Single Member Plurality And Opportional Voting

Improved Essays
The two distinctive types of electoral system, single member plurality and proportional representation, are adopted differently and implement distinctive methods. Voters in a single member plurality election can vote for only one candidate. The candidate that collects the most votes wins. This system is also identified as “ first past the post”(FPTP) system .As any other plurality-majority electoral system, this system is defended and supported because of its simplicity. The United Kingdom is an excellent example of a country that employs the single-member plurality system. It is separated into 650 constituencies, each returning one Member of Parliament to the House of Commons. Within each constituency the candidate winning the most votes,

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    An electoral reform is a change in the electoral system of a country in order to improve how public desires are expressed in an election. An electoral reform is necessary for Canada’s democracy in the 21st century since the current system does not accurately represent people’s choice. By analyzing the pros and cons from the different recommendations on proportional representation (PR), I will prove how this new electoral system is a better option for Canadians over the current one, first-past-the-post (FPTP). Background…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With redistricting, gerrymandering, cracking, and stacking, how can we choose our representatives? When clearly, they choose us, even before we vote. Redistricting is the process of redrawing electoral districts boundaries, often in response to population changes during census. Every state has its own standard of redistricting that complies with federal requirements to equalize the population, but it creates gerrymandering.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Super Majority

    • 1115 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Discuss the ways in which the American government requires a “super majority”. A super majority vote is a vote that must exceed the number of votes made for a simple majority. One way to put it is that if there is a 100 members of congress, the vote required to when the super majority is 51. Super majority votes are most often applied to legislation that is dealing with the federal budget or taxation.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The single member plurality system (also known as, First-Past-The-Post) used in Canadian federal and provincial elections has been examined over several decades to have many strengths but also reveals serious shortcomings and limitations. Governments and parliaments are formed but not well backed by a majority of voters, splitting of votes, strategic voting and coordination failures result in some sort of a gap between the real preferences of Canadian voters and election results, new political parties, like the newly formed Green party, face huge challenges to compete in the political arena, minorities including aboriginals and females are underrepresented, politics of regionalism dominate, participation in politics from different…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The three government systems majority, coalition and minority all have their own limitations and benefits. A majority system is a single party where only one member is elected out of a constituency; [a specified area of voters who elect a person to represent them legislatively] the most adequate person should be elected to represent the constituency. This system is very common and they can do what they want to. It is easier to pass bills and do not have to worry about the opposition. The minority system consist of many different parties where that one party does not have more than 50% of the power.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of such downfalls is that electoral districts, one of the most essential parts of the voting system, have many flaws. Electoral districts are essential because each district has an election and the party that wins the most districts then wins the election. The first of such flaws is gerrymandering. The dictionary definition of gerrymandering is, “To divide [a geographic area] into voting districts in a way that gives one party an unfair advantage in elections” (“Gerrymandering”). The term gerrymandering was first coined in the 1800s when the governor of Massachusetts named Gerry changed the electoral districts purely to win an election.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The system distorts one-person , one-vote principle that our democratic country…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism In Canada

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Duverger has brought up that the single-member constituency system “accentuates the geographical localization of opinions: one might even say that it tends to transform a national opinion… into a local opinion by allowing it to be represented only in the sections of the country in which it is strongest.” Proportional representation works in the inverse way for conclusions firmly dug in locally have a tendency to be widened on to the national plane by the likelihood of being spoken to in districts where they are in a little minority. The political centrality of these contradicted propensities is clear: corresponding representation has a tendency to fortify national solidarity; the straightforward greater part system highlights neighborhood contrasts. The results are lucky or lamentable as indicated by the specific circumstance in every…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College Dbq

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are two different types of elections, a direct election, and a divided election (“Types of Voting Systems”). In a direct election, every voter’s vote counts as one. If a candidate receives a majority, or more than half, of the popular vote, then they would win. The voter’s vote would then count for one out of the total number of the population. In a divided election, the candidate needs to obtain a majority of votes, from the most states.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This system would be very different from the Electoral College system, being that it would wipe away the middle man between the people and the government. In this system, the people would cast their votes in a ranking system, ranking who they wanted at the top and their least favorite candidate last. This system gives the people a feel of importance when casting their vote because they know it will make a difference. If Americans changed the system to Direct Vote with Plurality rule, this would make Americans especially feel like each and everyone of their votes counted.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Voting System In Canada

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Our current representative democracy gives citizens the right to vote under a free electoral system. Frequently seen as right rather than an obligation, not all citizens take part in the election. Therefore, not making an appearance can dramatically effect our political system causing an unfair election. Other countries to avoid unfair democracy have obtained for compulsory voting; eg. Brazil, Australia and Austria.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Through elections and the democratic process, citizens get the chance to grant authority to individuals to represent them and their interests because of this, elections and the electoral process are the cornerstones of democracy. Fair and representative elections encourage the exchange of ideas and opinions and are crucial in establishing a relationship between the government and the citizens they represent. Since elections have and will continue to be the most vital aspect of democracy, the procedural steps of elections and the formula for electing representatives will also be important. Around the world, there are different types of electoral systems. Along with these systems come debate about if these electoral systems lead to governments that truly represent the values of the population.…

    • 1759 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Voters choose one preferred candidate, and they mark an X next to the person on a ballot paper. The one who gets the most number of votes wins representation of the constituency. So, it is easy to count the votes and clear to see who wins. However, the results tend to favor the major parties, i.e. the Labor Party and the Conservatives, and disadvantage minority ones. To illustrate, the Liberal Democrats Party had never won more than 62 votes before 2005.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every nation and country has a way of running itself; a way to govern what is considered lawful and unlawful. In the United States of American, there is a massive controversial debate about whether our democracy is majoritarian or if it is more pluralistic in nature. Some may argue that the mass public, or every citizen in the country, is able to control the government’s actions. Others will state that many groups are able to work together amongst themselves to be able to allow more involvement of the citizens in a majority of the nation’s decisions. Both of these ideas of how our government works are similar in ways as well as different in many other ways.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States and the United Kingdom’s system of choosing the leader of vary greatly in how the processes are done. But if one were to investigate and research further into the systems, one would find the fundamental processes are similar in which they operate with only a few key differences between the two electoral processes. One of the major differences between the United Kingdom and the United States is that in the UK citizens do not directly elect the leader of the country, they simply vote for members of parliament, and the party with the most seats in parliament usually has its leader selected by the Queen as its prime minister. (UK Parliament 2015) The difference between that process and the one present in the United States is that…

    • 2495 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays