He quotes Rushdie several times and then states his own beliefs in similar ways. As Rushdie believes that migration brings diversity, Sanders believes that this brings destruction. The rhetorical question in lines 40-42 condemns the group of people who do migrate, and then criticizes the audience's ethics and humanity's ability to destroy the environment and then simply move on without remorse. He uses this device to question humans selfish ideas and values imposing on new land and help rid of its occurrence. Through the evaluation of ethos, the author displays pathos by also instilling guilt into the reader’s emotions. He questions what we lose by uprooting ourselves, and this applies to all humans who have ever moved rather than staying in one
He quotes Rushdie several times and then states his own beliefs in similar ways. As Rushdie believes that migration brings diversity, Sanders believes that this brings destruction. The rhetorical question in lines 40-42 condemns the group of people who do migrate, and then criticizes the audience's ethics and humanity's ability to destroy the environment and then simply move on without remorse. He uses this device to question humans selfish ideas and values imposing on new land and help rid of its occurrence. Through the evaluation of ethos, the author displays pathos by also instilling guilt into the reader’s emotions. He questions what we lose by uprooting ourselves, and this applies to all humans who have ever moved rather than staying in one