Roman Republic Political Analysis

Improved Essays
The Roman Republic started in 509 B.C with the expulsion of the last Etruscan king. Executive power shifted from the king to two elected officials called consuls. Those who elected the consuls were those in the Patrician class who were families of the men in the Senate. As the Patricians elected who takes the seat of a consul, the actions of the consuls were representative to the needs of the Patrician class and ignored the needs of the lower class plebeians. Plebeians had gained more representation through a unoffical body called the Concilium Plebis. The Concilium Plebis was a group of plebeian officials called Tribunes who safeguarded the interests of the plebeians and negotiated with the consuls and the Senate. Rome’s law had remained unwritten …show more content…
The Senate had stayed but Julius had reduced the political power of the Senate and increased the number of members to 900. This action had decentralized the power of the Senate but still allowed it to have the ability to make political decisions.Under this, the Republic constitution and ideology would have been preserved through the Senate as that method allows mass ideology populations to be represented and as the Republic was used for a such a large amount of time, its influences would be able to seen in the emperorship.
There were many pushes in order to stop to resulting strife inside the Roman Republic. The Gracchi brothers both had pushes for legislation that would have limited the amount of land owned by a single person helping the lower class but both were forced out of politics by the wealthy landowners. General Sulla had been appointed dictator and held the Roman Republic at peace at the cost of the rights of the lower class citizens. The peace offered by Sulla had not lasted and during the strife between the lower class and the higher class, Julius Caesar had taken over the Senate and named himself emperor thus ending the Roman Republic and starting the Roman Empire.
During the decline of the empire, the Rome had filtered through its fair share of kings and emperors. Even with the lack of a strong leader, the Roman Empire had survived through 70 emperors. The empire had efficient administration at every level of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The group of men in the Roman Senate were responsible for war policy, controlling lands, government decisions and making laws. The Roman government benefited from the Roman Senate because the Senate kept there government stable. In the Roman Senate there were only 300 men, which is a very small number of…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DBQ On Rome's Government

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Document A, it states that the people are in charge of the assemblies, which has the power to pass laws or to repeal one. The assembly also had say in whether to proceed into warfare or to maintain peace. These implements were salient within the Roman society, and evidently the bulk of important fragments within bounds…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rise Of Rome Dbq

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Introduction After asserting its independence, Rome was led by dictators and consuls all from the aristroctrats. The revolt, after all, had been led by the nobles. Yet the commoners of Rome, the plebeians, were the larger part and demanded more equal and political rights. Inspired by Greek tales of democracy and made determined by the increasing hardships face by the ordinary commoner the plebeians demanded more equality.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gracchi Brothers Rebellion

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the unique features of public service in the Roman Republic was the delicate balance between refining Rome and gratifying the aristocracy that overpopulated every legislative body. Those courageous enough to defy typical conventions and the hierarchy of Roman politics encountered delightfully diverse methods of death. The most notable examples of Roman politicians who died in infamy were Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, tribunes who encouraged populist land reforms and repeatedly flouted the limits of their power. While their reforms were necessary, the Gracchi brothers’ rebellion further engendered an authoritarian relationship between the controlling Senate and Consuls, thereby portraying them as selfish enemies of the state, and weakened…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The group of men in the Roman senate were responsible for war policy, controlling lands, government decisions and making laws. The Roman government having the Roman senate was good because the senate was their way of keeping the government stable. In the Roman senate there were only 300 men, which is a very small number of…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    However, Rome was had a republic government led by consuls, and also a powerful senate. He had what we call Comitia which was the name for the Assembly; and contrary to Carthage, the real power was at the hands of a great body of loyal citizens. Her government placed the army in the hands of the civil magistrates or consul (Morey, 1901). I notice that the strength and the greatness of a country, do not almost always depend on the form of government established in this country.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic was a great era in Rome’s history and it was democratic, but how democratic was the Roman Republic? The Roman Republic lasted from 50 B.C. and lasted to 27 B.C.. This helped pave the way for the Roman Empire The Roman Republic was not very democratic because its constitution had little room for the people, the Senate only let patricians in the Senate , and not many people voted, thus it paved the way for the Roman Empire.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Republic was a model for our government system (USHistory, 2017). A system of elected officials in executive, legislative, and judicial branches that were responsible to the voters that elected them. The Roman Republic was comprised of Consuls, the Senate, and the Assemblies (Osborne, 2015). There were two consuls that were voted on annually, but their power was limited since they could veto each other. The Republic, naturally, was more corrupt because the consuls in power were voted by the patricians (USHistory, 2017).…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There was not just one cause the downfall of the Roman Republic. Social and political problems, fast expansion, and corruption among the powerful had a huge effect on the fall of the roman republic. Some people say that the Roman Republic began in 509 B.C. with the end of the Roman monarchy in 27 B.C. One of the many issues that caused the falling of the republic was corruption in the government. Rome used to be democracy, Rome put power into the hands of many few (beard,2011). Only the rich could become in the senate, and the votes of rich people had more power than the votes of the normal people.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Citizenship is a status given by a government to some or all of its people. Rome gave citizenship to most of its people, whereas Athens gave citizenship very few of its people. The Roman government was more lenient to its population 45,000,000 people. The Roman government had a system set up for those who were foreigners and wanted to become citizens. The Romans may have been lenient, but they had limits for citizens too.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The senate in the Roman Republic had created a nice life for themselves with little to no opposition. The senate made their decisions based on what would make them wealthier and there for more powerful in the society of the Roman Republic. The rich got richer, the poor poorer and a few aspiring politicians saw the chance to make a name for themselves using that unfortunate fact in the Roman Republic’s history. This tactic was employed by the Gracchus brothers and that caused a tremor in the lives of the senate but it wouldn’t be enough to topple their golden thrones. It would take the combined effort of three men and the senate themselves to topple the Roman Republic.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Military Politics

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Well organized society by Politics had many impacts on a military. To illustrate, Roman divided their society into three parts which were Senate, people, and Consuls. The Senate were the once who had authority to control the economy of the state; it means that they look over the money of the state. People were workers, employs and low cast people. Finally, Consuls were the people who had the most power in the society, and they had the power to control all the state.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic was in control of many regions and not all of these inhabitants were delighted with the current circumstances, especially the citizens in Rome. During the period of the expansion of Rome, the government was becoming less democratic and started displaying signs of an oligarchy. The Senate of the Roman Republic was the prime branch of government. This was comprised of leaders from the patricians, the noble, and wealthy families of ancient Rome. Members of the senate were not elected but were chosen by the Consuls.2 The senate’s main task was to direct spending and verdicts associating with foreign powers.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Roman Republic was very democratic and in Document A it states that by telling you that Roman Republic was a democracy. In Document B Professor Fergus Millar tells more about how the Roman was a democracy as he states , “The constitution of the Roman Republic made it a variety of democracy. Every adult male citizen, unless specifically disqualified, had a vote, and there was no formal exclusion of the poor , free slaves could also vote.” Document B states more by telling the most fundamental of all the rights of the people was, however, the fact that they, and they alone could legislate. There were very practical barriers to fair and equitable voting in the popular assemblies said in Document C. “The Roman constitution has three elements ,…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throuhout his dictatorship Sulles was able to successfully restore the senate, reduced the power of the assembly, take control of the magistrates by weakening their command, reshaped the entire judicial system to provide a trial for each criminal case. However, when he died the vicious cycle started all over again; with the senate taking back the power and continuing the corruption and further erasing the republic. Many more attempts to rule Rome ensued, war broke out and power was battled between the forever famous Cato, Cicero, and Julius Caesar. (Morey, 1901). The cycle spun and following each fallout Rome remained to regroup.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays