Second Punic War

Decent Essays
After 210 BC, Roman decided to advance against Cartagena and open a second front in Spain, under the leadership of newly assigned consuls. Two of them were brothers: Publius Scipio and Gnaeus Scipio, lead Roman army and gain strategic advantages by defeating the Carthaginian forces. Both of them died in battles, in 211 BC. Then the Roman voters assigned the new commander Publius Cornelius Scipio, in fact that was the son of Publius Scipio and nephew of Gnaeus Scipio.

Publius Cornelius Scipio achieved significant victories in Spain, in 209 BC he captured Cartago Nova, a central important city of Carthage. By 206 BC Roman forces gain military control over Spain and overcome all Carthage forces. In 205 Publius Cornelius Scipio planed an invasion
…show more content…
The increasing number of military campaigns and increase size of the controlled territories, brought Rome to ne practice to elect four praetors one year and six the next. Furthermore, gave more freedom in the decision-making processes to the office holders for the more remote areas of the Roman territories. Nevertheless, those steps were not able to fully answer the newly raised needs of consuls, generals, praetors, governors and other office positions, because of that Rome resorted to a new method, to extend the office holder positions, procedure known as “prorogation”. Those office holders were known as proconsul or propraetor. After the Second Punic War, this practice become more common. The Senate took the lead in the conduct of wars and diplomacy, received ambassadors and also took the responsibilities to assign duties to officeholders. With the increase size of territories either concurred or joining as allies, Rome magistrates and the Senate thought that they become part of the imperium, the Latin term is does not denote clearly territory nor imply administrative responsibilities or prescribe any duties by the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Roman Republic was built on the traditional policy of compromise, devoted to ensure the welfare of the people. In time, the struggle for authority brought fundamental changes to the traditional sentiments of the Republic. As territory expansions brought great wealth into the country, power hungry senators and government officials harbored political ambitions and competed for power. Political treachery and self-interest within the senate and the assemblies gave way to economic turmoil and social unrest. The fight for control under the existing Republic ultimately demanded a conversion toward Empire, but before the transition could take place Rome would have to go through a series of civil war, mob violence and murder.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    With influence from his father and his older brother Hasdrubal, Hannibal always looked to a powerful figure for inspiration of great warfare and power. Whilst Hannibal has been credited for having great leadership and military qualities, Livy states that ‘the man’s great virtues were matched by his enormous vices: pitiless cruelty, a treachery worse than Punic, no regard for truth, and no integrity, no fear of the gods or respect for an oath, and no scruples’ . Who Hannibal was as a soldier and leader was a large contributor to the ways in which the events leading to the war occurred. The attack and capture on Saguntum was a well thought out plan by Hannibal to ensure a reaction from the Romans. This failure on Rome’s part to protect Saguntum from Hannibal and the Carthaginians cost Rome any chance of gaining allies within Spain to fight against the Carthaginians.…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of his most popular accomplishments was at the episode of the Second Punic War, when he walked an armed force, which included elephants, from Iberia over the Pyrenees and the Alps into Italy. In his initial couple of years in Italy, he won three emotional triumphs Trebia, Trasimene, and Cannae, in which he separated himself for his capacity to focus his and his rival's qualities and shortcomings, and to play the fight to his qualities and the foe's shortcomings and won over numerous partners of Rome. Hannibal involved much of Italy for a long time, yet a Roman counter-attack of North Africa constrained him to come back to Carthage, where he was unequivocally vanquished by Scipio Africanus at the Battle of Zama. Scipio had considered Hannibal's strategies and splendidly concocted some of his own, lastly crushed Rome's adversary at Zama, having at one time driven Hasdrubal, Hannibal's sibling, out of the Iberian…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Dbq

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There he was involved in a military victory against Mithradates 6, king of Pontus. this action he was awarded the corona civia.i high distinction of the army like the victora cross today. Q2 Just before Julius Caesar took control of rome in 48BC, the Roman Empire was not ruled by an Emperor but rather by two consuls who were elected by the citizens of Rome.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hannibal was a Carthaginian general who is considered to be one of the most talented and able field commanders. Although the military strategies that were used during this time were few and far between, Hannibal, who would fight like no other, would use his wits to outsmart the Romans in many battles. Hannibal could be called the general who won the battle and lost the war because of his new military formation that would win the Battle of Cannae, his Hellenistic approach to war and his tactics that would later be used against him to end the Second Punic War. Hannibal began the Second Punic War when he attacked the city of Saguntum, which was a Roman ally, and then continued on his conquest and "terrified the Romans by marching troops and war elephants over the Alps into Italy", through northern Italy and into Roman territory, capturing cities along the way (Hunt, Martin, Rosenwein & Smith, 2012).…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Describe the impact of three significant political events in Rome from the Punic Wars through the reign of Constantine. (You should pull single events, not movements, from across the time frame. For example, “the collapse of the Republic” is not an event, it is a process or movement. “Octavian’s victory over Antony’s forces in the Battle of Actium” is an event.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These consuls were in charge of governmental decisions, choosing officials, and commanding the Roman army. The only things that had a higher authority that the consuls were the emperor’s commands, and the laws of the…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the long rule of the Roman empire, 100 C.E. to 600 C.E., there have been many changes and continuities in this classical era. These include both political and cultural impacts such as the formation of a centralized government, the spread of the Latin and Greek languages, and the transition of religion. A political continuity would be the fact that Roman laws were based on the Greek’s foundation of democracy. During the Roman Republic, a constitution was developed which characterized laws about the Senate, separation of powers, and checks and balances.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My senator’s military role is a legitimate example of the cursus honorum that functioned in Roman society in that before a patrician man could hold a magisterial office, id est, becoming a member of the senatorial class, he had to serve in a military capacity for the state (Lendering 2002). During this period of service, my senator would have had to have served under a more senior commander, and Tiberius would have served in this capacity. Upon return from the mandatory military service, a member of the senatorial class would serve in various magisterial roles, as a quaestor around the age of 30, as an aedile at 37, a praetor at 40, and then as a consul at the age of at least 43 (Lendering 2002). The consular position itself, while seen as the pinnacle of a Roman senator’s career, was coloured by whether it was during the first or latter half of the year, and this is presented in this way to emphasise the prestige associated with the position. The final part of my response includes reference and quotations to the mannerisms of Tiberius in his ways of speaking and deliberation.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Citizenship is a status given by a government to some or all of its people. Rome gave citizenship to most of its people, whereas Athens gave citizenship very few of its people. The Roman government was more lenient to its population 45,000,000 people. The Roman government had a system set up for those who were foreigners and wanted to become citizens. The Romans may have been lenient, but they had limits for citizens too.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The story of Rome’s struggle with Carthage was truly a story of total war, of a conflict spread over more than a century in which utter destruction of one side was the only possible outcome. The novel focused on the final decades leading up to the fall of Carthage in 146 b.c. Fabius, who accompanies Scipio from his beginnings in Rome through the wars in Macedonia and Spain to…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first chapter of William V. Harris’s book, War and Imperialism in Republican Rome, the author makes use of primary sources, such as Polybius, and archeological evidence to analyze Roman attitudes towards war. Since warfare was an integral part of life for the Roman Empire, Harris attempts to provide the reasoning behind their desire to continuously engage in battle. Specifically, in the first half of chapter one entitled, “Roman Attitudes Towards War”, Harris looks at the aristocracy and their general feelings towards war. Overall, Harris claims there were multiple political and social reasons that Romans engaged in war. Specifically, Harris analyzes that with regards to the aristocracy, war gave them opportunities to further their political…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In fact the whole peninsula was under Roman rule after only seventy years of conquering. The Roman military system that had developed enough soldiers for modern day war waged a sixty-year war with the Carthaginians, led by Hannibal. After six decades of constant war, and even with his war elephants, Hannibal was unable to contest the tens of thousands of Roman soldiers that were going against him. He was worn down and Carthage fell to Rome. This war on Carthage became the turning point in Rome’s success.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Punic War 1 vs. Punic War 2 The Punic Wars were an important part of Roman History starting in 264 BCE (Duiker). The Romans and taken over what they wanted in Italy and were on a quest to conquer the entire Mediterranean area. There were Three Punic Wars and they were between Rome and Carthage.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, it will discuss the strengths of both city-states and how Rome became a naval powerhouse by the end of the First Punic War. In 814 B.C. the city of Carthage was founded, becoming the…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays