Should Death Penalty Be Legal?

Superior Essays
Capital punishment results in death by execution. Capital punishment is legalized in 31 states and abolished in 19 states (Death Penalty Information Center). I believe the death penalty should be legal in all 50 of the United states in the form of first degree murder. First degree murder is In order for someone to be found guilty of first degree murder the government must prove that the person killed another person; the person killed the other person with malice aforethought; and the killing was premeditated.To kill with malice aforethought means to kill either deliberately and intentionally or recklessly with extreme disregard for human life (lectlaw.com). There are many reasons as to why I believe the death penalty should be legal in all …show more content…
The argument has been proven that it is proven to be moral to use the death penalty as a punishment for taking someone else’s life. This was proven by Immanuel Kant who put forth the idea that, “a society that is not willing to demand a life of somebody who has taken somebody else’s life is simply immoral” (ProCon.org). When it comes to justice there is a concept called proportionality which basically says the punishment should fit the crime. In other words if you take a life you should expect to have your life be taken too. It is worth it to take into consideration that without this concept death would be an appropriate punishment for all who use force for whatever crime they are committing. A lack of justice being properly served would also encourage the citizens to take justice into their own hands since the state will not do anything to properly punish the criminal. It is immoral to not properly punish a person who has committed such a horrendous crime. “The criminal is also executed humanely; in no way is he subjected to torture or any form of cruelty. All states that use the death penalty use lethal injection; the days of subjecting a prisoner to hanging or the electric chair are long gone in the US. Inmates are first given a large dose of an anesthetic so they do not feel any pain (Bosner).” The above statement made by Bosner proves the death penalty is moral and …show more content…
This has not happened since the death penalty was reintroduced in 1976. Steven D. Stewart refutes this argument: “…No system of justice can produce results which are 100% certain all the time. Mistakes will be made in any system which relies upon human testimony for proof. We should be vigilant to uncover and avoid such mistakes. Our system of justice rightfully demands a higher standard for death penalty cases. However, the risk of making a mistake with the extraordinary due process applied in death penalty cases is very small, and there is no credible evidence to show that any innocent persons have been executed at least since the death penalty was reactivated in 1976…The inevitability of a mistake should not serve as grounds to eliminate the death penalty any more than the risk of having a fatal wreck should make automobiles illegal…” Even though some people overestimate this fact of innocent citizens being executed, there is room for small mistakes but that does not mean the death penalty should be abolished due to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For example, Jeffrey Dahmer was a notorious serial killer and known cannibal who raped, murdered, and dismembered his victims. Instead of facing retributive punishment for his crimes, he was sentenced to multiple life terms and was later killed by an inmate. A person who has taken the life of another purposely and premeditated deserves to face the punishment of death under law. Executing a criminal who murdered another human being offers a way of retribution to the loved ones of the victim because even though they cannot change what has happened or have their loved one back, by seeing justice be served it assures to them that there will be no other victims and families who face the same tragedy, giving them some closure.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An illustration of this is Carlos DeLuna how was convicted in 1983 for a crime he did not commit but still led to his execution. After further evidence Carlos DeLuna was proven innocent, but it was too late. In addition, getting rid of capital punishment would prevent cases like Carlos DeLuna’s and thousands of others wrongly convicted on death row. However, an influential reason to abolish capital punishment is how costly trying each penalty case is. The process is longer and complicated therefore, increases the cost for tax payers.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is mainly used in criminal cases when a criminal kills multiple people, he or she is a fugitive of the law, or when someone else has over sixty offenses. There are restrictions on who the penalty can be used against and the reason, for the penalty being put on a person. It is known that there are exceptions to all the rules and for this reason the death penalty should not be allowed in the United States. Imagine being a grieving mother whose child made a mistake because no one saw the warning signs, and no one got him help. It is realized that what they did was wrong but no matter how bad the crime committed was, you cannot force yourself to love your family any less and seeing someone you love punished by death is hard for…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty shouldn’t be legal because it isn't ethical. I believe this because the criminal isn't always executed, many executed criminals are innocent, the death penalty costs more than life in prison, many ways of execution take a long time, some ways of execution…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For those whom like to act as if they were God and take a life intentionally deserves to be punished. In fact, other than God whom can punish someone are the jails and prison that house these types of individuals. There are some cold blooded killers out in the world, along with some individuals whom are not mentally able to make conscious delinquent actions. In fact these types of people become inmates inside of correctional institutions that are housed in supermax sanctions have prompted arguments regarding people are for or against the death penalty, the bans on executions on the mentally retarded and juveniles are also addressed. Giving that this world is filled with a very mixed cultural background of all kinds of human beings.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around the vast globe, thousands of people are sentenced to death annually (The Death Penalty V. Human Rights: Why Abolish the Death Penalty?). Should the government execute people who commit heinous crimes? In 2014, in the United States alone, 35 people were ripped of their lives on the execution table (The Death Penalty V. Human Rights: Why Abolish the Death Penalty?). It is a common belief that the death penalty is a sufficient punishment for people who commit hostile and death-provoking crimes. Yet, what justice is served by the taking of another human life?…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Taking the life of another has been considered a heinous crime that is worthy of capital punishment; but should taking the life of a person who has taken the life of another be justified? Is the murderer’s life less important than that of the person whose life he took? The death penalty has been the highest form of punishment around the United States, execution of innocent men, its negative influence on our society and the offence it has against human rights are all concerns that make the capital punishment wrong. The first established death penalty laws date as far back ats the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon, which codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It has been argued over the years that capital punishment violates the eight amendment in the Constitution of the United States of America. It was argued that because the eighth amendment states that no cruel and unusual punishments should be inflicted upon anyone, so, capital punishment should not be used as a form of paying for a crime. What is not being taken under consideration, however, is the fact that the law has been morally and properly assessing these cases. How so? Well, lets begin by stating that the Supreme Court ruled in 1976 in the Gregg v. Georgia and Jurek v. Texas, that a death sentence did not violate the eighth amendment as the forms of execution have been reformed so that the punishments are not categorized as inhumane and cruel.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the surveys to the general public, when given the alternative of life imprisonment without parole as opposed to the death penalty, the approval rate for the death penalty dropped. The death penalty should be abolished due to its inability to carry out one of its purposes of preventing other crime from oc-curring. In a perfect world, the death penalty would not ensue any racial or geographical bias, and there would be an even-handedness or general way of carrying out this punishment. Howev-er, this nation’s method fails to distribute it equally. The value of a human’s life cannot be meas-ure; consequently, the life’s worth cannot be equated with that of another’s life.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    American prisons are extremely overpopulated, thus executing the worst kind of criminals will be beneficial to the prison system. Various workers in the criminal justice field also believe that capital punishment costs less than life imprisonment. The death penalty ensures that fewer taxpayers’ money is spent for the maintenance of individuals that have acted against society in the most violent way (Kasten, 1996). Capital punishment is the only way that victims and their families can get the justice that they…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On July 6, 2003, a man, known as the Vincent E. Brothers killed his entire family after church one Sunday morning. At church, he heard a rumor that his wife Joanie Harper wanted a divorce when he received this news he became furious. When they came home from he was nowhere to be found by his family. His family then went on to do what they did every Sunday and that was to take a nap. After they fell asleep an armed man with a .22 caliber pistol intruded the house and went to the back room, then shot the grandmother at point blank range.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is a subject that can be and has been debated for lengthy amounts of time. There are still many countries that perform executions today, but many of these countries differ from the United States greatly. While the death penalty has been used as early as eighteenth century B.C., there is no doubt that there are many factors that make the death penalty a questionable subject in the modern United States. The death penalty should not be utilized in the United States because it is costly, inhumane, and inaccurate.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should the Death penalty be allowed in the US Although there haven't been many executions since 1999, however, there were over 90 executions in the year 1999 according to CNN. In addition to this, the united states government hasn't executed anyone in over 60 years. Also, Texas has executed over 550 people in the last 40 years, according to the Washington Post. The death penalty should not be in effect in the united states of America.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People live in a society that is surrounded by violent behavior for that reason the justice uses the death penalty to send out a positive message for those who tend to commit capital offence. Capital punishment is not an act we wish to place on a single soul, but it is the best way to keep the killer out of society and prevent any further murders. There is no concrete evidence of either positive or negative effect, but this does not mean it would not help lower the crime rate. People need to understand that the best way to prevent any possible murders in the future is not let the killer walk free. The death penalty allows us to see the seriousness of a crime and the value of life.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Capital Punishments role in America plays a huge part in how America handles offenders and repeat offenders. Staticbrain.com reports that Time magazine says,” An estimated 2,000,000 people have been victims of crimes, from assault to murder. With insufficient laws to address these issues, criminals become careless and bolder. For this reason, there is a need for a death penalty.” Capital punishment, should not be abolished because, it takes committing a heinous act to receive the death penalty.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays