Mainly, in this essay the writer talks all the thing about sociology looking through the perspective of a sociological eye. The sociological eye is a unique in its own. More or less the discipline of a sociology always exists. It sometimes come and sometimes goes out. Almost everything is bounded by something in this world and the process is called hybrid. And giving an example of a hybrid the writers tell that the forming communities have been split up in today’s world. But there is nothing called loss in life. Sociology is simply a product of a history. In this world, almost everything is surrounded by a sociology. Everyone turn on its sociological eye for …show more content…
Between the two sources of a sociologist if we ever have to choose between any one of them we certainly have to choose a sociological eye. Because if a sociological eye is lost then everything is lost. Without a sociological eye a sociologist loses its importance in the society. And similarly without it a sociologist cannot even convience the whole public. We can see that all the thing that we saw from a sociological eye is reveal through Anderson’s book. We can also expand other visions through a sociological eye. Thus, a sociology can be fascinating for some reason then it can also be frustrating for the same reason. To sum up, being a sociologist one can poses a unique character in the society as well as the whole