Kant's Theory Strengths And Weaknesses

Improved Essays
Moral philosophy tries to explain the difference between right and wrong so that people can make good decisions. However, finding out what makes an action right is not so easy. For this reason, several different theories have evolved while trying to explain this issue. One of those theories is deontology, or duty-defined morality. Probably the most famous and influential spokesman of this theory is Immanuel Kant. His ideas, especially in contrast to utilitarianism, give a compelling explanation of why rights violations are wrong. However, in this paper I am going to argue that despite the impact Kant’s theory has made, there are still some weaknesses that should be noted. To begin with, in his “Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of …show more content…
First, this theory puts too much emphasis on rationality ignoring the role of feelings. It is difficult to imagine how Kant’s theory could be applied in real life since people are emotional beings and thus reason alone is rarely enough to motivate their actions. For instance, it is unlikely that a robber who repeatedly commits the crimes would care much about being immoral even if he or she knows that stealing is wrong. This suggests that something else is needed in addition to reason to encourage moral behavior. Moreover, if a person were determined to end his or her life, the duty to preserve it, which, according to Kantian ethics, is a must, would hardly stop the person from actually committing a suicide. However, if he or she starts thinking about how much pain that action would bring to others, the feelings of affection could change his or her mind and thus motivate one to refuse to commit suicide. For Kant, this would not be a moral thing to do, as the decision not to kill oneself would be based on inclination and not on duty. Yet, in my opinion, this makes Kant’s idea contradictory since the most important thing should not be the means but the result, which in this situation is preserving …show more content…
Yet, despite its influence, Kantian ethics seems to have several weaknesses. First, since people are emotional beings, reason and rationality is usually not enough to motivate them act morally. Another weakness is that Kant’s categorical imperative allows for much mistreatment of animals that should not be considered morally right. Therefore, although Kantian ethics provides many strong arguments, one should always critically evaluate the ideas that are presented, especially when it deals with such a subtle and controversial issue as

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Universal Law Case Study

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Explanation of Kant’s 4 Cases FIRST CASE: A person with many problems is tired of life. However, his reason is still intact that he can inquire himself about the possibility to commit suicide. Next, he asks himself if his action could become a universal law of nature, meaning other people in the same situation will follow the same rule. His rule of conduct states that because staying alive will bring more harm than contentment, and because he loves himself, he decided to take his own life.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the book, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant lays out his theory for making moral decisions. Unlike many other philosophers, Kant focuses not on the consequences of actions, but on the maxim in which the action was performed; in addition, Kant also tries to find his moral theory a priori instead of through empirical experience. He attempts to formulate a theory grounded through pure reason in which he bases his moral law on something that has never been experienced before that we are able to imagine and strive towards. Kant’s theory circles around the idea of a Supreme Principle of Morality called the Categorical Imperative which encompasses the Formula of Universal Law and the Formula of Humanity; all of which I will…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is here that Kant’s rationale for making choices, as well as morality, can be…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s basis for “Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals” is an objective view into how and why decisions are made among rational beings for the furtherance of their and society’s wellbeing. Through his view in the 1700’s we can see how much of a scientific stance Kant took in journalizing his analyzation of his own and society’s morals. Kant lists five “formulations” that are involved in rational decision-making. Rational beings have utilized the “Categorical Imperative” to shape today’s society by way of relationships and treatises. These formulations give rational beings an expanded view of the many faces of the Categorical Imperative.…

    • 1856 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s Moral Theory is widely studied in philosophy and the field of ethics. In his theory, Kant expresses the ways to determine the morality of an action: examining the intentions behind the action in question is most important instead of merely considering the consequences. Moral actions, he explains, must have the intention of being consistent with duty for the sake of duty and doing the right thing; they cannot be motivated by any inclinations. Actions inconsistent with duty would be, for example, lying, cheating, stealing, or breaking a promise. These actions could never be moral in any case since they defy the honesty of duty.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The “summum bonum” is an ancient Latin expression which was introduced by the Roman philosopher Cicero, meaning “the highest good.” The old proverb is often used when answering the question of what makes for a meaningful life. In Immanuel Kant’s Religion Within the Boundaries of Bare Reason, he reasserts this “highest good” and describes it as “happiness proportioned to virtue.” Kantian philosophy rationally endorses the “highest good” of humanity, which cannot be fully attained in this world. This is an eternal good found in a “supremely powerful moral ruler capable of uniting virtue and happiness,” namely, God.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s impact on Western thought is undoubtedly profound. Being one of the most distinguished figures of the German Idealist movement of the late 18th and early 19th centuries, Kant’s work has set a precedent that, to this day, deeply influences our understanding of ethical discussion, political philosophy, and human cognition. Kant’s multiple contributions still are subject of debate; although, it is his Categorical Imperative that gathers the most attention, discourse, and controversy. Being a reaction to the subjectivity of his era, the Categorical Imperative provides an objective and infallible guideline for universal moral behavior, that stipulates one’s actions should not be dependent on ulterior motives and in consideration that the act itself will become universally accepted, ergo, if one were to steal then one should also be accepting of…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deontology is what is right based on one’s duty or obligation. He then goes on to detail what the basis for morality is not. I believe this is important because it is often seen that philosophers give their side and then do not tell you what it is not. Kant draws the conclusion that one should pick their ends and then chose their means, this is not the basis of morality. If one cannot choose their own end then they must rely on the categorical imperatives.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This paper analyzes three different moral theories: Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative, John Stuart Mill’s utilitarianism, and Kwame Appiah’s cosmopolitanism. After a short description of each theory, the question of whether or not it is morally right to vaccinate children against bad diseases such as measles and mumps is asked of each of them. Immanuel Kant’s Categorical Imperative The distinction between two kinds of imperatives – those that provide instruction for attaining a specific goal and those that apply regardless of one's goal – is at the core of Kant's moral theory. The latter are called categorical imperatives, and they are to be followed at all…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant an 18th century German philosopher considered rather notable for his work in ethical philosophy. Kant was responsible for the book Groundwork of Metaphysics of Morality and his work remains relevant today as a crucial ‘part of Western Moral Philosophy’. Kant argues that reason is what predisposes what is right. Kant believed that religion should not be taken into consideration when determining what is morally right. Kant’s reasoning of this is explained that if one only gaged what is right based on religion this would not result in a ‘supreme principle of morality’ for all people.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For many years there has been a debate between the opposing philosophical frameworks consequentialism and deontology. Some could argue that consequentialisms maxim of "the ends justify the means” as the determinant for a moral action may be inconsistent with other important aspects of value such as rights and allegiance. Others may argue that deontology is simply too restrictive and independent of the context in which it could be applied to. Although these two philosophical frameworks have various pros and cons associated with them, I will argue that consequentialism is the most flexible of the two frameworks. Consequentialism portrays right action in terms of intrinsic value, stating that the “action is right if…its consequences would be…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are considered founders of Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory where moral rightness is measured by what brings the most happiness to the most people. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism because it is based on whether an action is morally justified by its consequences. Bentham and Mill differ in that Bentham reasoned that pleasure was measurable using hedons, units of pleasure, where actions with the highest score were the best action.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Next, we will define the categorical imperative and apply it to this ethical dilemma. The Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals starts by making the distinction between “pure” and “empirical” philosophy. According to Kant, “metaphysics” or pure philosophy is based on a priori concepts. A priori concepts are independent of experience or observations. Empirical or a posteriori concepts, on the other hand, are dependent on experience of the world and specific circumstances.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consequentialism and deontology are contrasting theories of philosophy that guide us in viewing acts in terms of their morality. The doctrine of consequentialism suggests we should judge the morality of actions purely on the results they produce; whereas deontology aims to judge morality based on the conduct of an individual, and morality is decided from the moral acceptance of a particular action rather than the result the decision produces. These principles of philosophy have existed for thousands of years, with many philosophers throughout history using them as a basis for their work. In the context of an ethical situation, we can thoroughly use these ideologies as instruments to determine an effective solution to prevent a harmful dilemma;…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays