Which brings up the main problem of government being involved in the private parts of American lives. There is no need for government to define or classify any one American unless it is genuinely hurting others or taking away others rights. The idea of classifying American citizens, which happen to be homosexuals, as a social problem is the equivalent of the “social problems” Americans had with African Americans in the 1950s. Though lets not forget when we mention the government who we’re really talking about is people. So in a way Reyes is requesting we let people decide who to classify. She’s advocating we call it a “social problem”, but what is this “problem”? She’s calling homosexuality the problem, but in reality there is none. Homosexuality is no more a problem that a persons skin; in which case is no problem at all. Reyes is wrong in thinking homosexuality requires government intervention to tell us that it’s a “social problem”, or that homosexuality is a problem at
Which brings up the main problem of government being involved in the private parts of American lives. There is no need for government to define or classify any one American unless it is genuinely hurting others or taking away others rights. The idea of classifying American citizens, which happen to be homosexuals, as a social problem is the equivalent of the “social problems” Americans had with African Americans in the 1950s. Though lets not forget when we mention the government who we’re really talking about is people. So in a way Reyes is requesting we let people decide who to classify. She’s advocating we call it a “social problem”, but what is this “problem”? She’s calling homosexuality the problem, but in reality there is none. Homosexuality is no more a problem that a persons skin; in which case is no problem at all. Reyes is wrong in thinking homosexuality requires government intervention to tell us that it’s a “social problem”, or that homosexuality is a problem at