Summary Of Abortion By Judith Jarvis Thomson

Improved Essays
Name: Mohammadamin Malek Pour Judith Jarvis Thomson on her article about the morality of abortion gives us some simple and understandable examples. First, she considers the fetus is a person, although she thinks this is a “slope slippery arguments”. In her article, she simply argues that the mother has the right to her body and abortion can be permissible. First, she gives an example of a violinist who is attached to you without your permission and you have to keep the violinist for nine months. In this example, she is trying to compare the attached violinist to pregnancy due to rape. She argues that according to “the extreme view” if the fetus, even in pregnancy due to rape, is a person; therefore, it has a right to life and we cannot abort it. Then she opposes against the arguments which say a third party cannot perform the abortion, even if mother’s life is in danger she is the only one who can perform the abortion and a third party cannot choose between them. Thomson gives an example of two persons, Smith and Jones. They both are freezing and there is only one coat and Smith owns it. In the meanwhile, someone walking by and Smith asks him to help him to get his coat back. Thomson asserts that it would be ridiculous if the person says that I cannot choose your life over Jones’ life; …show more content…
I think it was a clever move to consider the fetus as a person to find a common ground to make her argument more acceptable for ones with extreme views on abortion. However, in my point of view, some of her examples and arguments are too broad and sometimes too simple to be acceptable. Also, I, personally, do not consider the fetus as a person, and I think if the fetus is a person then it has the right to life and we cannot kill people because we do not like them or we do not want

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In this argument, the limitation placed on the right to life is taking resources from others. One example would be needing an organ transplant. Needing an organ to survive does not entitle you to take it from someone else, and it does not entitle you to certain other resources, like the best hospital or the soonest transplant time. Thomson follows this argument to its logical conclusion. If a fetus has a right to life, but the right to life has limitations on what resources you can take from other people, then the fetus has no right to the body of the woman carrying it.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Prompt I In this section I am going to present the standard argument against abortion and then present Thompson’s argument by…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although I make the start of a rational and mature argument, Thomson would respond in the following way. She acknowledges that her argument can be found unsatisfactory “ First, while I do argue that abortion is not impermissible, I do not argue that it is always permissible” (Thomson, J. Judith). Thomson agrees that if the minimal requirement is to carry the fetus to term then the minimally decent mother shall not fall below. There are certain circumstances that she deems abortion to be impermissible.…

    • 98 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She suggests that a parent becomes morally obligated to the fetus when they decide to not have an abortion and do not try to prevent a pregnancy and therefore allow the baby to be born without efforts of adoption. When they take the baby home, they assume responsibility for the child and cannot withdraw support from the child. She believes that just because of biological relationships, there is no special obligation to it. They can choose to assume responsibility or they can choose to not take responsibility. Until they accept responsibility, it is morally permissible to have an abortion.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These cases are supposed to be analogous to cases of rape, threat to life, or when a woman has taken reasonable precautions not to get pregnant. Thomson does not, however she concludes that abortion is justified in any and every case. There is a moral requirement to be a Minimally Decent Samaritan as Thomson puts it, and this makes a late abortion wrong if it is done just for the sake of convenience. To use her example, it would be wrong for a woman in her seventh month of pregnancy to get an abortion just to avoid the nuisance of postponing a trip…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And she also says that in extreme cases where the life of the mother is at stake and the pregnancy is due to rape then we cannot come to the conclusion that the morality of abortion depends on moral status of the fetus. This is because regardless of a fetus assumed to have moral status, it does not enforce that the woman is morally obliged to allow the fetus to use her body for 9 months. (Thomson, 54-57) To expand further, Thomson says an abortion is moral when the woman has not assumed a “special responsibility” for the fetus such as allowing the pregnancy to last longer than the normal time to abort. She believes that choosing one’s body over the fetus who is innocent with a right to life is not morally wrong as long as the killing is not done unjustly.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And because of that, you have a form of parental responsibility towards your child. I don’t argue that the parental responsibility prevents you from having an abortion, but that Thompson 's analogy falls short, as it does not address parental…

    • 1265 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is the planned termination of a human pregnancy. Several philosophers and activists have argued over if it is permissible. The author of A Defense of Abortion, Judith Jarvis Thomson, is correct about her argument that abortion is permissible even if the fetus is a person. This is because a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, which, combined with the woman’s own right to life, takes precedent over a fetus’s right to life. Even if people claim that she gave the fetus permission to be there, she should not be forced into going against her right to bodily autonomy.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Disregarding the mother’s perspective can be compared to getting an arm amputated and declaring the action is immoral from the arms point of view. Abortion differs in each case and no situation is the same, to equate a case to another is immoral and unfair to the parties involved. Marquis writes “Since we do believe that it is wrong to kill defenseless little babies, it is important that a theory of the wrongness of killing easily account for this” although he is using emotional blackmail, it does not stray me from pointing out that embryos are not babies and due to the account of miscarriages and health issues it is not determined they will have a future. Pregnancy is a dangerous time for the mother and fetus and most miscarriages happen between 7 and 12 weeks. Killing is the worst of crimes except in the cases of self-defense.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    "Catholic Church and Abortion." Bbc.co.uk. N.p., 03 Aug. 2009. Web. 22 May 2016. .…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Munson said, "Minkoff and Paltrow argue that legislation expanding the definition of "child" to include fetuses has adverse effects for women carrying a child to term" (Munson, p. 756). In saying this, the fetuses rights have dismissed pregnant women 's rights (Minkoff and Paltrow, p. 757). Expecting mothers have to give up the right to good paying jobs. Minkoff and Paltrow says, "The fetal 'right ' to health and life has cost women heir bodily integrity /.../, their liberty /.../, and in some cases their lives /.../" (Minkoff and Paltrow, p. 757). In saying this, third parties are being allowed to speak on behalf of the fetus and out ruling the mother.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Patrick Lee’s and Robert P. George’s, On The Wrong of Abortion, it is argued that abortions are objectively immoral. To support this conclusion, Lee and George state that, the fetus is a complete person in an immature phase of development, that the fetus has the potential to develop into a “person” and that abortions are intentional killings. Pro-Choice defenders argue that a human fetus is not a human being because it cannot live on its own, that they are not ‘people’, and that the mother has the executive decision of not wanting the child in her uterus. According to Patrick Lee in another one of his works, The Pro-Life Argument from Substantial Identity: A Defence. Bioethics , He claims that “What makes it wrong to kill you or me now would…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think that Warren needs to stress the claim that while both a fetus and infant are not persons, by her definition of personhood, a fetus’s rights are completely dependent on the mother, in contrast to an infant. While a fetus is inside of the mother, a fetus is not a part of the moral community, and all the mother’s rights outweigh the fetus’s. The fetus’s right to life is overridden by the mothers right to her body because she has full moral status, while the fetus does not. An infant however, no longer is dependent on their mother’s rights, since it’s not using her body to…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    She isn’t claiming that abortions are always permissible or that it is permissible to secure the death of an unborn child. I do not believe in abortion for reasons I will not address at this time and therefore am not claiming to feel the same Thomson does about all of her arguments, but I do agree that the “right to life” argument is not a solid one. With the analogies Thomson set out, it is clear that cases must be looked at individually because the details make all the difference. I feel she succeeds in her goal. She challenges the way I feel about abortion and requires that I justify my reasons for or against it for more than just the fetus’s “right to…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    She suggests that because a pregnancy is such a great sacrifice, that, while women should carry a child to term after becoming pregnant, we cannot require them to do so. This argument also requires that the fetus’ right to life is subject to the mother’s whim and does not carry as much weight as the first two arguments. Thomson concludes the article by saying that she is not attempting to delineate the circumstances in which a pregnancy might be morally permissible and those in which it isn’t, but rather to make it clear that even if we consider a fetus to be a person, that abortion can still be morally permissible. This weakens her argument a great deal, instead of providing a proscriptive criterion to base the morality of abortion on, she simply provides what may be a series of fringe cases to establish that while abortion is normally wrong, it isn’t always so. Thomson’s argument on abortion is fundamentally deontological.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays

Related Topics