Subpoena Vs Compulsory Process

Improved Essays
Based on the 6th Amendment of the Constitution there are two clauses that compel a witness to attend a trial. The Confrontation Clause states that an accused individual should receive the right to be confronted the witness against him. The Compulsory Process Clause says that the accused shall have the right to have witnesses in favor of them by the use of a subpoena. A subpoena is a document that is issued by the court or an attorney, and served to a witness compelling that individual to attend court. A subpoena is typically used when an individual has information about the case, but does not want to become involved; therefore the subpoena requires that individual become involved. These rights are available to and individual in federal or state

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    While the Fourteenth Amendment establishes due process and equal protection of the law. The Garrity Rights begin in New Jersey when two law enforcement officers were being investigated. These two officers were given the choice to either incriminate themselves or to loss their jobs under a statute on the grounds of self-incrimination. The confessions of the officers were taken; however, their confession was not voluntary, but coerced as they were under the impression that they would lose their jobs if they did not cooperate with the internal investigation. The purpose of this case study is to determine whether these officers’ Fifth and Fourteenth…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Gonzales Case Study

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Individual’s rights are spelt out in legislation. In the case of R v. Gonzales the rights of Sef Gonzales were ensured throughout the investigation and subject to the closest inspection by the Judge and appellant court and found to comply. The facts were closely scrutinised and Gonzales was found guilty by a random representation of the public in the form of a Jury. Even after being found guilty, Gonzales was granted an appeal, further proof that justice and equity was served. He was sentenced to life imprisonment, meaning he will remain there for the term of his natural life.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fifth Amendment says that no one can be accused of a crime unless a grand jury decides that there is enough evidence to charge a person for a crime in court. The defendant has a choice to testify or not to testify. If they choose to testify, the defendant loses his Fifth Amendment privilege and must answer the questions asked. However, at the trial the defendant who has been called to the witness stand by the grand jury can refuse to answer certain…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Procedural Due Process

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fourteenth Amendment extended the liberties offered federally by the Fifth Amendment to the state level of government, which established the Due Process Clause (Chapman & Yoshino, n.d.). Furthermore, the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees procedural due process, the individual rights listed in the Bill of Rights, incorporated against the states, and substantive due process (Chapman & Yoshino, n.d.). In the case of In re Gault, Gault was confined to an Industrial School until his twenty-first birthday, and the Supreme Court determined the sentence was a violation of procedural due process afforded by the Fourteenth Amendment (Cornell Law School, n.d.). Consequently, procedural due process outlines the processes the government must follow before depriving an individual of life, liberty, or property (Chapman & Yoshino, n.d.).…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One quote is “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime was committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witness against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense (Bill of Rights).” This is the sixth amendment exactly. It gives the people multiple rights. The sixth amendment to the Bill of Rights is the most needed because it grants the right to a speedy trial by jury, to have no one subject to the same offense twice, and to have the assistance of the council for his defense (What the Sixth…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Examples of the basis in which the judiciary would determine if the law or statute revokes the constitutional right of an American would be as…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The sixth amendment, which is the right to counsel is used to ensure fairness across the board. A right to counsel is needed to avoid unjust convictions as well as to protect the individual’s rights. Every defendant is entitled to counsel. Counsel is automatically provided to those who are facing the death penalty, are illiterate, or don’t have enough money to pay for one themselves. The sixth amendment guarantees the right to waive assistance of counsel and conduct one's own defense.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Selective Incorporation

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While the ideal example of a democracy places the decisions of government in citizen’s hands, the United States rarely does as such. For example, the Supreme Court, while influenced by public approval and public opinion, isolates itself from the media and public in two specific ways. Its Justices, appointed by the president, are indirect methods for people to get what they want from the highest branch of the Judiciary Branch. Similar to the method and processes used to elect a president through the Electoral College, the Supreme Court works in a way that places the power of the government in educated individuals’ hands as opposed to the direct power of votes in an election for a state governor. It indirectly allows people to influence Court…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What do you think about the miranda rights.these miranda rights can also be called the miranda warning. Weah do you think it is important that cops read you your miranda rights. Another good question is what would happen if i did not read you your miranda rights, well if a cop doesn’t read your miranda rights then some people think they can escape punishment. the reason cops read you your miranda rights is if you're in trouble you might want to know what you can do to help your case. However A Cop still has to infer these to you.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Sixth Amendment simply ensured that the defendant in a federal criminal case who could afford to hire counsel would be entitled to appear through a lawyer, rather than being forced to defend himself. The U.S Supreme Courts and the State Supreme Courts came to an agreement that the government should provide lawyer to the vast majority of criminal defendants who cannot afford to hire a lawyer. According to Worrall the United State V. Wade (388 U.S.2189 (1967)) “The presence of counsel is necessary to preserve the defendant’s basic right to a fair trial”.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land made up of the 7 articles and the U.S. Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is a document with a group of Amendments, which are articles added to the U.S Constitution. The Fifth Amendment was introduced into the U.S Constitution on September 5th, 1789. The five clauses within the Fifth Amendment stay consistent with the meaning of the Bill of Rights in that they promote a balance between the people and the government, and limits on government power and procedure. The Fifth Amendment contains five protections vital to a person accused of crime; the right to Grand Jury, to double jeopardy charges, compelled self-incrimination, due process, and just compensation.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argument Against Welfare Testing

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited

    University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law. (Vol. 15, Is. 5, pp. 1539-1559) Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.southuniversity.libproxy.edmc.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=6b36aece-4bd5-4961-b371-ca7f92032795%40sessionmgr110&vid=2&hid=125 Martin, D. (2012, March 18).…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Amendment

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The government on occasion follows the first amendment, a recent…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis of Atticus’ Closing Testimony As citizens of the United States, we are inevitably entitled to certain rights that cannot be taken away from us. According to the Bill of Rights, Amendment six states, “In all criminal cases, an accused person, for whatever allegations, has the right to a public attorney (if one cannot afford one), a speedy trial, and an impartial jury.” The key word here is “impartial,” meaning fair and nondiscriminatory, but not in this case. When appearing in court, the defendant, plaintiff, and jury are required to recite a specific oath while their right hand is raised.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individuals should not give up their natural rights because we are all born into a civil society with laws and contacts in place and if we abide by all laws within a civil society we would not be forced to give up our…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays