put together for the purpose of supporting Truman with making decisions regarding the atomic bomb. In a primary document of recommendation the Interim Committee suggests the combat use of the bomb against Japan.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The use of the Atomic Bomb was both necessary and justified as it immediately ended World War II, solidified the United States as a superpower, and contained the germinating powers of Japan and Russia. The use of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately ended World War II and stopped the continuation of catastrophic and widespread violence in Japan. The Japanese had an audacious outlook on their offense throughout the duration of the war. It was suggested by Admiral William E. Leahy that, “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender”(Source 2).…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bombing in Japan In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, causing major destruction and life threatening issues, over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Everyone has their own take on what really happened and have their own perspective on controversies regarding the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. Perspectives that I will be discussing today are from three disciplines: scientific view (Leo Szilard), journalism view (Wilfred Bruchett), and historical view (a writer of an article called “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” and Bernard Feld’s article “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). Each have their own unique approach on the atomic bomb and it’s affects.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Bomb During the summer of 1945, things were looking pretty grim for Imperial Japan, as they were the last axis power left and had been under constant firebombing for the United States, President Truman chose to drop two atomic bombs, one on Hiroshima on August 6th and one on Nagasaki on August 9th. Since before either of the two bombs had been dropped, it has been debated whether or not it was the right decision. Truman stated that the bombs were dropped to save American lives, but many argue over the government’s other motives at the time. Many bring up valid points over why the bomb should not have been dropped and that the government public justification for dropping the bomb was based off of false information, but ultimately the motivation behind dropping the bomb, hidden by the government or not, outweighs the reasons for not dropping the bomb.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As it is essential to recognize that not only was Japan ready to surrender and were given no choice to modify its unconditional surrender. But also destroyed two cities which were limited in military value and had civilians out number Japanese troops, but also were destroyed simply fro power in politics between the U.S and the Soviet Union. The facts from the presidents administrators, secretary of war and even Truman’s chief of staff all stood together and stated that it was unethical, barbaric and abhorrent. Many historians have fought continuously over which was decision was right or wrong to choose, but most evidence indicates that it was the wrong thing to do morally. Furthermore, the bomb was used for several wrong reasons such as causing fear to both Soviet and Japanese governments, in order to put an end to the war and be capable of unconditionally place restrictions at both governments basically holding both countries hostage until their demands were…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Issues In Ww2

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The saying “all is fair in love and war” comes to play in this instance. Our military had a problem to fix in order to do their duty by protecting American soil and they managed to fix it the best way they knew how, given certain conditions and complications. Unfortunately the Hiroshima explosion wiped out about 90 percent of the city, killing 80,000 people instantly and tens of thousands later died of radiation exposure, but it could have been a lot worse for both sides. There was a time for them to surrender without any consequences when the U.S. proposed the Potsdam Declaration, which threatened the Japanese with “prompt and utter destruction” if they refused and of course Japan denied. In return, we blew their world up.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays