The article “should hospitals and doctors apologize for patients” by Sandra G. Boodman seeks to address how apologizing could work and save time and money. In addition to the high litigation cost that’s getting up every since. However, sometimes it is entirely useless because human life is priceless. The article problems being discussed whether doctors have the right to not tell the patient about the mistake and its process. Although the program that Sandra mentions will save time and money sometimes it is about principle not just the value.
In the beginning, the writer talks about two different cases of patients one of them told about that medical error. However, the other incident didn't know about her medical error, and the …show more content…
Lower said that program is to save money for hospitals. Also, the author gave advantages and disadvantages about this kind of situation. Doing the right thing part first disclosed program Kerman and Boothman (now) why they were doing it, encourage-honest. Also, show the advantages of the program.
Obviously, from the abstract of the article that this is no simple issue. In fact, the article is somewhat confusing for the first couple sentence. And it is somehow makes the examples complicated. For example she should describe a cause then closed it before start another cause so we can stay tuned. Sandra said “unlike Crisp” which is kind to be confusing to me if she going to talk about a new case or the same patient. However, her explanation was clear to understand. she was briefly in her explanation that makes her article interesting and enjoyable. Anyways it will be much better if the writer starts with a clear introduction to grab our attention since the beginning. Because sometimes we just scan the beginning to decide if we want to read this article or not. overall it is getting better after a while of reading which I really appreciate from the
In the beginning, the writer talks about two different cases of patients one of them told about that medical error. However, the other incident didn't know about her medical error, and the …show more content…
Lower said that program is to save money for hospitals. Also, the author gave advantages and disadvantages about this kind of situation. Doing the right thing part first disclosed program Kerman and Boothman (now) why they were doing it, encourage-honest. Also, show the advantages of the program.
Obviously, from the abstract of the article that this is no simple issue. In fact, the article is somewhat confusing for the first couple sentence. And it is somehow makes the examples complicated. For example she should describe a cause then closed it before start another cause so we can stay tuned. Sandra said “unlike Crisp” which is kind to be confusing to me if she going to talk about a new case or the same patient. However, her explanation was clear to understand. she was briefly in her explanation that makes her article interesting and enjoyable. Anyways it will be much better if the writer starts with a clear introduction to grab our attention since the beginning. Because sometimes we just scan the beginning to decide if we want to read this article or not. overall it is getting better after a while of reading which I really appreciate from the