Separation Of Powers: Check And Balance Of Pillars

Decent Essays
I would have to agree that separation of powers is a check and balancing of pillars, however I would have to disagree that is to ensure that one is not more powerful than the other. The separation of powers was created and is disperse into three branches, which are the legislative branch, executive branch and the judicial branch. They are meant to work together and generate control. The way I see it is the legislative is the one that generates the law, the legislative enforces it and the judicial branch is the middle person, making sure that whatever law is being created and enforced dose not go against the constitution. For example, in my initial post a talk about the case of “United States v. Alvarez” ( “2011 Term Opinions of the Court”,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This quote from James Madison declares that the purpose for separation of powers is to make sure that not one person will hold too much power, no matter it be to make laws and enforce them, enforce law and explain them, or any combination of the three. If someone were to have power in more than one field, they would be classified as a tyrant. This is why today, we do not let someone in legislative, executive, and judicial at the same time because no matter what kind of government, a tyrant can still exist within that government. To make sure that no one person can be a part of more than one branch, Articles 1, 2, and 3 state the position of each branch. Article one, Section one gives the legislative power to congress.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this system created by the Constitution, one department’s ambition and need for power hinders the other department’s liberty. In order to possess power, the departments must find an equal balance. This equal balance is “necessary to control the abuses of government. ”(51) Although equal separation of power is ideal, “the legislative authority necessarily predominates.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Checks and balances were created to keep one branch of government from having control over another branch of government. In Document C, it says, “… the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other… (The three branches) should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” This means the branches of government all check each other to make sure one branch does not have more power than another. The branches can approve or disapprove with things the other branches have decided on. If one branch became over powered than it could take over the government resulting in tyranny.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Judicial power of the U.S shall be invested in one supreme court”. This shows that each branch has its own job while still having to communicate with each other. Overall, separation of powers become the most important because each branch has a say in what is right or wrong.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fundamental truth of separation of powers and checks and balances is that they prevent the government from gaining too much power which could potentially lead to a tyranny. Checks and balances help keep separation of powers by giving each branch specific powers that can check the other branch's actions. These checks and balances allow the branches to have limited power while maintaining the clear separation of powers into three branches and have ultimately created a limited/balanced form of government. Balance is described as an even distribution of weight enabling someone or something to remain upright and steady. The system of separation of powers distributes the government's power into three even branches while checks and balances allows these branches to stay even in power and prevent the branches from gaining too much power, overall enabling the government to stay upright and perform its duties to the people properly.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation of powers defend against tyranny by separating the three branches, legislative, executive, judicial. They should be extremely separate, Madison said in a federalist paper that, “Liberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct” (Doc B). Some examples that they are separate is that they all have different jobs, Congress makes laws, the president and his cabinet enforce them, and the justices of the supreme court interpret them. They are only supposed to do their job, not the other branches. You cannot have the president fire judges because they disagree, it would lead to politics influencing the cases.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Good Evening Margueretta, Thanks for sharing! Great definition of checks, balances, and separation powers. I love your real-world examples they are very interesting, I knew of the immigration policy because, I did an essay on immigration in ethics. I have never heard of the Lily Ledbetter Fair pay, so I had to read up on it and found it very interesting. Even though the Constitution states that all branches need to play as team players, sometimes here recently I believe the President seems to be playing in a game all by himself.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The structure of Checks and Balances is to allow each branch of government to have equal power so one doesn't have more power over the other branches. Each government has their own particular power; Legislative Branch makes the laws, the Executive Branch enforces and carries out those laws and lastly the Judicial Branch who interprets the laws. An example given in Patterson is that the Congress can pass laws yet the President of the United States is allowed to veto them. Even though the president has the ability to veto the law, Congress can overturn that veto with a two-thirds vote. If the President and Congress come to an agreement on particular laws the Supreme Court can still declare the law to be unconstitutional or not.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Separation of Power limits government by not giving any branch in government complete control…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “ …the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other…. [The three branches] should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other,” wrote Madison in Federalist Paper 51 (Doc C). The main idea of checks and balances was that the three separated branches would have the each have powers limiting the others, such as the legislative branch having the ability to make laws, but the judicial branch would decide if the law is constitutional and the president, who pertains to the executive branch, has the power of vetoing the newly passed law.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, the founding fathers did not want one single branch of the government to have too much power over the others. Separation of Powers allows for Checks and Balances. The legislative branch is responsible for passing laws that the executive can enact or veto. The Judiciary can review whether or not a bill, or a law is lawful under the Constitution. Moreover, Congress could remove the president if he or she is not doing his or her job properly.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This essay will discuss why the Australian Constitution has separated the legislative, executive and judicial powers. The separation of powers is about preserving our freedom as enshrined in the Australian Constitution. The history of the separation of powers theory will be discussed, also there will be references to weekly reading materials and weekly tasks. Argued will be that the reasoning behind the separation of power is to ensure that no branch of government or an individual has sole power of the government and the country with the checks and balances system being vital to ensure the former statement. Governmental Powers Described In order to understand why we separate the legislative, executive and judicial powers in the Australian…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So how the separation of powers worked was the government was split into 3 branches; The executive (The president and “workers”), Legislature (The senate and house of representatives) and the Judicial branch (Supreme court and lower courts.) So checks and balances “act” was built so that no branch would become to powerful. So each one branch is basically watched by the other two. So for example; The president (the “executive branch”) can veto laws by congress. Congress can override the veto by a 2/3rds vote.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just Government

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The US Constitution created three branches, the executive, the legislative and the judicial. These branches are independent but have actions they can take to ensure that the other two don’t misuse their power. Power was divided between houses and each house checked every other house so that there would be no excessive power. (Evidence)Due to this, the three branches have a balance between governmental power. The system of checks and balances tried to create a better government for the people by ensuring that no branch of the government had excessive power.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America is a country where powers are separated in order to prevent an all powerful branch of government. The three main branches of government are the Executive, Judicial and Legislative branch. These branched serve the purpose of checking and balancing each other. The Executive branch has the power to implement laws. These laws are brought on by the Legislative branch.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays