Slavery In John Adams Reflection On The Missouri Question

Improved Essays
In John Adams’ Reflection on the Missouri Question, Adam identifies the true motivation behind the expansion of slavery. Adam mentions that it is agreeable that slavery is an evil practice. Along with that statement, Adam points out that the practice of slavery is contradicting to their independence from Great Britain for freedom. Adam identifies the true motivation of expanding slavery is due to people’s soul pride and continue in their condition of being a master. It is not for labor that they want to expand slavery. Instead, it is the feeling of superiority By expanding slavery, they have the opportunity to own more slaves, which could make them feel better about themselves, how they are in a better position than others and have power in …show more content…
In John Adams’ Reflection on the Missouri Question, Adam observed the growing division between the northern and southern states regarding the issue of slavery. Some of the observations were that the northern states were supportive of the abolition of slavery, while the southern states were against the idea of abolishing slavery. This is likely because the southern states living are highly depended on farming, and farming requires a lot of labor. As for the northerners, they focus more on the issue of freedom as opposed to labor. In the northerners’ opinion, the idea of slavery is going against the idea of freedom. In addition, the northern states argued that Missouri should not be a slave state, while the southern states supported Missouri as a slave state. Another observation, Adam notices were that there was this division between the northern states(free side) and southern states (slave side) in regard to the power of Congress. While the free side said that it was Congress’ responsibility to stop more slaves coming into the …show more content…
Trollope supports her statement by mentioning the portraits of Indian chiefs who came to negotiate with the president, how they all had on a similar expression, either warlike daring or gentle, but at the end were treated by the most oppressive act of our great father (founding fathers). Trollope also mentions how she had heard statements from the Americans themselves of the unhappy experience with the Indians, representing themselves as treacherous and false beyond their beliefs. The Americans define freedom and liberty as everyone being treated equally with their unalienable rights, and freedom for one to do what they want. But the treatment of Indians and other non-white people showed that America’s practices are contradicting with their principles. On the one hand, telling people that America grants equality to everyone, and on the other hand, the American society is largely depended on slaves. In addition, they said that everyone has freedom in this country, while slaves are forbidden to do many things, and are often treated

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Slavery and Westward Expansion had a very volatile relationship in the Antebellum era America and would contribute to the American Civil War. Westward expansion and the Missouri Compromise of 1820 would be a way to preserve unity within the Union, but over the next 30 years, ties between the Northern and Southern states would be strained as more territory is gained and the question regarding slavery’s place within these new lands. Through an analysis of book and article sources, one gains the idea that Westward expansion, slavery, and the place of Africans and their rights would continue to tear away at the union until it was ripped apart when South Carolina secedes from the Union and is followed by six more states after the election of President…

    • 1096 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an era where slavery was viewed as a profitable and reputable source of wealth, income, power, and an economic driving force, divisions amongst opinions added fuel to the flame for an unavoidable conflict to ignite. The Missouri Compromise came about for views, even within a time with which like-mindedness was prized and raised to the highest of glories on a pedestal, vastly varied on the issue of slavery and its seemingly rather loosely tied boundaries. With two opposing sides, the North for the removal of slavery and the South in favor of its continued existence -- territorial issues were heavy on the mind. Though often revered as being a more verbal form of compromise that laid out specific boundaries within the states, or two states…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Constitution Dbq

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Constitution is the one document that essentially holds the nation together. It defines what is and is not permissible under the law of the land — it IS the law of the land. Being that slavery was a major problem during the nineteenth century (and late eighteenth century), it was only natural that historians turn towards the dogma of the United States. Although historians had different interpretations, there is only one that seemed logical and had substance. The forefathers of America whom wrote the constitution intended for it to offer protection for the institution of slavery (in other words, it was pro-slavery) because they, themselves, were slaveowners and made no conscious effort to eradicate slavery even though they had to opportunity…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the Articles of Confederation, written in 1777, the United States of America was in dire need of a strong centralized power and a more structured government. 55 delegates rallied to this need and started the Philadelphia Convention, where the motive was to form a better government that would meet the needs of its people. With this motive in mind, the Constitution of the United States was drafted, but there was still a long road till it was signed into law in 1788. In order to make the Constitution legitimate, it would need to be ratified by all 13 states. Combining all the needs of each colony was an intricate compromise, but it was these compromises that made it acceptable by so many.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Long-Term Effects Of Slavery

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Northerners and Southerners expressed entirely different views of the American Promise and the place of slavery within it. These differences crystallized into political form when David Wilmot proposed banning slavery in any territory won in the Mexican-American War. When Wilmot proposed and submitted his amendment, he did not foresee that the debate he unleashed would end up in Civil war just fifteen years later. A lot of controversies spurred up, and congress attempted to address these issues with the Compromise of 1850, but the fugitive Slave Act and the publication of Uncle Tom’s Cabin hardened northern sentiments against slavery an confirmed southern suspicions of northern ill will. Americans could no longer continue its journey as a nation half slave and half free.…

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Founding Brothers tried not to ignore the slavery problem, a practice which began in the New World long before the American Revolution. Slaves were jfirst brought to America in 1619 to help with agriculture. When the American Revolution came a century and a half later, it gave Americans a new opportunity change. The majority of the Founding Brothers were against repeal of slavery because they believed that abolishment would lead to emancipation of the southern states or even civil war.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In John Adams’ Reflection on the Missouri Question, Adam identifies the true motivation behind the expansion of slavery. Adam mentions that it is agreeable that slavery is an evil practice. Along with that statement, Adam points out that the practice of slavery is contradicting to their independence from Great Britain for freedom. Adam identifies the true motivation of expanding slavery is due to people’s soul pride and continue in their condition of masterdom. It is not for labor that they want to expand slavery.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is very difficult for a man to demand his own liberty, but not the liberty of the person standing next to him. All the arguments put forth for their independence were available to enslaved blacks, embattled Indians, and women. The hypocrisy of denying them rights became ever more apparent. Most blatantly, as Nash pointed out, in the correspondences between John and Abigail Adams. In 1776, Abigail wrote, “[We] will not hold ourselves bound by any laws in which we have no voice or representation.”…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Years after writing the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson still appeared to be determined in his quest for the abolishment of slavery in the United States. As governor of Virginia in 1779, he took steps toward what he called the “Final Eradication” of slavery. He proposed a bill that would “Emancipate all slaves born after passing the act”, but it was ultimately voted down in the state legislature. (Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia; Query 14 The Administration of Justice and Description of the Laws, P. 228, 1794) The piling amount of failures in his efforts to end slavery were beginning to take a toll on Jefferson.…

    • 2272 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I do not agree with this statement that anti-slavery should be treated only among them, but rather it should be treated with all the people and not only among the committees, in order to give black slaves the freedom to expression and liberty. William Freehling also argues that there were escapes of slaves from one country to another, by the abuse that was given to them or simply by their freedom to a new world. The worst problem for the slave owners was that they were not located in a single place for the distribution of black slaves but in the whole region, causing slavery to grow more and more. William Freehling and his analysis with Thomas Jefferson of Virginia, a great slaver and author of the anti-slavery statement, believed that all men should rebel against their anti-republican horror, like slavery. Therefore he feared that the reactions of the slaves would disturb the white republics that the white republicans will liberate the blacks.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the late 18th century, the Constitution of the United States was ratified and the unification of the union along with it. Although the Constitution was created to produce order and unity, the nation was split into two by the mid-19th century. After a vast amount of territories being brought into the union due to the nation 's’ Manifest Destiny, the issue of slavery became the center of politics. The cause of such political and social chaos was the fact that the Constitution had not specifically addressed the issue of slavery and what was to be done about it. It’s consequences were that the nation had felt it’s repercussions years later.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Northerners were not the only ones willing to give slaves their freedom it was also the British! British was also willing to free slaves if they fought with them in their side in the war. But in the end the British nor Americans wanted slaves to win their freedom for a social change but just simply because they wanted to win the war. But surprisingly a lot of the founding fathers did not agree with slavery but did not want to abolish it at the time because it seemed too radical to do then. One of the founding fathers who did not agree with slavery was Alexander Hamilton because he realized that the slaves wanted to be free and independent just like the Americans wanted to be free and independent from Great Britain.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the book of James Oakes, ‘’The Scorpion’s Sting” anti-slavery before the war he has stated in brief chapters that of abolitionism and politics on anti-slavery. The Scorpion’s sting argues constructively with Republicans of them committing destruction of slavery inside the United States as the policy of the federal institution felt that it was necessary to, but the institution were wrong as that policy was a mistake for their own insecurity. Oakes tells us of the Republicans efforts failed shortly claiming of the radical policy to emancipate the military, but just as important to ending slavery, if not on a precise manner that architects might see. Oakes took the Scorpion Sting to his theory that Republicans threat to slavery wills eve…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    By reducing the rights of slaves and giving an overwhelming majority of power to the southern states in the House of Representatives through the three-fifths clause, it has become clear that the early American viewpoint was that we needed to keep slavery for as long as we can. As slave labor being the number one source of plantation workers in the south, by removing them entirely, the income once obtained by these landowners would be decreased siverly, and the north knew it. By removing slavery from the early American lifestyle, the economic boost we were going through would drastically decrease from where they…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Edmund Morgan, an American historian and a previous history professor at Yale University, unveils how slavery was able to exist in America while liberty was held at the highest of standards in his journal Slavery and Freedom: The American Paradox. After sifting through the stories of our nations founding fathers and most important men of the American Revolution his discovers that, unlike most other historians, the fopaux we call slavery did not begin as a racist act. Morgan also discovered that while many write off the founding fathers and the original colonists as hypocrites for wanting to live in a free world while depriving others of their liberty that’s not an accurate name to describe them. And throughout Slavery and Freedom: The American Paradox Edmund Morgan explains his realization with the world.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays