Roper V. Simmons Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
In one of the biggest landmark cases of American history, Roper v. Simmons was a case that upended the death penalty for minors, three years after the unfortunate death of Napoleon Beazley. This was monumental for both the American justice system and the general public, because it showed that public sentiment toward the death penalty had shifted massively enough in order to cause change in the legal system. With newly found revelations that the American public was now not okay with the execution of minors, Cristopher Simmons was granted a stay during his time on death row in 2002 with the simultaneous consideration of Atkins v. Virginia. Not only did this allow him to live, but it became a crucial precedent for the cases to follow. Although …show more content…
Although Tessmer dropped out amidst the events, Simmons and Benjamin proceeded to kidnap their victim and throw her off a bridge where she died. Consequently, Christopher Simmons was sentenced to death for premeditated murder which he was clearly guilty of, on account of his confession and reenactment at the crime scene. After Simmon’s stay was granted after the consideration of Atkins v. Virginia, a new petition was filed. After it was found that the national consensus had changed in favor of abolishing the death penalty for minors, Simmons was instead sentenced to life without parole (Capital Punishment In …show more content…
Many argue that death penalty for juveniles should be determined based on local standards, just like the regular death penalty, while some argue this should be determined on a national level. Regarding this form of thinking, it is only fair that if the national age of majority is 18, it should be no different for the death penalty limit to be 18 as well. If a person cannot have legal control over their life until that age, it doesn’t seem justifiable that minors be executed when they have practically no legal control over their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case name: Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987) Facts: Ardith McPherson was appointed a deputy in the Constable’s office of Harris County, Texas, on January 12, 1981. Her duties were only clerical. On March 30, 1981, McPherson discussed with her boyfriend, and fellow employee, a report about an attempt to assassinate the President of the United States. She made the remark “If they go for him again, I hope they get him”. Her remark was reported to Constable Rankin, who fired McPherson, even though she told him she did not mean anything by it.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Until 2002, Simmons made appeals to state and federal court. In 2002, Simmons execution was delayed as the Supreme Court of Missouri decided Atkins v. Virginia. In Atkins v. Virginia, the Supreme Court of Missouri held that eighth and the amendments prohibit the execution of minors. Simmons filed a new petition for state postconviction relief considering the Atkins v. Virginia case. The Missouri Supreme Court based on this decision resentenced Simmons death sentence to life in prison without chance of parole.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case Review Simmons

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Afterward, Simmons appealed his conviction, and filed a direct appeal and petition to both state and federal postconviction relief. His direct appeal and petition were rejected by both state and federal postconviction relief. After being rejected he filed a new petition for state postconviction relief, saying that both the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments forbid the death penalty on offenders convicted of a crime they committed when they were under the age of eighteen. The Supreme Court agreed with Simmons and sentenced him to life in prison without eligibility to be released. The Simmons vs Roper case ruled the decision that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments forbid the death penalty on…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cole Cannon Case Summary

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The U.S. Supreme Court would judge the case on whether sentencing a fourteen-year-old to life in prison without parole violates the Eight and Fourteenth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment (Carrizales & Schultz, n.d.). Miller’s counsel argued that sentencing a fourteen-year-old to life without parole without considering certain factors such as his age violates the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments’ ban on cruel and unusual punishment (Carrizales & Schultz, n.d.). The state of Alabama argued that punishing a fourteen-year-old to life without parole does not violate the Eight or Fourteenth Amendment, but serves a justifiable penological goal when the crime is aggravated murder (Carrizales & Schultz,…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Libery Case Study

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In December 1989, Robert Langley was convicted by a Marion county jury of sixteen counts of aggravated murder occurring after the disappearance and death of Anne Gray. The jury was instructed to give the penalty “life imprisonment without the possibility of parole,” if one or more of the four questions necessary for the death penalty were not answered. However, if ten or more of the members of the jury found that there was mitigating circumstances they could give the defendant “life imprisonment with possibility of parole.” In the end, the jury unanimously answered “yes” to all four questions relating to the death penalty. This sent the trial judge into judgment in which he convicted the defendant of aggravated murder and sentenced him to death.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was sentenced to death in 1993, when he was only 17. Christopher challenged his remaining death sentence for murder, asked for an appeal, and claimed that the execution of minors violates the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment found in the 8th and 14th amendment. The Missouri state court ruled the death penalty for murder. A series of appeals followed the case to the state and federal courts that lasted until 2002, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the execution of the mentally ill and minors violated the 8th and 14th amendment. With the 5 to 4 vote, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Simmons and set aside Simmons’ death sentence in favor of life in prison without eligibility for release.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Stanford v. Kentucky, the Supreme Court held that the implementation of the death penalty on criminals over the age of sixteen at the time of their crime did not violate the Eighth Amendment’s ban against cruel and unusual punishment. The Court ruled that the definition of cruel or unusual punishment hinged on said society's description of "evolving standards of decency." In Stanford vs. Kentucky, the Court found that the standards of decency did not reveal a clear national consensus against the use of the death penalty on capital offenders for crimes committed while the offender was over the age of sixteen. Thus, the belief that individual states maintained jurisdiction over the appropriate implementation of the death penalty was held…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roper Vs Simmons Essay

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Simmons and Thompson v. Oklahoma is where two minors are sentenced to the death penalty. A case is argued that capital punishment of a minor is a form of cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment (Roper v. Simmons, 2005). Number of Similarities The Simmons and Thompson were minors that committed heinous murderous acts. Both were tried and convicted as adults in a court of law and as a result, both were sentenced to the death penalty.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roper V. Simmons Essay

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I agree with the Supreme Court that a death penalty awarded to someone under the age of 18 is inhumane and cruel, but I strongly believe life in prison for such a crime at age 17 is warranted. My argument is made out of a balance of retribution and the future safety of society. Rehabilitation, if it is still possible, should be a focus for the offender himself. That’s why I think judicial waivers are best in these types of situations. States can use discretionary or mandatory transfers to adult court.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Re Gault Case Essay

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court ruled, “Capital punishment must be limited to offenders who commit a narrow category of the most serious crimes and extreme culpability makes them deserving of execution.” www.casebriefs.com This is due to the fact that juveniles lack maturity and understanding of responsibility. They are also more vulnerable or susceptible to negative influences and outside pressures. The courts also noted that the character of a juvenile is not as well formed as an adult.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Simmon's execution. During this time the U.S. Supreme Court decided Atkins v. Virginia ruled that executing the mentally disabled violated the Eighth and fourteenth Amendment prohibitions on cruel and unusual punishment because a majority of Americans found it cruel and unusual. This made the Missouri Supreme Court decide to reconsider Simmons' case. Using the reasoning from the Atkins case, the Missouri court decided that the U.S. Supreme Court's 1989 decision in Stanford v. Kentucky, which held that executing minors was not unconstitutional, was no longer valid. The opinion in Stanford v. Kentucky had relied on a finding that a majority of Americans did not consider the execution of minors to be cruel and unusual.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Evan Miller has had a rough upbringing. He has had emotional abandonment from his alcoholic and drug abused mother, his abusive father and forced to be placed in multiple foster cares throughout his childhood. Miller is a prime example of an abandoned, troubled minor, whose true destiny has been destroyed due to these circumstances. The problems he has faced steered him to being depressed and unsatisfied, using drugs, alcohol and four suicide attempts to trying and fulfill the emptiness he has been feeling his entire life.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juveniles as young as 14 are being positioned in prisons with adults from minimum to maximum prisons. A minimum prison would house offenders who have committed a minor offense such as theft, while a maximum prison house felonies who have engaged in activities such as rape or murder. In 2005, the Supreme Court banned the death penalty ruling “people under 18 are immature, irresponsible, susceptible to peer-pressure and often capable of change (Scott, 2012).” Although, the court recognizes juveniles are immature, irresponsible, and susceptible to peer-pressure yet juveniles remain housed with adults. “For instance, several studies have reported a greater probability of recidivism for juveniles processed in the adult justice system compared with…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There have been many opinions on juveniles being convicted as adults on the crimes they have committed. When it comes to some of these harsh crimes, who could not punish the individual to the fullest? It does not matter how old a person is because everyone knows the difference between right and wrong. If someone is raised differently and believes it is okay to murder another human, than they cannot just change their mindset. An individual that makes and adult decision should have the same consequences.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision of juveniles being tried as adults in the world of criminal justice has usually been an object of controversy. Some agree that an adolescent who commits a serious crime like murder deserves to be penalized exactly like an adult; while others declare that a minor should not face the same punishment as an adult. However, no matter how severe or appalling a crime may be, juveniles should not be tried as adults; the reason being that everyone should be granted the chance to learn from their mistakes. Juveniles should not be punished as adults, simply because they biologically distinct from adults. Teenagers are the midsection between children and adults.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays