1. Message from Leadership: Acting Secretary of Army made emphasis on engaged leaders and proactive risk management provide the foundation to support safety and capability wherever the mission dictates. 2. Previous Safety Council Minutes: RTI Elevator…
SNC failed to utilize tools given to him and had to be…
SNC stood at the front of the obstacle unable to develop and execute any sort of plan. SNC continued…
SNC attempted to operate in a non-tactical setting by having the fire team step off in condition four. SNC was reminded by a fellow candidate to go to condition…
During the execution phase of his assault SNC maintained good control while patrolling but once they took a casualty SNC posted himself on that casualty to take care of and sent his teams forward to advance on the enemy. Eventually his team members were advancing without guidance from their team leader, so he…
Candidate Shankling demonstrated an understanding of the five paragraph order. SNC initially struggled with his confidence during the brief, but was able to follow the format and make sense of the order. SNC developed a plan prior to giving his order and was able to assign tasks for security set up. SNC was able to maintain control of his fire team throughout the mission due to the position he had placed himself which allowed him to eventually recognize the need to re-position the team as needed. He hesitated for a brief second which showed that SNC might have been afraid to make a decision by asking for a volunteer to mount to plank and execute the obstacle.…
SNC delivered an incomplete five paragraph order. SNC completely forgot to include the execution and skipped right into the administration and logistics paragraph. SNC voice structure did not sound confident in the orders that were being instructed; however SNC did state accurate information. SNC did develop an initial plan prior to starting the execution. SNC did have to rely on others in his fire team in which one of the fire team members had to inform the fire team leader of the command signals to use.…
Candidate Kearney delivered a complete and sequential five paragraph order. He displayed a very thorough understanding of the OSMEAC format as he briefed his fire team without the use of a template and maximized eye contact with is subordinates. His calm demeanor instilled confidence in his fire team to aggressively move to and act on the objective. During the execution phase, SNC maintained full control of his fire team's movement. He was cognizant of their formations as he moved them from a column to a wedge for more situational awareness, and to finally to skirmishers for maximum fire on the objective.…
2. SNC showed no sense of urgency from start to finish and this was reflected in her team’s performance. During her brief SNC did not accurately brief the execution stating that they are to destroy the hide sight. SNC was briefed to destroy the enemy to prevent a hide sight from being established. SNC did not maintain control of her team once they began to receive contact.…
7. SNC gave a great five paragraph order it was very detailed and straight to the point. SNC clearly articulated what he expected from each member of his fire team and assigned each member a task. SNC did lack a sense of urgency throughout the entire evolution that slowed down the progression of the mission. SNC was able to maintain great control of his fire team through decisive decision making during the execution.…
SNC maintain focus throughout the mission and acted in a tactical manner, however…
The means by which the Command was structured was very confusing and caused a plethora of communication discrepancies. At one point, a Navy SEAL commander cut his radio off to completely shut off the direction of an Army commander. Because of this, that Army commander could not warn this Navy commander and his SEALs of possible enemy activity in their proposed insertion point. This led to a very unfortunate incident in which a SEAL’s life and an Army aircraft were lost.…
Following directions in the military in certain situations can be life or death, if not followed correctly. Certain jobs like, the infantry or the artillery, following directions is very important and vital for mission success. If one person doesn’t do their part then it could lead to the potential mission failure but a mistake that will be difficult for everyone to bear with the death of a comrade. Infantry for example relies on squad cohesion and total discipline with the task at hand. Training is important for an infantryman.…
Without communication, order and instruction cannot be disseminated effectively to lower ranked officials and soldiers. Communication refers to the exchange of expressions, thoughts, and information; it is an imperative aspect of army teams, units, individuals, and departments and is important to efficient and successful mission accomplishment. Hence, through effective communication Army members incessantly promote the process of gaining relevant clarification and problem solving. Consequently, the lack of proper communication results in an unsuccessful mission, which demonstrates the significance of effective channel of communication and the entire process between subordinates and leaders and vice versa in the realization of mission…
The Vigilance Project Case (Dominick, 2008) is about team conflict because, in reality, the entire project was founded on some sort of conflict. The merger wasn’t really a merger, but more of an acquisition, which instantly creates tensions between the employees of both companies as various roles are either increased or decreased, depending on which company you initially worked for. As subteams were formed and sponsors/leads assigned to each subteam, initially it sounds like a good idea. It flattens out the hierarchy and involves plenty of employees in the decision-making process. However, because of the location of teams, it may have created a larger problem, producing more conflict, as now communication is becoming a bigger-than-initially-thought…