Democratic System Of Government

Improved Essays
This political study will define the democratic principles of federalism, presidentialism, and parliamentary sovereignty in a comparison and contrast of the governments in the United States and in England. In the United States, the concentration of presidential is a unique part o democratic institutions, which relies on the three branches of government as a balance of power. More so, U.S. president must govern through the federal governing apparatus, which controls his power through the judicial branch and the Congress. In a similar form of Congressional democracy, the British system of governing relies on the parliamentary sovereignty of the legislative body to make governing decisions. However, Britain does not utilize a presidential system …show more content…
The federal government acts as a supreme authority of the land, which formed around the tri-parte system of checks and balances found in the presidency, judiciary, and the Congress. In contrast to the overriding authority of the British parliamentary system, the American government relies on the three branches to make critical decisions as an authority over the states. In comparison, however, Great Britain relies heavily on a legislative body in which decision are made through a federated system of governance. In the U.S., the Congress wields the same type of representational governing authority, which is not dissimilar from the methods used in the party system in British government. These are the territorial divisions of government, which makes Great Britain and the U.S. a type of federalized form of democracy: “Although some dispersal of power across territorial and/or functional units is characteristic of all democracies” (Schmitter and Karl 84). This type of federal system is prominent in the U.S. and in Britain, yet they show variable levels of territorial control based on how decisions are made through a legislative body. Therefore, the issue of accountability in various constituencies defines the role of geographical location in the use of a centralized form of democratic government. Britain and the U.S. share …show more content…
The similarities of federalism and parliamentary sovereignty in the U.S. and Britain are founded on the power of the legislative body to the representational and territorial facts of democratic institutions. More so, the ability of the U.S. federal government as a “checks and balances” system provides a similar use of parliamentary power in the Congress. However, the U.S. relies more heavily on a tri-parte system of legislative government, which allows a certain concentration of war powers through presidentialism. These factors define the overarching power of the American presidency, which makes the president and the Congress accountable for their actions. In a contrasting way, the British parliament does not allow the same powers to the Prime Minister or The Queen as means of accountability in the governing process. In these the principles, it is important to know the similarities and differences of governing democracies, which illustrate the centralization of power as apart of these transatlantic institutions. The United States and Britain share a great many democratic traditions in governing, but they have differing ways in which an authoritarian governance is still evident in the presidentialism and monarchical connections to these institutions. The factors of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Summary Kee and Shannon (1992) offer a historical analysis to explain the changes in power and responsibility of the state/local government and the federal government. They examine the following three historical periods of federalism to understand the shifting eras of power between the fifty states and the United States capitol. 1.The 1789-1932 era: the federal government’s domestic role was limited and states were fiscally stronger and had a large degree of autonomy (Kee & Shannon, 1992).…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The constitution guards against tyranny (a form of government where the leader or leaders have absolute dictatorship over their people or domain) in many ways, some of which including the concepts of federalism, checks and balances, and the separation of powers. Federalism is the idea that state and federal government should be separated; each should have its own freestanding laws and obligations that are applicable with the overall structure of the constitution. Checks and balances is the concept that each separate branch of government should ‘check’ on one another to keep the system in ‘balance’. Finally, the separation of powers is the idea that there should be separate branches of government, including the legislative, executive, and judicial…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While creating our government, the United States’ founding fathers created a democratic republic that relies on the people of America along with electoral colleges to vote for the leaders and representatives that create new laws, get rid of some laws, and enforce the laws. Our government is split into three separate branches that have separate responsibilities and help control and balance each other so that no one group has too much power. These three branches are the Legislative Branch, Executive Branch, and Judicial Branch. They work together to govern and protect our country.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America as a whole desperately wanted separation from Britain as did the individual colonists who did not like the way they were being treated. After many years of fighting in battle, the Americans won the revolution and right to independence. As a result of the revolution, there were changes, such as women having the right to an education, the structure of the government into a bicameral legislature, and slaves becoming viewed as people by the government, along with continuities, such as slaves remaining property to the southern plantation owners who wanted to exercise their right to the Fifth Amendment, which impacted the state’s economy, social structure, and congress representation. One social change taken upon the…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Our society continuously evaluates the balancing of powers between the state government and the federal government. It is important in a democracy for the powers to be equally distributed, for if one person in the government takes total control, it would no longer be a democracy. A government with too much power isn’t a good thing, for the society itself would change. One of the main things that helps our society balance the powers between the governments are the three divisions of government. The three branches of government consist of the legislative branch, the judiciary branch, and the executive branch.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Role of Prime Minster of Canada and the President of the United States Many people think that President of the United States has more power than Prime Minster of Canada. However, when we look at the constitution of both countries, we can see that Prime Minister of Canada has more power in his or her country than President of United States does. When we want to compare and differentiate the power of both Prime Minster of Canada and President of United States, we need to look at their system of Government, roles of both Prime Minster of Canada and President of United States on legislative power, party discipline, appointive power, influence, and military power, and ability to implement their agenda. If we want to know more about the powers and role of Prime Minster of Canada and President of United States, we have to first look at their system of Government.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalism in the United States is based on a two-level government system that control is divided between national government and subnational government. The significant points in this chapter further explains federalism, the articles of confederation and new federalism. Federalism is a two level geographical system of government in which control is distributed between national and state government. It serves three main points: first; it’s part of a system of official checks and balances that were created to influence power by sharing it between two levels of government, second; it produces a political system where interest can be characterized in the national government, and third; federalism creates governance system where the states can…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Paper 1 This paper will answer the question of What are the ends or purposes of American government? How are they different from other regimes, such as ancient Sparta or Puritan colonies? How do the ends of regimes alter the role of government in society?…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ever since America was founded, its population has always struggled with the balance between national and local politics. A national government was favored because of its ability to maintain cohesiveness among the whole population, while local, smaller governments were favored in order to limit the powers of the national government and to prevent the tyranny the colonists faced before fleeing from Britain. While some Americans argue that states’ rights hold more importance over the power of the federal government, an “overall trend in American history shows the increase of dominance of local over national politics.” The dominance of the federal government is beneficial for American society because it is more efficient, more democratic, and…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article, “The Perils of Presidentialism” Juan Linz observe that there are few stable democracies that have presidential systems of government. On the contrary, there are many parliamentary democracies and historically, they have performed better. Three major problems of presidential systems can be deduced from his essay; 1) Dual legitimacy, 2) fixed term, and 3) winner-takes-all logic. After explaining all three problems, this paper argues that winner-takes-all logic is as much applicable to parliamentary systems as it is to presidential systems.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This means that it has a compound form of government, combining a central/federal government with a regional/state government. The division of power between these two is dictated by the nation’s constitution. The US constitution dictates that the Federal Government has the power to coin money, declare war, conduct foreign relations, and oversee foreign and interstate trade. In contrast, the State Government has the power to ratify amendments, manage public health & safety, oversee trade within the state, and educational issues. In addition, both share the power to make & enforce laws, tax, and borrow money.…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thinking About Political Reform by John R. Johannes is about making the American government operate smoother for the people and politics. Political reformers are faced with these challenging issues. They must think about what reforms are great for politics and if they will work out for the people. In the book Thinking About Political Reform Johannes discuss what reform is and list numerous reforms that can benefit American government. This essay is intended to break down each chapter of Thinking About Political Reform so the reader can understand the methods of the book and understand the framework of Thinking About Political Reform.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The relationship between the State and Federal governments is complex and they are broken up into many different parts. Also the State and Federal Governments have different amounts of influence over the economy and the citizens. Another thing is that the government system and relationship between the two is very complex and controversial. This paper will discuss the relationship between the State and Federal governments and the complexity of the systems of government.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, his room for movement on various policies, for example, depends on his party’s majority in the House of Commons. The larger the majority, the more easily the PM and the government can get through policies and legislation, without the interference of any branches such as in the U.S. Therefore, if the Prime Minister has a large majority, he or she can make a significant change in Britain during their time in power (Ndla.no). In summary, both nations a\have two chambers, however the U.S.’s political system can give the President more limited power than the PM’s in…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States and the United Kingdom’s system of choosing the leader of vary greatly in how the processes are done. But if one were to investigate and research further into the systems, one would find the fundamental processes are similar in which they operate with only a few key differences between the two electoral processes. One of the major differences between the United Kingdom and the United States is that in the UK citizens do not directly elect the leader of the country, they simply vote for members of parliament, and the party with the most seats in parliament usually has its leader selected by the Queen as its prime minister. (UK Parliament 2015) The difference between that process and the one present in the United States is that…

    • 2495 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays