I learned that as reported by the University of Georgia they look at 3,232 full-page ads published in 1983, 1993 and 2003 in popular magazines Cosmopolitan, Redbook, Esquire, Playboy, Newsweek and Time, and researchers from UGA found sexual imagery in 20 percent of the ads. Also that it was reported magazine advertisement were using sex to sell everything from alcohol to banking services has increased over the years: 15 percent of ads studied used sex as a selling point in 1983. That percentage grew to 27 percent in 2003 (Mulvey). Dolliver claims that an Adweek poll revealed more than 70 percent of respondents think there is too much sexual imagery in advertising, and that advertising analyses suggest ads are more sexual than ever before. As cited in Reichert (2002), Soley and Reid (1988) found that women were dressed sexually-suggestive, partially clad, or nude in 31 percent of ads in 1964 compared to 35 percent in 1984 and the number is continually rising. As you can see sexual advertisements are still increasing and won’t be declining anytime soon, sex does sell…as we are being exposed to it more and more it is becoming the …show more content…
The ad displays half-naked men standing around a lone woman, who's lying on the ground in a fairly suggestive position. Just like the previous advertisements I analyzed this ad also features very strong sexuality. The two men are completely shirtless and the other two men wearing a shirt with their chest exposed while the women lying down wearing a really short outfit with high-heels. Everyone in the ad body appears to have oil on their skin and it seems as if they have a glistening glow. We are shown a frontal angle of all the men eying this woman lying on the floor. In the ad it seems to promote the glamorization of rape or at the very least the promoting male dominance over females. I suppose D&G want people to see the superficial idea that if you wear their clothes, you will feel powerful and in control (just like these men in the advertisement). Although this works because the social construct of our society has accepted this idea of male dominance (over women and inferior men). It amazing to see how far companies will go to convince consumers to buy their