Socrates Argument Essay

Improved Essays
There's not really a moment in time where I'm not evaluating my views: politically and philosophically. Growing up while observing the views the world offers, only makes me question them to get a better understanding of each and every different perspective. Within the philosophical branches of metaphysics, epistemology, and axiology, I've observed that I have no absolute answer to the questions that are asked. I have ideas but, are those really answers? With my own skepticism, I've compared myself to the famous Greek philosopher: Socrates. This essay would be my explanation of my positions, how I can relate it to Socrates, and how I question the world's different perspective.
Unquestionably, I stand a very little position of empiricism; I do believe that knowledge can derive from experience. However, I also believe that knowledge, wisdom, and truth can be achieved by admitting ignorance and succumbing to an absence of one's ego can unlock an access of truth and wisdom. This is where my skepticism plays a role in. One's view can be less biased and more open-minded this way. Having an open-mind and good morals can be a way of having a less worrisome and/or troublesome life. This would be part of my axiological views, the other half being of a more idealist perspective. I
…show more content…
I love knowing this because, with an open-mind you can learn and construct different ideas from the different perspectives. No one (or at least I assume) has one philosophical position on any issue that is questioned. Be that as it may, most axiological views are the same: good morals leads to happiness. No matter what religion or skepticism one may have, this idea is widely known among the world despite being stated in different ways. Again, this differ from the world view of epistemological and metaphysical ideas. I do not know if a majority or a few people would stand with me on those positions; one does not have the knowledge to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Socrates applies a rhetoric called elenchus that counters the popular Sophist rhetoric of the time. Elenchus introduces a method of debate based on utilizing questions and answers that inspire analytical thinking and tests the credibility of the opponent’s prior dialogue. In short, Socrates continuously “investigate[s] the question” (Line 348a). Socrates himself never explicitly states his opinion, but simply restates the declarations of the three interlocutors: Cephalus, Polymarchus, and Thrasymarchus. Socrates largely bases his arguments on his ability to accurately recall statements from earlier in the conversation.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I aim to present both the Cyclical and Recollection arguments proposed by Socrates in the Phaedo, to prove the immortality of the soul. I will discuss the criticisms of the first to demonstrate its fallibility as an account for the soul’s immortality. The weaknesses of the second argument will also be mentioned. In evaluating which of the arguments better proves the soul’s immortality, the responses to the criticisms of the Recollection theory will indicate why it holds as the prominent argument over the Cyclical.…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Crito, Socrates argues that it would be morally impermissible for him to escape jail and evade execution, despite being expected to, because he has made a just agreement being choosing to live in Athens to follow its rules. He argues that if one chooses to stay in a city, one can try to persuade the government to change its laws or it must obey them, even if they are unjust laws. Socrates’ argument shows that he would be an ardent opponent of Dr. Martin Luther King’s civil disobedience and subsequent defense of these actions. Yet, Socrates’s argument is flawed and cannot withstand examination, specifically regarding the prima facie duty to sometimes break just agreements. King did not act in a morally impermissible way when he broke the segregation laws of Birmingham because, in fact, he had a moral obligation to break these unjust laws.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cassondra Britton A Modern Day Socrates: Bob Ross Socrates was a classical Greek philosopher who is considered one of the founders of Western philosophy. A man who was too progressive for his time, Socrates’ radical ideas, such as the rejection of materialistic society, challenged those whose wealth shielded them from the masses. This progressive man defied common beliefs, and confronted those who held those beliefs. An unexpected teacher of many, Socrates was a visionary whose ideas challenged the status quo and social structure of society.…

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the fateful trial where Socrates in unjustly condemned to death, his friend Crito appears with the desire to help him escape, upon awakening Socrates makes several arguments where he tries to persuade his friend Crito not to escape his cell, Socrates and Crito argues that the escape Would be unjust because he wouldn’t oppose the laws of Athens that protected his parents and raised him from a child, although he considered the decision that sentenced him to death unjust, he considers that the escape would not benefit his friends or his children, He would leave them orphans and themselves committed to the laws and justice of Athens, which would be unfair to them. With these arguments, Socrates shows Crito the responsibility that would lead…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socratic questioning could tear apart everything that you think you know. In the Platonic Dialogue Laches, Socrates completely dismantles what the distinguished Athenian generals, Laches and Nicias, think courage is. Socrates asks them “what is that common quality, which is the same in all these cases, and which is called courage?” (Plato, 191e) This quote from Socrates is relevant for the fact that Socrates is asking for something more than just a description, which partially defines courage.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Striving For The Truth: An Academic Essay on Socrates Dialogue and How it Relates to Contemporary Education SITI SARAH BINTE NUR SAIDY BACHELOR SCIENCE OF EDUCATION AY14/15 AED 105-CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES OF EDUCATION TUTORIAL GROUP 12 TRAVINAH KAHNG Sarah Nur Saidy 1 Over the last millenium, education has been greatly influenced and developed through historical formation. From different eras, countries and cultures, it has come to an agreement that knowledge is vital in ones life. In this context, Socrates a renowned Greek Teacher and Western philosopher believed in developing ones…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socrates starts to examine the second argument after examining the first argument. Crito stated that it is unjust for Socrates to stay in the prison with having an opportunity to escaping the prison. In respond, Socrates said: “We should examine whether or not it would be just for me to try to get out of here when the Athenians haven’t acquitted me.” (67) Socrates strategy in any argument is examining and questioning, and he would look for any contradiction in the argument. Socrates explained that justice person should never do injustice in any circumstances (68).…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will argue that Socrates argument that the tyrant will be unhappy is convincing. First, I will explain how the tyrant exemplifies injustice. Then I will explain the consequences for the tyrant of his soul. Then I will analyze Socrates argument to develop a clear and evaluation that supports my thesis.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Persuasion

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Socrates Persuades Glaucon by telling him it will not be hard for them to descend and is the right thing to do. Socrates wants to reassure Glaucon that “ there is no injustice” to tell the enlightened to descend into the “ general underground abode.” Socrates goes on to imply that descension is to “ have a care and providence”. Socrates here is saying many things: it is not wrong to tell philosophers to descend, it will be easy to compel them to descend, and third, he is in a sense guilt-tripping Glaucon and the philosophers.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crito: My Argument With Socrates I would first like to start my argument with capitulation; for I do not believe that Socrates, at the heart of his argument, was wrong. Although my knowledge of that heart may be false, thus so may my beliefs, I must still put in the effort and play my role as devil’s advocates by trying to convince a long dead man to do something I believe would have been wrong. My first argument with Socrates is whether he ever truly intended to be swayed, or if his mind had already been closed to the matter.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Justification

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates, or the man that Plato wrote him out to be throughout several dialogues, had not believed in the ‘law of retaliation’; he did not consider it to be just to break a law even if the reason for doing so was because he was initially wronged. This reasoning can be disputed by saying that a citizen could have justification for civil disobedience if the law was unjust to begin with. Socrates, taking on the personification as the Laws could reply to this objection by stating that a citizen is free to leave the country if their moral beliefs (moral relativism) disconnect from the laws, but that if they do stay then it is implied that it is imperative that they follow all laws of the land. In my personal viewpoint, this is not a sufficient…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Athenian Democracy Essay

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The development of Athenian democracy was influenced by complex social, economic, and military issues, not to mention the obvious political aspect. However, even among these complex set of factors, one aspect in the development of Athenian democracy that stands out and affects all three sets of issues is warfare. Warfare was a constant in ancient Greece, and indeed most of the ancient world. City-states constantly fought, mostly against each other, though they would often band together against outside threats such as the Persians. The Greek style of warfare also tended to be fairly homogenous throughout the city-states as well, with an infantry formed from hoplites, and in the fifth century and later, a navy.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Socrates

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates argument In the apology book Socrates have many accusers. Now he is accused of corrupting the youth but He is denying the allegations he is saying that he could not intentionally corrupt anyone. Some people are convinced that he is speaking the truth but some people thing that he is lying.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Right or Wrong, Win In society it is believed that is impossible for one person to corrupt the thoughts of a whole group of people. On the other hand, it has been proved that it is possible for one person to influence and subsequently lead to the corruption of thoughts. Following Socrates’ death, we the Athenians became inspired to ferret out and execute other individuals who might be guilty of corrupting our youth. One of the individuals we will put on trial for this is Meletus, the youngest of the three prosecutors that accused Socrates of this matter.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays