Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation Research

Improved Essays
The Articles of Confederation were written by a committee that Congress appointed in 1776 to draft a constitution for the new nation that was being formed following independence from Britain. The committee wrote what is known as the Articles of Confederation but really called the “Articles of Confusion” because they were written poorly. Although they were adopted by Congress on November 5, 1777. The Articles went into effect on March 1, 1781, and lasted until March 4, 1789 when they were replaced by the US Constitution, which was a vast improvement from the articles of Confederation. The purpose of the Articles of Confederation was to create a confederation of states whereby each state retained "its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, …show more content…
Congress did establish a tax quota for each of the states and then asked them to contribute on a voluntarily basis, but few states did. Less than one-fourth of states would collect taxes. Individual states often placed high taxes on goods from other states to make money. Another weakness of the Articles of Confederation was that Congress could declare war, but it lacked the power to raise a national army. Congress could ask the states to provide troops from the state militias, but the states could refuse. So realistically there wasn’t a national army because none of the states wanted to initiate one which was a major weakness because it’s crucial to have a national army ready to fight. On top of not having the power to raise a national army, Congress had no power to coin money, therefore each state developed its own currency. The fact that each state had its own currency made it difficult for the states to trade and buy with each other since they all had different currency’s. Yet as stated earlier under the Articles of Confederation, Congress had no way to collect taxes from the states to pay off this …show more content…
Fifty-five emissaries from all the states except Rhode Island met in a small brick statehouse that facilitated conversations that led to eventual compromises. With George Washington as chairman of the “demigods” compromises were made to achieve their goal of having a firm, dignified, and respected government. Instead of rewriting the Articles of Confederation which is what Congress suggested, the committee scrapped the Articles and started with a clean slate of paper for the Constitution. After intensive debate which took place over the summer, a plan was written that established three branches of national government. These branches of the government are known as the executive, legislative and judicial branches. A system of checks and balances was put into place so that no single branch would have too much authority. The issue of equal representation in Congress that was poorly addressed in the Articles of Confederation was properly addressed in the Constitution. Delegates from larger states wanted number of representatives in Congress to be based on population, but of course small states called for equal representation. The Connecticut Compromise took in the wants of both sides and proposed a bicameral legislature with the House of Representatives based on state population and the Senate has equal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To begin this change, political men from each state met in Philadelphia in May of 1787 to discuss how to make their country better. They decided to stop trying to reform the Articles of Confederation and just restart with a new Constitution. The first thing to happen was the Great Compromise, or the Connecticut Compromise. This arose from two smaller plans, the Virginia and New Jersey Plan. The Virginia Plan was meant to work out for the larger states as it called for representation in the central government based on the population of each state.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Question #1: The first compromise was the decision to replace the Articles of Confederation rather than amend it. The initial plan of the Constitutional Convention attendees was to amend the Articles of Confederation. Two attendees, Governor Randolph from Virginia and William Patterson from New Jersey, shared their own modifications early on, known as the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan. As these plans were discussed, it became obvious that a new document was needed.…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the revolutionary war the newly formed united states still had a major task ahead of them. They had to form a government that would help the satisfy the people's needs and demands. So the government created a system that would help solve many problems. This system would help protect people and also create a strong central government.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of these was known as the Madison’s Virginia Plan. This was by James Madison who was from Virginia. A national form of government should be established consisting of the branches Legislative, Executive and Judiciary. This type of government was very different than that of the Confederation. The delegates were set very much in their ways that they voted to accept this after only a very little…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore there was a lot of communication within states. Which meant that if there was ever a conflict then they could resolve it without war, or severe consequences. The Articles of Confederation had many strength, but as did weaknesses. A weakness was that Congress had no type of income, because each state had their own currency. Congress wasn’t able to impose taxes; they were only allowed to borrow money.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas and events that led to the belief that the Articles of Confederation was not working well (was because Congress had no power to regulate trade, coin money, collect taxes, or establish a military.) The Articles of Confederation was established to create the national government of the United States after the declaring independence from Great Britain. The purpose of creating the Articles of Confederation was to guarantee states of not “surrendering their sovereignty powers,” freedom, and independence (Davidson p. 152). The Articles of Confederation failed to regulate trade “Wit the outbreak of the Revolution, Americans had suffered an immediate loss of the manufactured goods, markets, and credit that Britain had formerly supplied,” (Davidson…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation granted powers to the states and to the federal government. By doing this it showed that all 13 colonies were united in some way. Even though congress did not have direct authority over citizens or even regulate taxes,…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles established the basic functions of national government in America after its newfound independence from Britain. The Articles were not strong enough to prevent conflict in the states, Shays’ Rebellion, so states wanted more power (Doc G). Americans called for change in the Articles, so delegates from all the states met at the Constitutional Convention and instead of just making minor changes to the Articles, wrote the Constitution. The government was stronger after the Constitution, but Americans still argued about whether they liked it or not, Federalist versus Anti-Federalists (Doc I). Citizens also asked for a Bill of Rights…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While the Articles of Confederation seemed to be working well for a short amount of time, some great flaws within their system began to show. The Articles of Confederation gave Congress almost no power to do anything, because they were not receiving any money. Because Congress had no way to tax the states, they had to ask the states for money, which didn’t work very efficiently. The states were also allowed to have their own form of currency, which made it difficult to make payments between states.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Under the Articles of Confederation, the government was not completely effective because of the power imbalance, the nation's needs not being met, and financial struggles. Congress did not have strength over the people to enforce laws; the citizens desired a less powerful government after the harsh rule the British government enforced on them previously. They got a weaker government, but the Congress lost its authority to rule over the states. Citizens felt that the government lacked in stability and unable to deal with the nation's problems. A military was a basic need for the states, but because of the cost, congress struggled to pay for one.…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This left Congress unable to create any trade agreements or policies with foreign power, limiting what they could include in treaties. These examples of economic limitations and disorganization under the Articles of Confederation help demonstrate that the U.S. was not united during this time and states acted independently from the federal government and each…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the Articles of Confederation, Congress was a single house in which each state had one vote. Even though each state could have two to seven members representing them in congress. Congress could conduct foreign affairs, make treaties, and maintain an army and navy, and borrow and print money. But the big flaw was the Congress could not collect taxes or enforce laws directly. The states had the power to tax and enforce its own laws.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “On July 16, the convention adopted the Great compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no constitution” ( ). Which also led to the development of the legislative structure, a long term effect of the Great Compromise. The Legislative structure was a bicameral legislature. This bicameral legislature consists of a senate in which the representation of states is equal and it also consisted of a House of Representatives in which representation was based on population in addition to 3/5ths of the slave population.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Weakness of the Article of Confederation During the course of the Second Continental Congress in 1777, the Articles of Confederation were adopted for the proposal of a central institution. This meeting started in 1775, gathered many of the most brilliant minds of that period at Pennsylvania. Delegates were sent from the thirteen colonies to represent in the convention. The convention was a series of meeting, on the attempt to solve political and social issues. One of the major concern was the concept of distribution in power.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The History of the Constitutional Convention In 1787, Congress realized that states governing themselves would leave the nation powerless when faced with another war. The United States had adopted the Articles of Confederation a decade prior, but the system wasn’t working. Each state was able to govern itself, and they didn’t have to abide by any regulations set by the federal government. The United States has a federalist government, meaning that the citizens are held to the laws of the state and the nation, but the federal government was left nearly powerless to enforce any type of authority. Congress had no way of being able to regulate commerce and no authority to emplace taxes.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays