Structural Family Therapy (MST)

Two family therapy models that share similarities as well express fundamental differences are Structural Family Therapy (SFT) and Milan Systemic Therapy (MST). Both models identify the purpose of counseling as not solving a specific model, but addressing the interactions and relationships within the family unit (Wetchler and Hecker, 2015). As a result, this is a shared strength of each family therapy model. Even though both approaches identify differing intervention techniques, focusing on the “why,” as opposed to the “what,” gives not only the family, but counselors the ability to work towards solutions. Another key similarity between both models is the idea of non-normativity when it comes to the constitution of a family system; there isn’t any one model of a family that is considered better or ideal than others (Wetchler and …show more content…
SFT focus on family hierarchies and boundaries are crucial to positive family functioning. Wetchler and Hecker (2015) note the importance of the technique of restructuring within the family unit as a means to changing negative or destructive family relationships. While I agree with the idea of restructuring, if incorrectly assessed by a counselor based on the presentation of the entire family unit during counseling, it may be difficult to discern positive from negative. Therefore, a family may be encouraged to restructure in what could potentially be a harmful manner. MST relies on the notion of continuous hypothesizing about family difficulties or situations (Wetchler and Hecker, 2015). To myself, this appears to be a very interesting and effective method for gaining information, as well as inviting interactions. However, if a hypothesis is way off the mark, I believe it could damage the therapeutic alliance for a session for one or more members, or even damage the counseling relationship in