Conclusion
There is sufficient evidence to conceive that the three Synoptic and New Testament authors depended on early authors for the selective information that they have composed in all the major parts of their Gospels. Some Christian’s fearfulness that “source criticism” for some reason calls for a conclusion that the Gospels cannot be trusted or were not Spirit-inspired is ungrounded. Source criticism cannot present that the first chronicles of the various components of Jesus’ life history were completely dependable, but it can propose that those accounts grew in a time and place in which many that had personally experienced Jesus while he was still alive. The theory of keeping authentic information was certainly present. Whether or not
There is sufficient evidence to conceive that the three Synoptic and New Testament authors depended on early authors for the selective information that they have composed in all the major parts of their Gospels. Some Christian’s fearfulness that “source criticism” for some reason calls for a conclusion that the Gospels cannot be trusted or were not Spirit-inspired is ungrounded. Source criticism cannot present that the first chronicles of the various components of Jesus’ life history were completely dependable, but it can propose that those accounts grew in a time and place in which many that had personally experienced Jesus while he was still alive. The theory of keeping authentic information was certainly present. Whether or not