Similarities Between Thomas And Hobbes

Thomas Aquinas holds that God provides the latest guidelines, but at the same time the man is created as an autonomous being capable of developing standards from the circumstances and characteristics of the times in which they live. In other words, the moral world is not fully formed by God; the man has basic moral principles that captures as participation in the rational order of creation, but freely build their daily lives. on the other hand, Hobbes believes that the existence of society, political power, laws, and institutions is artificial; the truly natural, fundamental truth, the starting point of systematic construction, is the individual. Hobbes says that the man call good and evil to what he subjetively finds it pleasant or annoying, respectively. It Advocates, consequently, a radical nominalism, meaning that good and evil are just words to name individual sensations. There is no objective reality behind those words, so that morality inevitably depends solely on subjective judgments. From that description, the man from the rational point of view appears as a radically individual being that only seeks to satisfy their holdings.
I personally am inclined to the theory and view of Thomas Aquinas. For Thomas Aquinas, …show more content…
Therefore, it is necessary to leave the state of nature once established the foundation of human life, that is, there's only independent individuals, it is necessary to build a consistent political society with such budgets. To make this work, Hobbes uses the concept of state of nature. He claims the existence of state of nature that are actually laws to achieve peace. natural law contained very basic and obvious moral precepts, of which no one doubted obligation. Instead, Hobbes conceives rather as technical rules that serve to an end, but not oblige because an obligation has to have some unconditioned