Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Us Constitution

Decent Essays
Why did the farmers of the united states constitution at the end finally decided to give more power to the federal government rather than the state government? I'm going to be talking about problems with the articles of confederation with the strengths and weaknesses. I will be discussing the federal government on why the framers chose to create a stronger federal government the federal government should have the power because the national government is armed with positive and complete authority in all cases the people that were hurt was the ones that didn't like what they were doing. Know i'm going to be talking about the state government on why the framers should have kept the posers in the state government, they should have kept them because, they know what they're doing and have a strong state they want to help people the only people getting hurt are the ones that want the federalists to win which keeps all there money to himself and has all the power. know last i'm going to be talking about the constitution what does the constitution say about federal and state powers Under the Tenth Amendment, the powers not given to the federal government by the Constitution, as well as any powers not specifically denied to the States, belong to the States, or to the people. …show more content…
Some of the weaknesses were that each state has one vote, regardless of population and that congress has to establish temporary counts to hear cases of piracy. There really wasn't any strengths im sure they had some but not very many. Another weakness was that there was no executive to administer and enforce legislation congress has sole authority to government. There really was a lot of weaknesses and not many

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Summary Kee and Shannon (1992) offer a historical analysis to explain the changes in power and responsibility of the state/local government and the federal government. They examine the following three historical periods of federalism to understand the shifting eras of power between the fifty states and the United States capitol. 1.The 1789-1932 era: the federal government’s domestic role was limited and states were fiscally stronger and had a large degree of autonomy (Kee & Shannon, 1992).…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are similarities between the two governments but the structure of the Constitution is better than its predecessor the Articles of Confederation. To support this claim, there are multiple forms of textual evidence that can be used. To start, when the Constitution was first introduced as an improvement to the A.of C. two noteworthy rebellions are caused. (Doc. D and Doc. E.)…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Framers of the United States Constitution ultimately decided to give more power to the Federal government rather than the state governments because the articles of confederation wasn’t running our country in the right direction. The Articles of confederation had no central power, at all. The Federal government then became the main focus of the two contracts, because it was more stable. Under the Articles of Confederation the state held all the power and they gave some power to the federal government, which caused economic, trading and law problems. The constitution then gave more power to the federal government and gave the states less power because that would give a central power for people.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government was considered weak because it has no authority over interstate and foreign trade matter. States are free to conduct their own respective business and the federal government has no say to whatever states do. So, with states acting like its own sovereign nation rather than a type of government under the federal government, the relationship between the two government is chaotic. In this paper, I am going to discuss further details about why federal government was considered weak under the Articles of Confederation and the changes that were written into the Constitution of the United States that solves the interrelationship problem between the federal and states under the Articles of…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Articles of Confederation and Constitution of 1787 The Constitution of 1787 came after the Articles of Confederation simply because the Articles of Confederation had a week central government that caused many issues which led to the Constitution of 1787 to stop the states from having individual power and to make all states equal. The Constitution of 1787 was to ratify the Articles of Confederation and to form a much better constitution. With the Articles of Confederation there were many issues.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During and after the Revolutionary War, each state set up their own government and laws to give themselves power and rights. The states did not want the same thing to happen to them by a stronger government, that happened with the British government creating taxes and laws against the colony, so the states gave the central government limited powers. The attempt to create a limited government in the Articles of Confederation failed because it gave the central government limited powers. The American government couldn’t effectively create and enforce rules because the states had all the real power, which made the central government weak.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    In order to resolve the differences, delegates from the majority of the states met at the Annapolis Convention in 1786. But they were not able to reach any agreeable conclusion. That led them to decide to meet again later in Philadelphia. In second convention, delegates observed that there is urgent need to frame an entirely new constitution. A key issue of conflict was the structure of the new legislative branch.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The new federal government consisted of a Congress of delegates chosen by state legislature rather than voters. Not allowing the people to vote for their delegates is a weakness of the Articles of Confederation. Also giving the federal government little say in things is a downfall as well. Likewise they couldn’t come up with a common currency or regulate interstate commerce or levy taxes. If they didn’t have a common currency buying things in a…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation’s first flaw is that it did not give congress hardly any power. For a country to run properly and fairly, it needs to have a strong central government. When the government is not given enough power, States start to branch off and try to be…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At first, under the Articles of Confederation, the leaders wanted a government based on popular sovereignty, which was by the people-for the people. Because these leaders had just come out of such tight control under the rule of Great Britain, the states didn’t want to give the government too much power. This gave the majority of the power to the states. However, the political leaders soon realized that individual state governments weren’t working and decided to change the rule of the government once more. Now the country shifted to a strong central government with a bicameral legislature of a congress with the Senate and the House of Representatives.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Following the end of the Revolutionary War, America needed a government system that was different from the British Government, this led to the birth of the Articles of Confederation. The articles were first reviewed in 1777 in Philadelphia, but it wasn 't until four years later that they were ratified by the existing 13 states. These articles only managed to keep the country together until it was replaced by the superior Constitution in 1789. The main reason the Articles were significantly weak is was that sovereign power in the states was too strong, as mentioned in the 2nd article “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.” Seeing as the United States separated from Britain, a monarchy, the first draft of American government did not have a strong centralized government.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the United States declared its independence from Great Britain with the Treaty of Paris in 1783, a document was written that would serve as the national government of the United States. This written document is called The Articles of Confederation. These Articles gave no power to the Congress to act on the requests for money or troops, and by the end of 1786, governmental efficiency was extremely low. However, The Articles did offer the new nation an understanding of how a written self-governing nation works. Learning the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation opened the door to the Constitutional Convention and the present-day form of U.S. government.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The flaws in the constitution are not limited to intentional ambiguity and vagueness, for major issue can be found in chapter four, which despite not being included within the section marked specifically for listing the rights of Thai people, clearly limits the freedoms of the Thai people and must be addressed. Chapter four is entitled “Duties of the Thai People,” and delineates the relationship between the Thai people and the executive government. The first of these “duties” is listed under section seventy and states “Every person has a duty to protect and uphold the nation, the religion, the King, an the democratic regime with the King as the Head of State.” When combined with section seventy one, which states “ Every person has a duty to defend the country, to protect the interests of the country and obey the law,” the rights from the previous chapter are almost entirely undermined. By including these clauses, the government essentially states that if they deem anything that a Thai person is doing, whether it be accessing information that criticizes the government or practicing an unpopular religion, that person will be violating their duties.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without these keystone structure the congress proved to be in a disadvantage. Overall with no uniform systems upon each state, truly portrays disorganization rather than unity. These attributes established the weakness within the Articles of Confederation thus needed to be replaced. The Articles contributed to a ineffective, inconsistent, and weakness of a early central institution. Neglecting the faults of the Articles of Confederation, it became one of the major steppingstone which progressed America to the…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compare and Contrast United States Constitution and Iroquois Constitution The Iroquois Constitution and the United States Constitution are very different yet very similar. They relate to each other on many different levels. They both serve as foundations for constitutions all over the world. Other constitutions that have been made presently look back on these two constitutions and kind of use them as a guideline.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays