Roles Of Judiciary In The Philippines

Improved Essays
“The Roles and Functions of the Judiciary: A Comparison between Malaysia and the Republic of Philippines”

The judiciary of Malaysia and the Republic of Philippines are similar, but owing to different historical influences, both judiciary systems have developed differently to perform the same purpose of upholding the law as enacted by the legislature alongside the executive.
The history of the Malaysian judiciary traces across three major timelines; that is, the pre-British colonial era, the British colonial period, and the post-independence of Malaysia. The pre-British colonial era saw the reign of the Malay Sultanates as its earliest record of an existence of a proper legal system for the administration of justice, where previously disputes
…show more content…
The segregation of the two court systems was also retained where civil courts now have jurisdiction to hear all cases apart from matters concerning Islamic law while applying English law in accordance to the provisions of the Civil Law Act.
While the Malaysian judiciary is largely formed from British influence, the Philippines’ judiciary is based on the American’s influence. The history of the Philippines’ judiciary spans across six major timelines; that is, the pre-Spanish Conquest, the Spanish Regime, the American Regime, the Commonwealth period, the Martial Law period, and subsequently the post-independence period in which Philippines recovered its status of a ‘republic’ country.
Before the Spanish invaded Philippines, the indigenous Filipinos had their own system of laws in administering justice derived from customs, usages, and tradition. The unit of government was the ‘barangay’, which was a settlement consisting of about thirty to hundred families. A chieftain called the ‘datu’ headed each barangay which were independent of each other, and acted as the executive, legislative, and the judiciary over his barangay. As such, disputes in the barangay are heard by the datu sitting as a judge with the help of barangay elders as the jury, and wars between barangays were averted by arbitration with datus from other barangays as

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION This essay examines the Australian court hierarchy, and the extension power the High Court attains as it has the ability too overturn decisions made by the Supreme Court. As it is the final court of appeal therefore reintegrates the point that the power of appointment is held within the body of the High Court. As the Australian Federal system consists of national court and a court system for each individual state and the two territories.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    C Parliamentary Sovereignty v Bikie Laws The doctrine of separation of powers works alongside that of parliamentary sovereignty, in that the parliament decisions reign of all others. In practice, the parliament can enforce and create laws that override court decisions, which the court has to enforce. The laws being enforced in the case of R v Brown, enacted by the Queensland Parliament include mandatory requirements for the courts, such as mandatory refusal of bail. These target those who are alleged bikie members, bikie members or members by association. This limits the unfettered independent decisions of the courts, as they now must follow the obligatory sentences set by the laws of Parliament.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A Humiliating Failure for America The decision to annex the Philippines by the US created widespread unrest on both foreign and domestic fronts. This topic was recognized highly controversial by both the American and Filipino people, as well as the rest of the world, and a foolish move on America 's part. The debates following the annexation made clear distinctions on the reasons why the Philippines was annexed in the first place versus the reasons our actions contradict our motives. The arguments made for annexation are the obvious economic and strategic reasons veiled behind religious other absurd regurgitation justifying a poorly made move toward a goal.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Legistlative branch sets federal regulations, the Exceutive branch signs the treaties and protects home, and what does the Judicial branch have the power to do? Well, while the other two branches are off doing those things the Supreme Court sits back and watch them work. The Judicial branch’s role in the seperation of powers allows them to watch the other two branches of government to make sure they are abiding by the Constitution. This process is known as judicial review. Judicial review gives the courts the power to examine the actions of the legislative, executive, and administrative arms of the government and to determine whether such actions are consistent with the constitution (Tate, 2015).…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The victory of America in the Spanish-American war during 1898 resulted in a variety of outcomes. One of the most prominent of these being that America was granted the decision of whether or not they would annex Spanish colonies, such as Cuba and the Philippines. America decided that they would not annex Cuba, however the fate of the Philippines was still at stake. After a long contemplation, the US Senate decided to ratify a treaty stating that they would indeed annex the Philippines. Although controversial, the decision to annex the Philippines was wise because the Philippines was incapable of self-government, European rivals would claim the Philippines if the US had not, and America would provide Filipinos with an education and a civilized…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dynamic Court View

    • 2579 Words
    • 11 Pages

    United States of America consists of the most diverse and complex societies in the world, with equally extensive legal system. Its legal system is ostensibly different from other countries, for its peculiarity, and in that reason, US legal system is heavily critiqued, commended, and condemned both at home and abroad. Seemingly, the Constrained Court View versus the Dynamic Court view is the most prevalent debate surrounding American judiciary system. This controversy is a deep-rooted argument tracing back to the founding fathers, who discussed whether our chosen forum for orderly dispute resolution is dynamic and flexible or constrained and limited in its ability. Some argue American legal system is undoubtedly dynamic and capable of spurring…

    • 2579 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I think the judicial branch has the most power I say this because they can overpower the president even though he appointed them. The supreme court is also the most powerful it is the highest court in the country. They can overrule the president. Last but not least they have long lasting power that they can keep for the rest of their lives as long as they use that power in the right way and they don’t take advantage, they also can not have any type of “ Bad behavior” or that power will get taken away for good.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sports law is relevant to the administration of sports and a person’s participation in sport whether they play at amateur, professional or international level. The legal issues that arise from a sporting activity can involve aspects of contract law, torts, anti-discrimination, trade practice and criminal law The most common procedure involves breaches of the rules of the game that are contrary to the principles of the game that are seen as being against the morals of sportsmanship. From this point this is able to be dealt with by the governing bodies through possibly being sent to a tribunal and then Governing bodies Most commonly it can be seen that parliament does not make law regarding sports as a result they leave the decision to…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The True Extent of the Supreme Court’s Constitutional Influence Many Americans currently lack a basic fundamental understanding of the Supreme Court’s origins and workings. The Court is a virtually unacknowledged entity. Unlike the executive or legislative branches, most Americans are only exposed to the Court during a greatly publicized issue—such as affirmative action or doctor assisted suicide. The Supreme Court is entrusted with the Constitution’s preservation through the process of judicial review. This authority means many of the Court’s decisions have a great effect on the American people.…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the creation of judicial review was a significant victory for the Supreme Court, it is also much more complicated than what meets the eye. Judicial review can also be more accurately described as “constitutional review” due to the controversial methods that judicial reviews is carried out (“Judicial Review | Law”) . Such views included what is referred to as “judicial restraint approach” and “activist approach.” In judicial restraint approach, judges are believed to be able to decide cases only on the basis of the language of the laws and the Constitution. However, when looking at the activist approach, judges are able to recognize the principles of the laws or the Constitution and use them in response to circumstances of moral or…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Professor Gerald Rosenberg, in his analysis on whether courts are powerful agents in achieving social change, highlights two main court views: The Dynamic Court view and the Constrained Court view. The Dynamic Court view holds that courts are successful agents in producing social change, while the constrained court view argues for the opposite (Rosenberg, 2). The American civil rights movement was an important demonstration in Rosenberg’s argument of the Constrained Court view (Rosenberg, 9). The Constrained court view maintains that courts cannot produce social change. In my response, I will deconstruct his court views to understand whether courts can produce significant social reform.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Vietnam Government

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Government The government of Vietnam is in a communist/socialist state, and the framework of the government is a single-party socialist republic. The call themselves the Socialist Republic of Vietnam The single-party is lead by the Communist Party of Vietnam. In a single-party government usually the government forces you to be part of this government, while all other political views or parties are outlawed or banned.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Common Law And Islamic Law

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil law systems give their legislatures the power to make laws not to judges. Judges in this system makes their decisions based on legal codes, laws, and statues. Each case that a judge hears is treated as an individual incident without precedent. In the Islamic system the Qur’an, the Sunna, judicial consensus, and analogical reasoning are the basis for judges to make decisions (Vago,…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    EXPLAIN THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND AND WALES AND THOSE OF CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES AND EXPLAIN THE MERITS AND PROBLEMS OF THESE LEGAL SYSTEMS A HISTORY OF TWO TYPES OF LAW The two main systems of law in the world today are common law and civil law. The system used in England and Wales is common law which has an evolving history dating from the Norman conquest of England in 1066 and the local customs of the Anglo-Saxons. English common law spread throughout the world during the growth of the British empire between the 16th and 18th centuries.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics