1. A paradigm is a set of concepts that are both theoretical and philosophical used in a discipline, to help form theories. A paradigm is made up of basic assumptions, patterns, methodology etc. Paradigms are commonly accepted by members of a specific scientific community. The three main kinds are structural functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism. These three tend to dominate the sociological thinking because they provide useful explanations.
2. A theory is a way to explain different aspects of social interactions. They are the information and aspects to form and build a hypothesis. There are many different theories and they are separated into different groups based on the scale of the issue they are trying to explain. …show more content…
The social- conflict paradigm is a social theory developed by Karl Marx. This paradigm is marco-oriented and views society as unequal which results in conflict and social change. Social conflict theory displays social life as a competition for …show more content…
The the “i” vs “me” theory created by G.H Mead, the “i” piece is the focus of our own opinions of ourselves. In this case you are in the moment and non worrying about other people inputs of judgements. The “me” piece of this theory is the awareness of how others feel we should behave in a given situation. You respond based on these judgements and inputs that society has in place.
16. In ethnomethodology, it's analysis depends on individuals using everyday conversations and gestures to gain a better understanding of how the world works. Symbolic interactionism, although very similar, focuses on symbols to view social behaviors in an environment.
17. I think that Marx's theory of alienation sheds the most light on the United States today. I feel a lot of people don't feel connected or like what their doing in their job is beneficial or appreciated. Although it may not be talked about alot, many work environments force behaviors and dont leave room for a lot of creativity which is why half of Americans feel unhappy in their work environments. I think places of work could change or help make their employees feel valued and like what their doing is important, instead of just focusing on the
2. A theory is a way to explain different aspects of social interactions. They are the information and aspects to form and build a hypothesis. There are many different theories and they are separated into different groups based on the scale of the issue they are trying to explain. …show more content…
The social- conflict paradigm is a social theory developed by Karl Marx. This paradigm is marco-oriented and views society as unequal which results in conflict and social change. Social conflict theory displays social life as a competition for …show more content…
The the “i” vs “me” theory created by G.H Mead, the “i” piece is the focus of our own opinions of ourselves. In this case you are in the moment and non worrying about other people inputs of judgements. The “me” piece of this theory is the awareness of how others feel we should behave in a given situation. You respond based on these judgements and inputs that society has in place.
16. In ethnomethodology, it's analysis depends on individuals using everyday conversations and gestures to gain a better understanding of how the world works. Symbolic interactionism, although very similar, focuses on symbols to view social behaviors in an environment.
17. I think that Marx's theory of alienation sheds the most light on the United States today. I feel a lot of people don't feel connected or like what their doing in their job is beneficial or appreciated. Although it may not be talked about alot, many work environments force behaviors and dont leave room for a lot of creativity which is why half of Americans feel unhappy in their work environments. I think places of work could change or help make their employees feel valued and like what their doing is important, instead of just focusing on the